David Sm14 Inppt09

Strategy
Review,
Evaluation,
and Control
Chapter Nine
Chapter Objectives
1. Describe a practical framework for evaluating

strategies.
2. Explain why strategy evaluation is complex, sensitive,
and yet essential for organizational success.
3. Discuss the importance of contingency planning in
strategy evaluation.
4. Discuss the role of auditing in strategy evaluation.
5. Discuss the Balanced Scorecard.
6. Discuss three twenty-first-century challenges in
strategic management.
9-2
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
A Comprehensive Strategic-
Management Model
9-3
The Nature of Strategy Evaluation
Strategy evaluation includes three basic

activities:
1.examining the underlying bases of a firm’s
strategy
2.comparing expected results with actual
results
3.taking corrective actions to ensure that
performance conforms to plans
9-4
The Nature of Strategy Evaluation
 Consonance and  Consistency and

advantage are feasibility are
mostly based on a largely based on
firm’s external an internal
assessment assessment
9-5
Rumelt’s Criteria for
Evaluating Strategies
9-6
Rumelt’s Criteria for
9-7
A Few Big Company Household Names
That Disappeared Over Past Years
9-8
Why Strategy Evaluation is
More Difficult Today
1. A dramatic increase in the environment’s
complexity
2. The increasing difficulty of predicting the
future with accuracy
3. The increasing number of variables
4. The rapid rate of obsolescence of even
the best plans
9-9
Why Strategy Evaluation is
More Difficult Today
5. The increase in the number of both
domestic and world events affecting
organizations
6. The decreasing time span for which
planning can be done with any degree of
certainty
9-10
The Process of Evaluating
Strategies
 Strategy evaluation should initiate
managerial questioning of expectations
and assumptions, should trigger a review
of objectives and values, and should
stimulate creativity in generating
alternatives and formulating criteria of
evaluation
9-11
The Process of Evaluating
Strategies
 Evaluating strategies on a continuous
rather than on a periodic basis allows
benchmarks of progress to be established
and more effectively monitored
 Successful strategies combine patience
with a willingness to promptly take
corrective actions when necessary
9-12
Reviewing Bases of Strategy
 How have competitors reacted to our

strategies?
 How have competitors’ strategies changed?
 Have major competitors’ strengths and
weaknesses changed?
 Why are competitors making certain
strategic changes?
9-13
Reviewing Bases of Strategy
 Why are some competitors’ strategies more

successful than others?
 How satisfied are our competitors with their
present market positions and profitability?
 How far can our major competitors be
pushed before retaliating?
 How could we more effectively cooperate
with our competitors?
9-14
Key Questions to Address in
1. Are our internal strengths still strengths?
2. Have we added other internal strengths? If
so, what are they?
3. Are our internal weaknesses still
weaknesses?
4. Do we now have other internal
weaknesses? If so, what are they?
9-15
Key Questions to Address in
5. Are our external opportunities still
opportunities?
6. Are there now other external
opportunities? If so, what are they?
7. Are our external threats still threats?
8. Are there now other external threats? If so,
what are they?
9. Are we vulnerable to a hostile takeover?
9-16
A Strategy-Evaluation Framework
9-17
Measuring Organizational
Performance
Strategists use common quantitative criteria
to make three critical comparisons:
Comparing the firm’s performance over
different time periods
Comparing the firm’s performance to
competitors’
Comparing the firm’s performance to
industry averages
9-18
Problems with Quantitative
Criteria
 Most quantitative criteria are geared to
annual objectives rather than long-term
objectives
 Different accounting methods can provide
different results on many quantitative
criteria
 Intuitive judgments are almost always
involved in deriving quantitative criteria
9-19
Additional Key Questions
 How good is the firm’s balance of

investments between high-risk and low-risk
projects?
investments between long-term and short-
term projects?
investments between slow-growing markets
and fast-growing markets?
9-20
Additional Key Questions

investments among different divisions?
 To what extent are the firm’s alternative
strategies socially responsible?
 What are the relationships among the firm’s
key internal and external strategic factors?
 How are major competitors likely to respond
to particular strategies?
9-21
Corrective Actions
9-22
The Balanced Scorecard
1. How well is the firm continually improving

and creating value along measures such
as innovation, technological leadership,
product quality, operational process
efficiencies, and so on?
9-23
2. How well is the firm sustaining and even

improving upon its core competencies
and competitive advantages?
3. How satisfied are the firm’s customers?
9-24
 The Balanced Scorecard approach to

strategy evaluation aims to balance long-
term with short-term concerns, to balance
financial with nonfinancial concerns, and
to balance internal with external
concerns.
9-25
An Example Balanced Scorecard
9-26
Characteristics of an Effective
Evaluation System
 Strategy evaluation activities must be
economical
 too much information can be just as bad as
too little information
 too many controls can do more harm than
good
 Activities should be meaningful
 should specifically relate to a firm’s objectives
9-27
Characteristics of an Effective
Evaluation System
 Activities should provide timely
information
 Activities should be designed to provide a
true picture of what is happening
 Activities should not dominate decisions
 should foster mutual understanding, trust,
and common sense
9-28
Contingency Planning
 If a major competitor withdraws from

particular markets as intelligence reports
indicate, what actions should our firm
take?
 If our sales objectives are not reached,
what actions should our firm take to avoid
profit losses?
9-29
Contingency Planning
 If demand for our new product exceeds

plans, what actions should our firm take to
meet the higher demand?
 If certain disasters occur, what actions
should our firm take?
 If a new technological advancement makes
our new product obsolete sooner than
expected, what actions should our firm take?
9-30
Effective Contingency Planning
1. Identify both beneficial and unfavorable

events that could possibly derail the
strategy or strategies.
2. Specify trigger points.
3. Assess the impact of each contingent
event.
4. Develop contingency plans.
9-31
Effective Contingency Planning
5. Assess the counter-impact of each

contingency plan.
6. Determine early warning signals for key
contingent events.
7. For contingent events with reliable early
warning signals, develop advance action
plans to take advantage of the available
lead time.
9-32
Auditing
 Auditing
 “a systematic process of objectively obtaining
and evaluating evidence regarding assertions
about economic actions and events to
ascertain the degree of correspondence
between these assertions and established
criteria, and communicating the results to
interested users”
9-33
Twenty-First-Century Challenges
in Strategic Management
 Deciding whether the process should be
more an art or a science
 Deciding whether strategies should be
visible or hidden from stakeholders
 Deciding whether the process should be
more top-down or bottom-up in their firm
9-34
9-35

David Sm14 Inppt09

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

David Sm14 Inppt09

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

David Sm14 Inppt09

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strategy

1. Describe a practical framework for evaluating

Strategy evaluation includes three basic

 Consonance and  Consistency and

 How have competitors reacted to our

 Why are some competitors’ strategies more

 How good is the firm’s balance of

 How good is the firm’s balance of

1. How well is the firm continually improving

2. How well is the firm sustaining and even

 The Balanced Scorecard approach to

 If a major competitor withdraws from

 If demand for our new product exceeds

1. Identify both beneficial and unfavorable

5. Assess the counter-impact of each

You might also like