Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Multifactor Models of Risk and Return: Dr. Amir Rafique

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Multifactor Models of

Risk and Return

Dr. Amir Rafique


Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
 CAPM-The most useful model but also has
shortcomings:
 Single factor model
 Beta is not stable
 Proxy for the market portfolio as a benchmark

 APT was developed by Ross (1976)


 Alternative to CAPM
 Limited assumptions
 Multiple dimensions of risk
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
 The major challenges in implementing APT
are:
 Risk factors in the model are not defined in terms
of their quantity (how many they are?)

 Or their identity (what they are?)


APT-Assumptions
 Three major assumptions:

1. Capital markets are perfectly competitive

2. Investors always prefer more wealth to less wealth with


certainty

3. Asset returns can be expressed as a linear function of a


set of K risk factors
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)

R t  E t  b i 1 i  b i 2  i  ...  b i k  k   i
For i = 1 to N where:
Ri = actual return on asset i during a specified time period
Ei = expected return for asset i
bik = reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a
common risk factor
 k = a common factor with a zero mean that influences
the returns on all assets
i = a unique effect on asset i’s return that, by
assumption, is completely diversifiable in large
portfolios and has a mean of zero
N = number of assets
Comparing the CAPM & APT
Models
CAPM APT
Form of Equation Linear Linear
Number of Risk Factors 1 K (≥ 1)
Factor Risk Premium [E(RM) – RFR] {λj}
Factor Risk Sensitivity βi {bij}
“Zero-Beta” Return RFR λ0

Unlike CAPM that is a one-factor model, APT


is a multifactor pricing model
The difference is how systematic risk is
defined
Using the APT
 For illustration, assume that there are two
common factors

 First risk factor: Unanticipated changes in the rate of


inflation

 Second risk factor: Unexpected changes in the growth


rate of real GDP
Example of Two Stocks
and a Two-Factor Model

1 = changes in the rate of inflation. The risk premium


related to this factor is 1 percent for every 1 percent
change in the rate (   . 01)
1

2 = percent growth in real GNP. The average risk


premium related to this factor is 2 percent for every
1 percent change in the rate (   . 02 )
2

0 = the rate of return on a zero-systematic-risk asset


(zero beta) is 3 percent (   . 03 )
0
Example of Two Stocks
and a Two-Factor Model
bx1 = the response of asset X to changes in the rate of
inflation is 0.50 ( b x 1  . 50 )

by1 = the response of asset Y to changes in the rate of


inflation is 2.00 ( b y 1  2 )

bx 2 = the response of asset X to( bchanges in the growth


 1 .5 0 )
rate of real GNP is 1.50 x2

by 2 = the response of asset Y to changes in the growth


rate of real GNP is 1.75 ( b y 2  1 . 7 5 )
Example of Two Stocks
and a Two-Factor Model
E i   0   1b i1   2 b i 2
= .03 + (.01)bi1 + (.02)bi2
Ex = .03 + (.01)(0.50) + (.02)(1.50)
= .065 = 6.5%
Ey = .03 + (.01)(2.00) + (.02)(1.75)
= .085 = 8.5%
Multifactor Models and Risk
Estimation
 Two general approaches have been
employed in factors identification process:

 Macroeconomic-Based Risk Factor Models

 Microeconomic-Based Risk Factor Models/


Characteristic-Based Risk Factor Models
Fama-French Three-Factor Model
 Fama and French (1993) developed a
multifactor model (The 3Factor Model):

R- Rf  ai  bi1 ( Rmt - RFRt )  bi 2 SMBt  bi 3 HMLt  eit

 SMB (i.e. small minus big) is the return to a portfolio of small


capitalization stocks less the return to a portfolio of large
capitalization stocks
 HML (i.e. high minus low) is the return to a portfolio of stocks with
high ratios of book-to-market values less the return to a portfolio of
low book-to-market value stocks
Carhart Four Factor Model

Carhart (1997), based on the Fama-French three factor


model, developed a four-factor model by including a risk factor
that accounts for the tendency for firms with positive past
return to produce positive future return

R-it Rf ai  bi1 ( Rmt - RFR t )  bi 2 SMB t  bi 3 HML t  bi 4 MOM t  eit

where, MOMt = the momentum factor


Fama-French Five-Factor Model
 A five-factor model adds profitability (RMW) and
investment (CMA) factors to the three-factor model
of Fama and French (1993). RMW and CMA (stock
returns that behave like those of profitable firms that
invest conservatively) capture the high average returns

R- Rf = 𝑎𝑖 +𝑏𝑖(𝑅𝑀𝑡 −𝑅𝐹𝑡)+𝑠𝑖𝑆𝑀𝐵𝑡 +ℎ𝑖𝐻𝑀𝐿𝑡 +𝑟𝑖𝑅𝑀𝑊𝑡 +𝑐𝑖𝐶𝑀𝐴𝑡 +𝑒𝑖𝑡

Profitability and Investment are the added factors.


Estimating Expected Returns
for Individual Stocks
 Steps involve in multifactor models:
(1) a specific set of K common risk factors (or
their proxies) must be identified,
(2) the risk premia  k for the factors must be
estimated,
(3) the sensitivities (bik) of the ith stock to each
of those K factors must be estimated, and
(4) the expected returns can be calculated by
combining the results of the previous steps.
Issues

You might also like