The document discusses human resource (HR) audits. It defines an HR audit as a method to comprehensively review HR policies, procedures, documentation, and systems to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance. The scope of an HR audit includes evaluating HR practices and professionals against desired standards, organizational strategy/goals, and laws/regulations. HR audits are systematic processes to examine HR strategies, procedures, documentation, structures, systems, and practices.
The document discusses human resource (HR) audits. It defines an HR audit as a method to comprehensively review HR policies, procedures, documentation, and systems to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance. The scope of an HR audit includes evaluating HR practices and professionals against desired standards, organizational strategy/goals, and laws/regulations. HR audits are systematic processes to examine HR strategies, procedures, documentation, structures, systems, and practices.
The document discusses human resource (HR) audits. It defines an HR audit as a method to comprehensively review HR policies, procedures, documentation, and systems to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance. The scope of an HR audit includes evaluating HR practices and professionals against desired standards, organizational strategy/goals, and laws/regulations. HR audits are systematic processes to examine HR strategies, procedures, documentation, structures, systems, and practices.
The document discusses human resource (HR) audits. It defines an HR audit as a method to comprehensively review HR policies, procedures, documentation, and systems to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance. The scope of an HR audit includes evaluating HR practices and professionals against desired standards, organizational strategy/goals, and laws/regulations. HR audits are systematic processes to examine HR strategies, procedures, documentation, structures, systems, and practices.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 24
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that an HR audit is a comprehensive review of HR policies, procedures, documentation and systems to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance. It examines the HR function, policies, professionals and department.
HR audits are conducted to make the HR function more business driven, take stock and improve HR strategies, promote professionalism, identify reasons for lower productivity, enable growth and diversification, address dissatisfaction and enable a change in leadership.
An HR audit typically evaluates the organization's structure, strategies, systems, styles, skills/competencies, culture and their appropriateness in achieving short and long term goals.
Definition - A HR audit is a comprehensive method
to review current HR policies, procedures,
documentation and systems to identify needs for improvement and enhancement of the HR function as well as to assess compliances with ever changing rules and regulations. Scope – Covers HR Policies & Practices, HR Professionals and the HR Dept. ◦ The actual state ◦ The congruence between the desired state and actual state ◦ The alignment with the overall org strategy and goals ◦ The compliance with the laws and regulations The word audit is derived from the latin verb Audire, which means, to listen. Listening implies an attempt to know the state of the affairs as they exist and as they are expected to exist. Like any audit, HR audit is also a systematic formal process, which is designed to examine the strategies, procedures, documentations, structures, systems and practices with respect to the org’s HRM. To make HR function business driven To take stock of things and to improve HRD for expanding, diversifying and entering into a fast-growth phase For promoting professionalism among employees and to switch over to professional management MNC’s want to know the reasons for lower labour productivity and for improving their HRD strategies in the Indian context For growth and diversification Dissatisfaction with a particular component Change of leadership For effective talent utilization, retention and development and intellectual capital building Basic purpose of HR-Audit is to find:
Effectiveness: To review performance of Human resource Dept. and its activities
to determine effectiveness. Implementation: To locate gaps, lapses, failings in applying Polices, Procedures, Practices & HR-directives. Rectification: To take corrective steps to rectify mistakes. Evaluation: To evaluate HR Staff & employees. Modify: To review HR System and Modify to meet challenges in comparison with other organizations. Questioning: To seek answers to ‘What happened’? ‘Why did it happen’? ‘Why did it not happen’? Legal compliance Compensation/Salary Administration Employment/Recruiting Orientation Terminations Training and Development Employee Relations Files/Record Maintenance/Technology Policies and procedures (including employee handbook) Compliance-Employee compensation records, payroll files, job descriptions and work logs are helpful in an HR audit to determine alignment between nondiscriminatory employment practices and compensation policies and current laws and industry practices.
Workplace Policy Review-Annual reviews of employee handbooks,
standard operating procedures and workplace postings ensure employers’ rules are consistent with labor and employment laws.
