UNIT IV SAFETY, RESPONSIBILITIES AND RIGHTS

Safety and Risk – Assessment of Safety and Risk – Risk Benefit

Analysis and Reducing Risk - Respect for Authority – Collective
Bargaining – Confidentiality – Conflicts of Interest –
Occupational Crime – Professional Rights – Employee Rights –
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) – Discrimination

1 4/28/2019
 SAFETY AND RISK
 Safety was defined as the risk that is known and judged as
acceptable.
 But, risk is a potential that something unwanted and harmful may
occur.
 It is the result of an unsafe situation, sometimes unanticipated,
during its use.
 Probability of safety = 1 – Probability of risk
 Risk = Probability of occurrence × Consequence in magnitude

2 4/28/2019
 SAFETY AND RISK….
 Different methods are available to determine the risk (testing for safety)
 Testing on the functions of the safety-system components.
1) Destructive testing: In this approach, testing is done till the component
fails. It is too expensive, but very realistic and useful.
2) Prototype testing: In this approach, the testing is done on a proportional
scale model with all vital components fixed in the system. Dimensional
analysis could be used to project the results at the actual conditions.
3) Simulation testing: With the help of computer, the simulations are done.
The safe boundary may be obtained. The effects of some controlled input
variables on the outcomes can be predicted in a better way.
3 4/28/2019
 SAFETY AND RISK….
Safety must be an integral part of any engineering design.
In other words of William W.Lawrence, A thing is safe if its risks are
justified to be acceptable”.
So a design or thing is said be safe, if for the person who judges, the
perceived risk is high. In short, safety means an acceptable risk.
But, the drawbacks of definition of Lawrence are
Under estimation of risks
Over estimation of risks
No estimation of risks

4 4/28/2019
 SAFETY AND RISK….
A modified version of Lawrence definition is
“A thing is safe if, were its risks fully known, those risks would be judged acceptable in light of
settled principles. More fully, a thing is safe (to a certain degree) with respect to a given person
or group at a given time if, were they fully aware of its risks and expressing their most settled
values, they would judge those risks to be acceptable (to that certain degree)”
The difficulties in Lawrence definition are overcome by
Knowledge and Settled value principles – helps to rule out the irrelevant judgments
Safety is frequently thought in terms of degrees and comparisons.
The degree to which a person or group, judging on the basis of their settled values, would
decide that the risks of something are more or less acceptable in comparison with the risks of
some other thing.
We interpret “things” to include products as well as services, institutional processes, and disaster
protection.
5 4/28/2019
 RISK
When a thing or product is proved to be dangerous or hazardous then it is unsafe.
A risk is a potential that something unwanted and harmful may occur”. A risk the
possibility of suffering harm or loss.
Risk is defined as the probability of a specified level of hazardous consequence being
realized. Risk (R) is thus a product of probability (P) and consequence (C) which is given
by the equation R = P X C.
On the basis of technology, risk includes the dangers of bodily harms or economic laws
or environmental degradation.
Good engineering practice has always been concerned with safety. Whenever the society
is more influenced by technology there is more possibility of facing risks not only by the
users but also by the producers. It causes ecological imbalance. So safety demand will be
higher in degree
6 4/28/2019
 RISK…..
A risk may fall into one of the following categories
Low consequence, Low probability (can be ignored)
High consequence, High probability
Low consequence, High probability
High consequence, Low probability
Obviously we need to concentrate on the third and fourth categories of risk. The third
category of events, the so-called “learning incidents” is precursor to high consequence of
major events. The fourth category comes under the major hazards control and requires
special attention. The risk analysis is mandatory for this category of “major events”.
A disaster = A serious continued event; A state of unpreparedness.

