Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Hacking, Cracking, and Hactivism: Chantel Frenette, Roxanna Shinall, & Brooke Walker

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Hacking, Cracking, and

Hactivism

Chantel Frenette, Roxanna Shinall, & Brooke Walker


The Tech Model Railroad Club

Hack definition:
1) an article or project without
constructive end
2) work undertaken on bad
self-advice
3) an entropy booster
4) to produce, or attempt to
produce, a hack
The Hacker Ethic
-Steven Levy
1. Access to computers - and anything which might
teach you something about the way the world
works - should be unlimited and total. Always
yield to the Hands-On imperative!
2. All information should be free.
3. Mistrust authority - promote decentralization.
4. Hackers should be judged by their hacking, not
bogus criteria such as degrees, age, race, or
position.
5. You can create art and beauty on a computer.
6. Computers can change your life for the better.
John Draper aka Cap’n Crunch
History Highlights
• BBSs and hacking groups emerge
including Legion of Doom
• War Games
• Hacker magazines
• CFAA
• The Morris Worm
• Cyberespionage
• Hacker’s Manifesto
History Highlights
• Operation Sundevil
• Kevin Poulsen
• Def Con
• Kevin Mitnick
• AOHell
• Pentagon breakins
• Denial of Service attacks
• DNS Attacks
Kevin Mitnick
Hacking - For Good
Ethical Hacking
“The Best Defense Is A Good Offense.”
• Performed for the sake of “enhancing the performance of a
device or exposing the vulnerabilities of a security system for
the benefit of the system administrator.”

• Penetration Testing- analysis and probe of system for


purpose of targeting flaws and weaknesses that could be
hacked and exploited by a malicious hacker (Black Hat
hackers).
- Old/unpatched software. - Poor configuration of
- Disabled or faulty security Web servers.
systems.
Hacking - For Good
Who are they?
 White Hat hackers.
 Computer and network experts who “possess a variety of
knowledge and skills concerning the web, network and
operating systems, programming, and physical security.”
 Abide by ethical principles which prevent them from
abusing computer systems.
 Trusted individuals with strict confidentiality policies.
Hacking - For Good
Ethical Hackers and Certifications
Universal Certification Does Not Exist

• The EC-Council (International Council of Electronic Commerce


Consultants) has released a certification called Certified Ethical Hacker
test.
• Other certifications available:
– OSCP-Offensive Security Certified Professional
– CEPT-Certified Expert Penetration Tester
– CPTE-Certified Penetration Testing Expert
– CPTS-Certified Penetration Testing Specialist
– ECSA-EC-Council Certified Security Analyst
Hackers - For good
Who uses them?
“Increasingly, companies of all types and sizes are
hiring security experts to act like the enemy.”
 Some companies have departments dedicated to ethical
hacking:
• IBM
• Microsoft
Hacking - For Good
Where did it come from?
• Ethical hacking emerged from early open source
software on the internet.
• Such software still exists such as Mozilla Firefox,
Wikipedia, and Citizendium.