HR Processes-Auditing human resources processes reveals whether
a company is operating in as efficient a manner as possible. Human resources staff qualifications and expertise are often part of an audit to assess the strength and capabilities of the department. Quality Management - HR audits that assess the quality of work performed by outside providers enable better decision- making related to retaining the services of that provider or creating ways to improve the quality of employee services performed in-house. Due Diligence-The purpose of an HR audit for due diligence inspection facilitates a seamless transition for employment processes during mergers and acquisitions. Records review and examination of HR files can uncover issues that must be resolved before finalizing a merger transaction. This type of audit also may highlight potential liability for previous employment actions and give acquiring companies a heads- up on future expenses for legal representation concerning past practices. The HR audit champions are members of staff expected to contribute to the process. They do not have to have management responsibilities. These champions are early adopters and advocates for the project who want the audit to succeed and believe that carrying out this process will be beneficial to the organisation. They understand the purpose and relevance of the project for them and the organisation. The project manager must be clear and manage expectations throughout. It must be clearly established at the start of the project that they can commit the time necessary to be a champion. The champions’ involvement and enthusiasm must also be recognised as appropriate. How to choose HR audit champions ◦ Should be a member of staff, volunteer or board member; ◦ Usually drawn from department(s) being audited; ◦ Can demonstrate commitment to the process (essential); ◦ Need to be given the time and recognition by management to undertake the role. Build commitment through effective communication: Develop and maintain a communication plan to ensure that expectations of the project remain in line with reality. Creating a framework of objective; strategy; by whom; by when, might be useful. Acknowledge and manage resistance. Recognise and manage any resistance to the technology and new or changed business processes associated with the project needs. Build synergy through teamwork. Synergy is developed to create an atmosphere that allows individuals from different backgrounds and with diverse skills, experience, needs and aspirations to work together. Ensure that the champions are active in any training and follow-up activities. Equip the champions. Ensure that the necessary resources and support are available throughout the whole duration of the HR audit process. Encourage ownership. Ensure that the HR audit champion accepts ultimate responsibility for its successful implementation. The following approaches are adopted for purpose of evaluation: Comparative approach Outside authority approach Statistical approach Compliance approach Management by objectives (MBO) approach In this, the auditors identify Competitor Company as the model. The results of their organization are compared with that Company/ industry. In this approach, a benchmarking strategy is used. Auditors identify a competitor organization which is used as a model in comparison. The audit reports are compared analytically to find areas to make corrections. The benchmarking process is quite tedious as it involves; Forming a team to take care of the process. Identifying the most suitable organization to partner for the benchmarking. Collection of data from both organization/companies. Proper analyzing and interpretation of the data. Creating an action plan and working on loopholes identified. Standards set by outside consultants are used by the audit team to benchmark for comparison with their own results. Data from published research finding and research films/ documentaries are also a source for benchmarking, to explore for causes of the problem. Statistical Approach is also known as a quantitative and qualitative approach. This method uses statistical tools and information recorded in the organization’s system. The recorded information may include employee turnover and absenteeism. The checking and auditing of employees involve complex mathematical formulas which form a standard on which all activities and programs are examined. With the mathematical data as a base, mistakes can be discovered and corrected from an early point. Other times statistical approach is supplemented with records from different sources such as films and surveys. It is an approach based on legal and organization’s policies. Auditors take a thorough look at past actions to examine whether the organization’s activities are in line with legal requirements together with the set standards, policies and procedures. Although many don’t view it as an efficient approach because it uses past information which may be biased due to various reasons. This is a goal and objective-based approach. Specific targets are laid down against which the organization’s performance is measured so as to arrive at a final decision. The Audit team conducts a survey of the actual performance then compares that performance with the desired objectives of the organization. It is noted that irrespective of the approach, it can be grouped as a comprehensive plan or special focused plan, with staff, time and costs as factors. In this method, the HR evaluates not only the financial performance of the organization but also takes into the consideration the key performance indicators of customer service, internal business process and learning & growth achieved by the organization. The four dimensions that make the balanced scorecard are: Financial Dimension: The management can determine the long term and short term financial performance of the organization that results from the actions undertaken by the management during the financial year. Customer Service: Through this dimension, the management tries to find out the perception of customers towards the organization and also the customer retention and satisfaction levels. Business Process: Under this, the management evaluates the efficiency of the production processes in terms of, how well the order was processed, when the delivery was made, and what was the cost incurred per order. Learning and Growth: This dimension talks about if any new technology or novice product introduced in the organization, the customer retention and the efficiency of training programs conducted for the personnel. It focuses on how well the organization’s resources were utilized; that results in the overall growth of the organization. Earlier, the evaluation tools just focused on the financial performance of the organization through its past records, but with the balanced scorecard, the organizations can keep a track of past as well as forecast the future performance of its operations. Arthur Anderson ◦ five stages---- ◦ 1. The clarification stage : firm focus on impact of mgt’s philosophy on human capital ◦ 2. The assessment stage: calculates the cost of investment on human capital ◦ 3.The design stage: creates prg that yield better returns on human capital ◦ 4. The implementation stage: proposed changes into practice ◦ 5. The monitoring stage: check new system against strategy Identification of the contributions of the HR department to the Organisation. Encourages greater responsibility and professionalism among members of the HR department. Clarifies HR department’s duties and responsibilities. Creation of increased acceptance of the necessary changes in the HR department. Activities Behaviors Risk Assessment Internal Controls Outcomes HR Audit is comprehensive evaluation of following Structure Strategies Systems Styles Skills/Competencies Culture(Shared Values) ◦ And their appropriateness in achieving short-term & long- term goals.
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central On-Premise: Explore the capabilities of Dynamics NAV 2018 and Dynamics 365 Business Central and implement them efficiently, 4th Edition