Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Admin. Accountability Powerpoint

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY

 Accountability is defined as the process in which public


agencies and civil servants operating inside the public
administration answer to the public, directly or through the
parliament, for public policy, financial management
and administrative discretion
 is an assurance that an individual or an organization will be
evaluated on their performance or behavior related to
something for which they are responsible. ...
Corporate accountability involves being answerable to all
an organization's stakeholders for all actions and results.
 In governance, accountability has expanded beyond the basic
definition of "being called to account for one's actions". It is
frequently described as an account-giving relationship
between individuals, e.g. "A is accountable to B when A is
obliged to inform B about A's (past or future) actions and
decisions, to justify them, and to suffer punishment in the
case of eventual misconduct".]Accountability cannot exist
without proper accounting practices; in other words, an
absence of accounting means an absence of accountability.
History and etymology

 Accountability" stems from late


Latin accomptare (to account), a prefixed form
of computare (to calculate), which in turn derived
from putare (to reckon).While the word itself
does not appear in English until its use in 13th
century Norman England,the concept of account-
giving has ancient roots in record keeping
activities related to governance and money-
lending systems that first developed in Ancient .
Types of Admin. Accountability

 Bruce Stone, O.P. Dwivedi, and Joseph G.


Jabbra list 8 types of accountability, namely:
moral, administrative, political, managerial,
market, legal/judicial, constituency
relation, and professional and Leadership
accountability.
 Political accountability is the accountability
of the government, civil
servants and politicians to the public and to
legislative bodies such as a congress or
a parliament.
Ethical
 Within an organization, the principles and
practices of ethical accountability aim to
improve both the internal standard of
individual and group conduct as well as
external factors, such as sustainable
economic and ecologic strategies.
Administrative

 Internal rules and norms as well as some


independent commission are mechanisms to hold
civil servants within the administration of
government accountable. Within department or
ministry, firstly, behavior is bound by rules and
regulations; secondly, civil servants are
subordinates in a hierarchy and accountable to
superiors.
Principles of Accountability

 A person cannot delegate greater authority,


responsibility, and accountability than they have.
 A person delegating taks is responsible for ensureing
those tasks are being performed properly. ...
 Each Administrative Official is responsible for
monitoring the effectiveness of the accountability
structure.
Administrative Accountability

 Administrative officials must develop an


appropriate structure for effectively
handling university resources. This may
involve delegating some tasks to employees
within the unit or department. This page
clarifies those areas that cannot be re-
delegated to others.
 Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, university
policies, and collective bargaining agreements, and with the terms
and conditions of gifts, contracts, and grants
 Maintenance of a sound financial condition and good business
practices for the department or business unit
 Establishment of an effective system of internal controls consistent
with the UCSD Principles of Accountability and Regulatory
Compliance
 Adherence to ethical business standards
 Administration of human resource activities in a manner that
fosters diversity in the workforce and ensures due process
 Ensuring appropriate access to, and use of, university information
and systems, including the integrity of data and transactions
entered or modified by staff in their area of responsibility
 Protecting university assets, including the proper use and
disposition of personal and sensitive information
TYPES

 Political. ...
 Ethical. ...
 Administrative. ...
 Security. ...
 Individuals within organizations. ...
 Constituency relations. ...
 Public/private overlap. ...
 Accountability in education.

You might also like