Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 114 views

    Anti Picture and Video Voyeurism

    Uploaded by

    raesha victoria yulde
    The person who took the photo argued they did not violate the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act because the woman changed clothes in a public place. However, the Act states that taking photos of someone's private areas without consent is illegal if they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy," such as believing she could change privately on the secluded beach. The Act prohibits taking such photos, sharing or selling them, even if consent was given to take the photo originally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Anti Picture and Video Voyeurism

    Uploaded by

    raesha victoria yulde
    114 views7 pages
    The person who took the photo argued they did not violate the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act because the woman changed clothes in a public place. However, the Act states that taking photos of someone's private areas without consent is illegal if they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy," such as believing she could change privately on the secluded beach. The Act prohibits taking such photos, sharing or selling them, even if consent was given to take the photo originally.

    Original Description:

    Anti picture and video voyeurism

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The person who took the photo argued they did not violate the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act because the woman changed clothes in a public place. However, the Act states that taking photos of someone's private areas without consent is illegal if they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy," such as believing she could change privately on the secluded beach. The Act prohibits taking such photos, sharing or selling them, even if consent was given to take the photo originally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    114 views7 pages

    Anti Picture and Video Voyeurism

    Uploaded by

    raesha victoria yulde
    The person who took the photo argued they did not violate the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act because the woman changed clothes in a public place. However, the Act states that taking photos of someone's private areas without consent is illegal if they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy," such as believing she could change privately on the secluded beach. The Act prohibits taking such photos, sharing or selling them, even if consent was given to take the photo originally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    Republic Act No.

    9995
    "Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009"
     What is Photo or video voyeurism?

     The act of taking photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing
    sexual act or any similar activity or of capturing an image of the private area of a
    person or persons without the latter's consent, under circumstances in which such
    person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or
     The act of selling, copying, reproducing, broadcasting, sharing, showing or exhibiting
    the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or similar activity through
    VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and similar means or device without the written
    consent of the person/s involved, notwithstanding that consent to record or take
    photo or video coverage of same was given by such person's.
    ???
    A woman, in a secluded area of the beach
    changed clothes after swimming. Without her
    knowledge, she can be seen from an angle of
    one of the cottages wherein one occupant
    took a photo of her showing her private parts.
    The person who who took the picture argued
    that RA 9995 does not apply because she
    unrobed in a public place. Is he correct?
    What does “reasonable expectation
    of privacy” mean?

     Belief that he/she could disrobe in privacy, without


    being concerned that an image or a private area of
    the person was being captured; or circumstances in
    which a reasonable person would believe that a private
    area of the person would not be visible to the public,
    regardless of whether that person is in a public or
    private place.
    Prohibited Acts…
    a) To take photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual act or any
    similar activity or to capture an image of the private area of a person/s such as the naked or
    undergarment clad genitals, public area, buttocks or female breast without the consent of the
    person/s involved and under circumstances in which the person/s has/have a reasonable
    expectation of privacy;
    b) To copy or reproduce, or to cause to be copied or reproduced, such photo or video or recording
    of sexual act or any similar activity with or without consideration;
    c) To sell or distribute, or cause to be sold or distributed, such photo or video or recording of sexual
    act, whether it be the original copy or reproduction thereof; or
    d) To publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or broadcast, whether in print or broadcast
    media, or show or exhibit the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or any
    similar activity through VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and other similar means or device.
     The prohibition under paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) shall apply notwithstanding that consent to
    record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given by such person/s. Any person
    who violates this provision shall be liable for photo or video voyeurism as defined herein.
    Exemption
     Nothing contained in this Act, however, shall render it unlawful or
    punishable for any peace officer, who is authorized by a written order of the
    court, to use the record or any copy thereof as evidence in any civil,
    criminal investigation or trial of the crime of photo or video voyeurism:
    Provided,
     That such written order shall only be issued or granted upon written
    application and the examination under oath or affirmation of the applicant
    and the witnesses he/she may produce, and upon showing that there are
    reasonable grounds to believe that photo or video voyeurism has been
    committed or is about to be committed, and that the evidence to be
    obtained is essential to the conviction of any person for, or to the solution or
    prevention of such, crime.
    Inadmissibility of Evidence

     Any record, photo or video, or copy thereof,


    obtained or secured by any person in violation
    of the preceding sections shall not be
    admissible in evidence in any judicial, quasi-
    judicial, legislative or administrative hearing or
    investigation.

    You might also like