7 4/28/2019
 Acceptability of risk
William D. Rowe says “A risk is acceptable when those affected are generally
no longer (or not) apprehensive about it. Doubtfulness depends mainly on
how the people take the risk or how people perceive it. This perception of risk
is mostly influenced by the following factors.
I. Voluntarism and control
Though people know that their actions are unsafe, their involvement of risk is
called voluntary risk. They take up these kinds of risky actions for thrill,
amusement and fun

8 4/28/2019
 Acceptability of risk…..
ii) Effect of information on risk assessments
The ways in which the information necessary for taking a decision has a great influence
on how risks are perceived. Many experiments have proved that the manner in which
information about a danger is presented can lead to reverse preferences about how to
deal with that danger.
iii) Job - Related risks / Job – Related Pressures
It depends upon the nature of the job. In most of the cases of employees in high risk jobs,
don’t have any options but to undertake them merely because of compulsion. They rarely
use the available safety equipments.
Ex: working in a steel plant or chemical plant.
So, while designing and equaling the work stations, the engineers must consider the
above said nonchalant attitude of the employers towards safety, particularly when their
9
pay is on a piecework basis. 4/28/2019
 Acceptability of risk…..
iv) Magnitude and proximity
Our reaction to risk may be affected by the magnification or the personal identification or
relationship of victims. Misperceptions of numbers can easily make us overlook losses that
are far greater than the numbers reveal by themselves.
Lessons for the engineers
Regarding the public conceptions for safety, engineers have to face two problems. First one
is the optimistic attitude.i.e the things or actions are familiar to them, they never hurt them,
and these actions can be controlled by them and present no real risk. Second one is
pessimistic attitude. This attitude comes when the public feel that an accident kills may
people, affects their inmates, they consider those risks as high ones.
 The risk communication and the risk management efforts must be structured as a two way
process.
Lay people ↔ Experts
10 4/28/2019
 Assessment of safety and risk
It is very difficult to attain hundred percent absolute safety. In an engineering product, if
there is any improvement in safety, it often goes with an increase in the cost of the product.
On the other side, the products which are not safe always increase the secondary costs to the
producer such as warranty expenses, loss of customer’s good will and down time in the
production process etc.
An engineer must know the safety measures before assessing a risk of any product. The
factors may be like:
Does the engineer have the right data?
Is he satisfied with the present design?
How does he test the safety of a product? And
How does he measure and weigh the risks with benefits for a product?
A stress on high safety and low risks leads to high primary costs and low secondary cost and
vice-versa.
11 4/28/2019
 Knowledge of risks

It is the data in designing a product. Though past experience and historical
data give better information about the safety of products designing, it is still
inadequate.
The reasons for the inadequacies are:
The information is not freely shared among industries and
There are also new applications of old technologies that provide available data
which are less useful.

12 4/28/2019
 Uncertainties in design
 Risk in a product arises due to so many uncertainties faced by all kinds of engineers such as the design
engineer, the manufacturing engineer and also the sales and application engineer. This is also the
knowledge required to assess the risk of a product. So, in order to minimize the risk involved in any
product an engineer has to investigate the following criteria:
 i) Purpose of designing
 The purpose of designing a product has lot of uncertainties in its design itself.
 ii) Application of the product
 Uncertainties may also be based on the type of loading on that design and the uses of that design. In
history, there is a best example to prove this. When Napoleon’s army crossed a wooden bridge by
marching in step, the bridge had collapsed. The design of that bridge could not bear that heavy load.
 iii) Materials and the skill used for producing the product
 There are also uncertainties regarding the materials and the level of skills used in designing and
producing the product. For example, changing economic conditions, types of materials and also
unfamiliar environmental conditions can affect the design of a product.
13 4/28/2019
 TESTING FOR SAFETY
Once a product is designed, both the prototypes and finished product must be thoroughly
checked and tested. This testing is to determine whether the product meets out the
specifications and also to see whether the products are safe. The importance of proper
testing can be explained by the disaster of a Russian submarine named “Kursk”. It sank in
August 2000 and everyone in the ship was killed. The sinking had been caused by an
explosion in the “torpedo room” which made a large hole in the body of the submarine.
Many of the crew members survived the initial explosion, but died because they were unable
to escape from the submarine and no efforts at the rescue by other ships were successful.
The Russian naval Engineers told the “Krusk” was equipped with a rescue capsule that was
designed to allow the crew members to float safely to the surface in an emergency. But due
to some reasons, this safety system was never tested. So, it is essential that in any
engineering design, all the safety systems should be tested properly to ensure that they work
as intended.
14 4/28/2019
 SAFETY AND RISK ANALYSIS
Recent occurrences of large scale accidents in which many lives were lost or in
which great damage was caused to the environment has lead to more attention
being paid to safety within industrial plants or installations.
 As a result of this attention, risk analysis techniques have come to play an ever-
increasing role.
 Risk reduction can take place at different levels viz by implementing the
inherent safety provisions during the designing stage, applying safety measures,
preventing or limiting damage, providing safety zones around industrial plants
and by emergency planning.
Each of these applications demands a specific approach for the risk analysis.