“Open source is a
development method for
software that harnesses
the power of distributed
peer review and
transparency of process.”
Hacktivism
Hacktivism:
• Fusion of hacking and activism.
• The act of hacking or breaking into a computer system,
for a politically or socially motivated purpose.
• The individual who performs an act of hacktivism is said
to be a hacktivist.
• Computer hacking always involves some degree of
infringement on the privacy of others or damage to
computer-based property such as files, web pages or
software.
• The impact of computer hacking varies from simply
being simply invasive and annoying to destructive.
What is Hacking?
• Unauthorized use of computer and network resources.
• “Hacker” originally meant a very gifted programmer.
• Hacking is a felony in the US and most other countries.
• When it is done by request and under a contract
between an ethical hacker and an organization, it is OK!
• The difference is that the ethical hacker has
authorization to probe the target.
• “The number of really gifted hackers in the world is very
small, but there are lots of wannabes…”(-Dr. Charles C.
Palmer, IBM)
Definitions
Hacker: Cracker:
A person who enjoys exploring One who breaks security on a
the details of programmable system. Coined ca. 1985 by
systems and how to stretch hackers in defense against
their capabilities, as opposed journalistic misuse of hacker.
to most users, who prefer to An earlier attempt to establish
learn only the minimum `worm' in this sense around
necessary. 1981--82 on Usenet was
One who programs largely a failure.
enthusiastically (even …though crackers often like to
obsessively) or who enjoys describe themselves as
programming rather than just hackers, most true hackers
theorizing about programming. consider them a separate and
A malicious meddler who tries to lower form of life.
discover sensitive information
by poking around. Hence
`password hacker', `network
hacker'. The correct term for
this sense is cracker.
Who hacks?
• Hackers in Eastern Europe hacked about 1
million credit card numbers from 40 financial
companies in the United States in 2003
alone.
• 64% of companies suffered losses from
hackers’ activities.
• More serious offenders, able to cause
damage to a system, are known as hackers.
Who cracks?
• There are 3 groups of crackers:
• Vandals: hack computer systems for
destruction (deleting files).
• Jokers: the most harmless; hacking systems
and carrying in different sounds, noises, and
visual effects.
• Breakers: professional criminals commit
hacking of computer systems with the purpose
of money theft, industrial or commercial
espionage, and thefts of expensive software.
Laws, Fines, and Penalties
• Hackers, virus and worm writers could get 20 years to
life in federal prison.
• Anyone who uses computers to cause death or bodily
harm, such as bringing down power grids or airport
control centers, can get the maximum sentence.
• The sentence is increased by 25% if they steal
personal information.
• The sentence is increased by 50% if they share the
stolen information.
• If posted on the Internet, sentence is doubled!
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Summary of CFAA Compromising Confidentiality Provisions

Offense -Sentence
•Obtaining National Security Information -10 (20) years
•Compromising the Confidentiality of a Computer -1 or 5
•Trespassing in a Government Computer -1 (10)
•Accessing a Computer to Defraud & Obtain Value -5 (10)
•Knowing Transmission and Intentional Damage -10 (20 or life)
•Intentional Access and Reckless Damage -5 (20)
•Intentional Access and Damage -1 (10)
•Trafficking in Passwords -1 (10)
•Extortion Involving Threats to Damage Computer -5 (10)
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Original 1986 Act:

Intentional Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = No crime


Reckless Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = No crime
Negligent Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = No crime
1994 Revision:

Intentional Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = Felony


Reckless Damage: Trespassers = Misdemeanor Authorized Users = Misdemeanor
Negligent Damage: Trespassers = No crime Authorized Users = No crime

