SmartDepth Client
SmartDepth Client
SmartDepth Client
Graham Raeper
LWD Petrophysics Domain Champion
Schlumberger Drilling & Measurements
Uncertainty in Connectivity Estimates
Lateral Connectivity
Pressure
Depth Compartmentalization?
Depth
problem?
Depth
Vertical
Connectivity
6
7/31/2019 Pressure
Fluid Contact Movement
2/(2-1)=5
Depth
FWL
FWL = z x 5 = 50 ft !
z
10
7/31/2019
LWD Depth – Magnitude of Errors @30000ftMD
Stretch due to pipe & BHA weight + 30 ft
+ 13 ft
Thermal expansion
+43 ft
+150 ft
11
7/31/2019
Wireline Depth Measurement
Wireline depth measurement is made
under tension
No stretch correction is needed for
downlog in a near-vertical well. Uplog
is tied in to downlog
In a deviated well the tension on the
cable will decrease and cable will
shrink
Temperature will cause the cable to
shrink
As a result Wireline logs are always
deeper than LWD and more accurate
in low-deviation wells. In deviated well
WL logs are always too deep
14
Fitzgerald & Pedersen SPE 110318
7/31/2019
Summary of Depth Measurements
LWD depth is driller’s depth
Based on drillpipe tally made at surface conditions
Does not account for pipe stretch due to weight and temperature
15 A.Kostin
15
7/31/2019
7/31/2019
What is SmartDepth?
SmartDepth is a FEM code to correct LWD depth for
Drillpipe stretch due to drillstring weight
Drillpipe elongation due to temperature
Variations in WOB
Heave/Tide
SmartDepth corrects Wireline logs for
Effects of tension redistribution in the deviated hole
Temperature
SmartDepth correction can be applied to
LWD & Wireline logs
MWD Surveys
MDT/Stethoscope pressure stations
16
7/31/2019
SmartDepth Field Test
LWD
WL
uncorrected corrected
17 SPE 102175
7/31/2019
Chia et al SPE 102175
SmartDepth Field Test
uncorrected corrected
18
7/31/2019 SPE 102175
SmartDepth Field Test
uncorrected corrected
19 SPE 102175
7/31/2019
SmartDepth Field Test Results
Blue – LWD depth shift, Green – WL shift , Red – remaining depth difference
20 SPE 102175
7/31/2019
Drill-Off Correction
GVR Images
Artifact
Dip 1
17,077 Dip 1
17,101
Dip 2
Dip 2
17,078 Dip 3 17,102
Dip 3
Dip 4
17,079 17,103 Dip 4
Dip 2 Dip 2
17,102
17,078 Dip 3 Dip 3
24 SPE 109972-PA
7/31/2019
Conclusions & Recommendations
Depth errors may result in significant underestimation of reserves
26 A.Kostin
26
7/31/2019
7/31/2019
Publications overview
M. Kirkman, P. Seim “Depth measurement with Wireline and MWD logs” (presented at SPWLA
Houston Chapter, 28 April 1992)
Williamson “Accuracy prediction for directional measurement while drilling” SPE 67616 (ISCWSA
paper) - 2000
Wilson et al. “Depth Control: Reconciliation of LWD and Wireline depths, standard practice and
alternative simple but effective method” SPE 89899 - 2004
Brooks et al. “Quantification of depth accuracy” SPE 95611 - 2005
Chia et al. “A new method for improving LWD logging depth” SPE 102175 -2006
Dashevsky et al. “Dynamic depth correction to reduce depth uncertainty and improve MWD/LWD log
quality” SPE 103094 - 2006
Bordakov et al. “Improving LWD Image and Formation Evaluation by Utilizing Dynamically Corrected
Drilling-Derived LWD Depth and Continuous Inclination and Azimuth Measurements” SPE
109972 - 2007
P.Fitzgerald, Pedersen B.K. “A technique for improving the accuracy of Wireline depth
measurements” SPE 110318 – 2007
B.Pedersen, M.Constable “Operational procedures and methodology for improving LWD and
Wireline depth control, Kristin Field, Norwegian Sea” Petrophysics, vol.48, No.2
27
7/31/2019
Acknowledgements
28
7/31/2019