15 4/28/2019
 RISK ANALYSIS

Risk analysis is used for the assessment of the hazards associated with an
industrial or commercial activity and can be summarized by 3 questions given
below:
What can go wrong? – Hazard Identification
What are the effects and consequences?- consequence Analysis
How often it will happen? - Probability estimation

16 4/28/2019
 Analytical Methods

Several analytical methods are adopted in testing for safety of a

product/project.
1. Scenario Analysis :This is the most common method of analysis. Starting
from an event, different consequences are studied. This is more a qualitative
method.
2. Failure mode and effect analysis : In this method various parts and
components of the system and their modes of failure are studied.

17 4/28/2019
 SAFE EXIT
In the study of safety, the ‘safe exit’ principles are recommended. The
conditions referred to as ‘safe exit’ are:
1 The product, when it fails, should fail safely
2 The product, when it fails, can be abandoned safely (it does not harm others
by explosion or radiation)
3 The user can safely escape the product (e.g., ships need sufficient number of
life boats for all passengers and crew; multi-storied buildings need usable fire
escapes)

18 4/28/2019
 RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Risk- benefit analysis is a method that helps the engineers to analyze the risk in a project
and to determine whether a project should be implemented or not. It is very much closer
to cost-benefit analysis.
Risk – benefit analysis is being conducted for finding out answers for the following
questions:
I. Is the product worth applying the risk-benefit analysis?
II. What are the benefits?
III. Do they over weigh the risks?
The major reasons for the analysis of the risk benefit are:
1. To know risks and benefits and weigh them each
2. To decide on designs, advisability of product/project
3. To suggest and modify the design so that the risks are eliminated or reduced
19 4/28/2019
 THREE-MILE ISLAND CASE STUDY

20 4/28/2019
 CHERNOBYL CASE STUDY

21 4/28/2019
 Bhopal Gas Tragedy CASE STUDY

22 4/28/2019
 Respect for Authority
Decisions can be taken by a few people, but putting into action requires
larger participation from different groups of people, such as operation,
purchase, sales, accounts, maintenance, finance etc.
In effectively-and efficiently-transferring decisions to actions, the authority
comes into play a great role. Otherwise the individual discretions may ruin
the activities.
Further the authority fixes the personal responsibility and accountability
uniquely on each person. This is necessary to ensure progress in action.

23 4/28/2019
 Institutional Authority
It is the authority exercised within the organization. It is the right given to the
employees to exercise power, to complete the task and force them to achieve
their goals.
Duties such as resource allocation, policy dissemination, recommendation,
supervision, issue orders (empower) or directions on subordinates are vested
to institutional authority, e.g., Line Managers and Project Managers have the
institutional duty to make sure that the products/projects are completed
successfully.
The characteristics features of institutional authority are that they allocate
money and other resources and have liberty in execution.

24 4/28/2019
 Expert Authority

On the other hand, the Expert Authority is

(a) the possession of special knowledge, skills and competence to perform a job
thoroughly (expertise),
(b) the advice on jobs, and
(c) is a staff function.
It is also known as ‘authority of leadership’.
These experts direct others in effective manner, e.g., advisers, experts, and
consultants are engaged in an organization for a specific term.

25 4/28/2019
 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
It is the bargain by the trade union for improving the economic interests
of the worker members.
The process includes negotiation, threatening verbally, and declaration
of ‘strike’.
It is impossible to endorse fully the collective bargaining of unions or to
condemn.
There exist always conflicting views between the professionalism and
unionism.

