Analysis of Data and Interpretetion of The Results of Statistical Computations
Analysis of Data and Interpretetion of The Results of Statistical Computations
Analysis of Data and Interpretetion of The Results of Statistical Computations
1. Descriptive Statistics
• Gives numerical and graphic procedures to
summarize a collection of data in a clear
and understandable way.
2. Inferential Statistics
• Provides procedures to draw inferences
about a population from a sample
Arrangement of the statement of the
problem is based from the major areas of
statistics to be used.
CV = (SD/mean)(100%)
Reliability
The concept of consistency and accuracy form
the reliability of a test. Consistency means
that the instrument yields similar results in
two or more testing occasions under identical
circumstances.
• Ways to reinforce validity of an instrument
1. Item inspection
Have the initial draft of the instrument
inspected by a group of evaluators such as
thesis advisers, test construction experts, and
teachers or professionals whose
specializations are related to the subject
matter.
Ways to reinforce validity of an instrument
2. Inter-Judge Consistency
You may collate the data gathered from the
evaluators for analysis. If you have requested
three persons to inspect your first draft, you
will have to look for the agreement or
consistency of their judgment.
3. First trial run
4. Item analysis
Two Basic Types of Inferential Statistics
Parametric statistics– techniques which make the
assumption that you are working with a normal
distributions and that the sample is random
Ordinal level
-number is used to express rank
Ex. Rank in military, results of contests, students’
year level
Interval level
Example:
Workers are randomly assigned to three
machines on an assembly line. The number of
defective parts produced by each worker for
one day is recorded. The data are shown below.
At .05 level of significance can one conclude
that the mean number of defective parts
produced by the workers is the same?
Machine A : 3 2 0 6 4 3 5
Machine B: 8 6 2 0 1 9 7
Machine C: 10 8 9 12 11 15 17
• Results of the analysis on the comparison of
mean number of defective parts produced by
the workers.
Source sum of df mean F Prob.
Of Var. Squares squares
between 284.86 2 142.43 15.42 0.0001
within 166.29 18 9.238
Total 451.14 20
= .05 level of significance
• The analysis on the comparison of the defective
parts produced by the workers resulted to
F = 18.42
with a probability of 0.0001.
There is enough evidence to claim that the variation
of the mean defective parts is attributed to the
workers.
The results imply that there is a worker who
produced greater number of defective parts
compared to others.
The machine and skills of the workers significantly
differ in the production of defective parts.
Results of Tukey-Cramer Comparison test
• A and B comparable
• A and C significant
• B and C significant, worker assigned to machine
C produced largest number of defectives than the
workers assigned to B and A.
Machine Mean
A 3.29a
B 4.71a
C 11.71b
Correlation analysis
• Correlation analysis is statistical technique use to
determine the strength or degree of linear
relationship between two variables. A measure of
the degree of linear relationship is called the
correlation coefficient (r).
• r= + , positive correlation, when both variable
increase or decrease at the same time.
• r= -., Negative correlation, as one variable
increase , the other variable decreases, and vice
versa. ( ex. Vol. of production and Price)
r= 0 , it means that two variable vary separately
Example of correlation
• Problem
The following data show the scores (Y) which
student s got in examination and the number of
hours (x) they studied for the examination
X: 9, 3, 10, 12, 11, 10, 6, 8, 7
Y; 85, 78 90 92, 87, 89, 80, 82, 81
Find the value of r. Discuss the result of the
computation.
Result of the correlation Analysis
Pair of r tcomp ttab
variables
when r = 0.69
R2 = (0.69)2
R2 = 0.4761
• A coefficient of determination equal to 0.4761
indicates that about 47.61% of the variation in
statistics grades (the dependent variable) can
be explained by the relationship to math
aptitude scores (the independent variable).
This would be considered a good fit to the
data, in the sense that it would substantially
improve an educator's ability to predict
student performance in statistics class.
THANK YOU AND GOOD DAY!