1996 Revision:

Intentional Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = Felony


Reckless Damage: Trespassers = Felony Authorized Users = No crime
Negligent Damage: Trespassers = Misdemeanor Authorized Users = No crime
Works Cited
• Baase, Sara. A Gift of Fire. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2003.
• “A Convicted Hacker Debunks Some Myths.” CNN.com. 13 Oct 2005. CNN. 3 Nov
2007. <http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/internet/10/07/kevin.mitnick.cnna/>.
• Draper, John. “The Story so Far…” Cap’n Crunch in Cyberspace. 2005. 3 Nov 2007.
<http://www.webcrunchers.com/crunch/story.html>.
• Eltringham, Scott (ed.). “Prosecuting Computer Crimes.” Computer Crime &
Intellectual Property Section of the United States Department of Justice. Feb 2007.
United States Department of Justice. 3 Nov 2007. <http://
www.cybercrime.gov/ccmanual/index.html>.
• InfoSec Institute, "Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures." Certified Ethical Hacking.
EC-Council. 10 Nov 2007. <http://www.infosecinstitute.com/>.
• Kreider, Aaron. “Ambiguous Definitions of Hacker: Conflicting Discourses and their
Impact Upon the Possibilities of Resistance.” Campus Activism. 13 Dec 1999.
Campus Activism. 3 Nov 2007. <http://www.campusactivism.org/html-
resource/hackers/index.html>.
• Lemos, Robert. "New laws make hacking a black-and-white choice." CNET
News.com. 23 Sep 2002. CNET News. 11 Nov 2007 <http://www.news.com/
2009-1001-958129.html?tag=fd_lede>.
• McMillan, Robert. "Hackers at Microsoft?! ." Washingtonpost.com. 6 Oct 2007. PC
World. 7 Nov 2007 <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/
2007/10/06/AR2007100600065.html>.
Works Cited
• “The National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 Legislative Analysis.”
Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section of the United States
Department of Justice. 1996. United States Department of Justice. 3 Nov 2007.
<http://www.cybercrime.gov/1030analysis.html>.
• PCWorld.com staff. “Hacking’s History.” PCWorld.com. 2007. PC World Magazine. 3
Nov 2007. <http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,45764-page,1/article.html>.
• Peterson, Craig R. "The Laws, Fines and Penalties Facing Hackers." Mainstream
Security Services, LLC. 4 Nov 2007. <http://www.mainstream.net/summary/
hacker_laws_sentencing_penalties.shtml>.
• ProzacOD. “Business card for Mitnick Security Consulting, LLC.” Online Image.
Mitnick Security Consulting, LLC. 10 Nov 2007. <http://
www.kevinmitnick.com/>.
• Raymond, Eric S. “The New Hacker’s Dictionary.” Jargon File Resources. 25 July
1996. 3 Nov 2007. <http://www.ccil.org/jargon/jargon_toc.html>.
• Redfern, Chad. "What is Ethical Hacking?." PRWeb Press Release News Wire. 29
Dec 2004. PRWeb Press Release News Wire. 11 Nov 2007. <http://
www.prweb.com/releases/2004/12/prweb191822.htm>.
• Sabadash, Victor. "What is Hacking?" Computer Crime Research Center. 2 Nov
2007. <http://www.crime-research.org/news/>.
• Sabadash, Victor. "Who hacks? Who cracks?" Computer Crime Research Center. 2
Nov 2007. <http://www.crime-research.org/news/>.
Works Cited
• Samavati, Shaheen. "More companies using ethical hackers to pose as enemy in the
name of security." The Plain Dealer. 1 Oct 2007. The Plain Dealer
Newspaper. 8 Nov 2007. <http://www.cleveland.com/business/plaindealer/
index.ssf?/base/other/119122827862110.xml&>.
• Samson, Pete (derived). “Abridged Dictionary of the TMRC Language.” The Tech
Model Railroad Club of MIT. 23 Nov 2005. Tech Model Railroad Club. 3 Nov
2007. <http://tmrc.mit.edu/dictionary.html>.
• Scholes, Dan. “Kevin Mitnick: The Most Notorious Hacker.” Webster University
Worldwide. Webster University. 3 Nov 2007.<http://www.webster.edu/
philosophy/~umbaugh/courses/frosh/dairy/mitnick.htm>.
• Various. "Ethical Hacking." The Ethical Hacker Network. 2007. The Ethical Hacker
Network. 11 Nov 2007. <http://www.ethicalhacker.net/content/category/
1/31/3/>.
• “Various.” Various dates. Online images. myoldmac.net. 10 Nov 2007. <http://
myoldmac.net/FAQ/TheBlueBox-1.htm>.
• “Various.” Various dates. Online images. Amazon. 10 Nov 2007. <http://
www.amazon.com/>.
• “Various.” Various dates. Online Images. Google.com. 10 Nov 2007. <https://
www.google.com>.
• Various. "Welcome to Offensive-Security.com." Offensive-Security. Various dates.
Offensive-Security. 11 Nov 2007. <https://www.offensive-security.com/
index.php>.
• Various. “White Hat." Wikipedia. 2007. wikipedia.org. 11 Nov 2007. <http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hat>.

You might also like