26 4/28/2019
 CONFIDENTIALITY
 Confidentiality means keeping the information on the employer and clients, as secrets.
It is one of the important aspects of team work.
Justification for Confidentiality
 Confidentiality can be justified by various ethical theories. According to Rights-based
theory, rights of the stakeholders, right to the intellectual property of the company are
protected by this practice. Based on Duty theory, employees and employers have duty
to keep up mutual trust. The Utilitarian theory holds good, only when confidentiality
produce most good to most people. Act utilitarian theory focuses on each situation,
when the employer decides on some matters as confidential.
 Further, the following moral principles also justify the concept of ‘confidentiality’:

27 4/28/2019
 CONFIDENTIALITY……
1. Respect for Autonomy
 It means respecting the freedom and self-determination of individuals and
organizations to identify their legitimate control over the personal information of
themselves. In the absence of this, they cannot keep their privacy and protect their
self-interest.
2. Respect for Promises
3. Trustworthiness
4. Respect for Public welfare.
 Types of confidential information 1. Privileged information 2.Proprietary
information

28 4/28/2019
 Conflict of Interests

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or

organization is involved in multiple interests, financial or otherwise, one
of which could possibly corrupt the motivation or decision-making of
that individual or organization.

29 4/28/2019
 OCCUPATIONAL CRIME
 An occupational crime may be committed by
 (1) wrong actions of a person through one’s lawful employment or
 (2) crime by an employee to promote ones own or employer’s interest or
 (3) theft or
 (4) Pilferage of employee or
 (5) Damage to properties or an employees own organization
 Tease are also called white collared crimes
 Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series, OHAS-18001 Certification has been
adopted in many Indian Industries. As per the Annual report of RIL10, an initiative called
Project CASH, Change Agent for Safety and Health, had been formed to bring about a
positive change and continual improvement in occupational health practices at the work
place, besides attitudinal and behavior changes.
 This is claimed to have prevented work-related diseases, injuries, reduced absenteeism, and
ultimately increased the productivity level.

30 4/28/2019
 HUMAN RIGHTS
 Human rights are defined as moral entitlements that place obligations on other people
to treat one with dignity and respect.
 Organizations and engineers are to be familiar with the minimum provisions under the
human rights, so that the engineers and organizations for a firm base for understanding
and productivity. Provisions under ‘human rights’ are as follows:
1. Right to pursue legitimate personal interest
2. Right to make a living
3. Right to privacy
4. Right to property
5. Right of non-discrimination
6. No sexual harassment
31 4/28/2019
 Professional Rights
Under professional rights, the following provisions are protected:
1. Right to form and express professional judgment:
2. Right to refuse to participate in unethical activities:
3. Right to fair recognition and to receive remuneration for professional
services:
4. Right to Due Process from Employer
5. Right to Equal Opportunity—Non-discrimination
6. Right to Equal Opportunity—Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
7. Right to Equal Opportunity—Affirmative Action or Preferential
Treatment
32 4/28/2019
 Intellectual property rights (IPRs)
 Intellectual property rights (IPRs) are the protections granted to the creators of IP, and include
trademarks, copyright, patents, industrial design rights, and in some jurisdictions trade
secrets.
 IP permits people to have fully independent ownership for their innovation and creativity, like
that of own physical property.
 This encourages the IP owners towards innovation and benefit to the society. It is an asset that
can be bought or sold, licensed, and exchanged. It is intangible i.e., it cannot be identified by
specific parameters.
 The agreements with World Trade Organisation (WTO) and Trade-Related aspects of
Intellectual Property System (TRIPS) have been adopted effective from January 2005.
 The global IPR system strengthens protection, increases the incentives for innovation, and
raises returns on international technology transfer.
 However, it could raise the costs of acquiring new technology and products, shifting the global
terms of trade in favor of technology producers.
33 4/28/2019
 Need for Protection of IP
 IP plays an essential role to stabilize and develop the economy of a nation. This protection actually
stimulates creativity, research, and innovation by ensuring freedom to individuals and organizations to
benefit from their creative intellectual investments. The IP serves many purposes, namely
(a) it prevents others using it,
(b) prevent using it for financial gain,
(c) prevent plagiarism
(d) fulfill obligation to funding agency. ICICI Bank has advanced loan against IP as security to Shopper’s
Stoppe, New Delhi, and
(e) provides a strategy to generate steady income.
 Some of the challenges in the acquisition of IP are:
(a) Shortage of manpower in the industry. Educational institutions can play a vital role in providing the
same.
(b) High cost of patenting and lengthy procedure. This was being considered by the Government and a
simpler and faster procedure is expected, and
(c) Lack of strong enforcement mechanism.
34 4/28/2019
 Types and Norms

1. Patents
Patent is a contract between the individual (inventor) and the society (all
others). Patents protect legally the specific products from being
manufactured or sold by others, without permission of the patent holder.
Patent holder has the legally-protected monopoly power as one’s own
property. The validity is 20 years from the date filing the application for the
patent. It is a territorial right and needs registration. The Patent
(Amendment) Act 2002 guarantees such provisions.

35 4/28/2019
 Types and Norms…….
2. Copyright
The copyright is a specific and exclusive right, describing rights given to creators for their
literary and artistic works.
This protects literary material, aesthetic material, music, film, sound recording,
broadcasting, software, multimedia, paintings, sculptures, and drawings including maps,
diagrams, engravings or photographs.
There is no need for registration and no need to seek lawyer’s help for settlement. The life of
the copyright protection is the life of the inventor or author plus 50 years. Copyright gives
protection to particular expression and not for the idea.
 Copyright is effective in (a) preventing others from copying or reproducing or storing the
work, (b) publishing and selling the copies, (c) performing the work in public, commercially
(d) to make film (e) to make translation of the work, and (f) to make any adaptation of the
work. Copying the idea is called ‘plagiarism’ and it is dealt with separately.
36 4/28/2019
 Types and Norms…….
3. Trademark
 Trademark is a wide identity of specific good and services, permitting differences to be made
among different trades. It is a territorial right, which needs registration. Registration is valid
initially for 10 years, and renewable. The trademark or service mark may be registered in the
form of a device, a heading, a label, a ticket, a letter, a word or words, a numeral or any
combination of these, logos, designs, sounds, and symbols. Trademark should not be mistaken
for a design, e.g., the shape of a bottle in which a product is marketed, can not be registered as
a trademark. Trademarks Act 1999 made in compliance with TRIPS agreement, provides
further details. There are three functions of trademark:
1. Just as we are identified by our names, good are identified by their trademarks. For example,
the customer goes to the shop and asks for Lux soap. The word ‘Lux’ is a trade mark. In other
words it shows the origin or source of the goods.
2. The trademark carries with it an inherent indication or impression on the quality of goods,
which indirectly demonstrates that it receives the customer’s satisfaction. 3. The trademark
serves as silent sales promoter. Without a trademark, there can be no advertisement.
37 4/28/2019
 Types and Norms…….

3. Trade secret
A trade secret is a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern,
commercial method, or compilation of information not generally known or
reasonably ascertainable by others by which a business can obtain an
economic advantage over competitors or customers.

38 4/28/2019
 Discrimination

Discrimination means morally unjustified treatment of people on arbitrary

or irrelevant grounds.
Discrimination because of caste, sex, religion, creed, and language are
regressive actions.
Discrimination which means a morally unjust treatment of people in the
workplace is damaging to the human dignity.

39 4/28/2019
 References
1. https://sites.google.com/site/drtgnanasekaran/course-materials
2. Mike W. Martin and Roland Schinzinger, “Ethics in Engineering”, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 2003.
3. Govindarajan M, Natarajan S, Senthil Kumar V. S, “Engineering Ethics”, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi,
2004.
4. Charles B. Fleddermann, “Engineering Ethics”, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2004.
5. Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics – Concepts and Cases”,
Cengage Learning, 2009
6. John R Boatright, “Ethics and the Conduct of Business”, Pearson Education, New Delhi, 2003
7. 4. Edmund G Seebauer and Robert L Barry, “Fundametals of Ethics for Scientists and Engineers”,Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 2001
8. Laura P. Hartman and Joe Desjardins, “Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal Integrity and Social
Responsibility” Mc Graw Hill education, India Pvt. Ltd.,New Delhi 2013.\
9. World Community Service Centre, „ Value Education‟, Vethathiri publications, Erode, 2011

40 4/28/2019
 Other presentations
http://www.slideshare.net/drgst/presentations

41 4/28/2019
 Thank You

Questions and Comments?

42 4/28/2019