Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Election Analysis

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

FY- A

Aishwarya Athiban
Aparna Menon
Diteshri Guha
Gaddamanugu Venkata Anvitha
Girish Sharma
Harasees Kaur
 The term Psephology has Greek origins and is made from
the combination of two words, psephos meaning pebble
and logy denoting a field of study. Since psephos were used by
the Greeks as ballots, psephology thus becomes the scientific
study of elections and voting behaviour.
 Psephology is the study of elections, voting patterns, and
electoral behaviour, and the forecasting of election results.
This became a specialist field of political sociology with the
spread of regular opinion polls on voting intentions, major
post-election interview surveys, access to population census
statistics for small areas, and sophisticated data analysis and
modelling packages
1. Nomination of filling of affidavits
2. Model code of conduct
3. Appointing observers and micro observers
by ECI
4. Expenditure monitoring
5. Polling
6. Counting
7. Declaration of results
Accounting
teams
Media
certification
Video
and
surveillance
monitoring
committee

Flying
Video
squad viewing
teams The
teams

Call centre
and Assistant
complaint expenditure
monitoring observers
teams

Static Expenditure
surveillance monitoring
team cell
The polls are conducted after a voter has cast his or her vote at the
polling station.
The polls predict the final result on the basis of the information collected
from various voters.

Opinion polls and Exit polls


Opinion Polls Exit Polls

They are conducted before the They are conducted after the
elections. elections.
They forecast the result of They predict the final result
voting based on an assesment based on the votes already
of public opinion. cast.
They are less accurate. They are more accurate.
How accurate are exit polls?
In India, exit polls often have turned out to be unreliable. In previous
instances, the exit polls have made incorrect predictions, especially in
2004, when they predicted NDA victory and in 2009, when they
wrongly judged UPA's seat share. The 2014 exit polls, however,
rightly predicted a BJP win.
How are the exit polls calculated?
The firms conducting the exit polls usually ask voters who they voted
for and on the basis of that they make their final result prediction.
The prediction is solely based on the fact that the voters have given
correct answers.
Some of the key pillars of a sound exit poll are:
 Large sample size
 Diversity in subjects
 Usage of technology to gather data
 Accurate prediction of seats each party will win

What Is The Swing Model?


The prediction of seats that each party may win in the
election is based on a swing model. The current poll makes
an estimate of vote shares for political parties and alliances
by interviewing selected respondents, and the seat forecast is
made based on the result of the previous election.
Performance Of Political Parties
600
500 481 485 462 471 478
451
400 418 421 440 440 403 387
369 364 376
342
300
200
158 159 146 182
100 129
101
42 43 40 49 66 51 49
37
34 31 28
20 35 14
13 93 34 13 27
19
12 15 12 16
0 0 6 2 91 0 41 9
2 6 10
6 5 9 3

Recognised National Parties Recognised State Parties


Registered Unrecognised Parties Independent Parties
2009 2014 2019
15th Lok Sabha 16th Lok Sabha 17th Lok Sabha
elections elections elections

Voter turnout - Voter turnout - Voter turnout-


56.97% 66.44% 67.11%

UPA won NDA won NDA won


Total voters
Those who did not vote

34%
42% 58%
66%

Voter turnout in 2014 elections Voter turnout in 2009 elections


Voter Turnout
100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Voter Turnout LS 2014 Voter Turnout LS 2009


S.No State Percentage Percentage DX=X-A DX^2 DY=Y-A DY^2
of voters of voters Where Where
from each from each A=7.9 A=14.25
state(2009) X state(2014) Y

1. Delhi 4 3.9 -3.9 15.21 -10.35 107.12


2. Tamil Nadu 15 16.9 7.1 50.41 2.65 7.02
3. Andhra 21 20.02 13.1 171.61 5.77 33.29
Pradesh
4. Chandigarh 0.1 0.1 -7.8 60.84 -14.15 200.29
5. Karnataka 15.28 14.25 7.3 53.29 0 0
6. Kerala 7.9 7.5 0 0 -6.75 45.56
7. Gujarat 13.3 12.52 5.4 29.16 -1.73 2.99
8. Assam 6.3 5.8 -1.6 2.56 -8.45 71.4
9. J&K 13.4 2.2 -5.5 30.25 -12.05 145.2
10. MP 2.9 14.8 6 36 0.55 0.3
Total ∑DX ∑DX^2 ∑DY ∑DY^2

20.1 449.33 -44.51 613.08

Mean = ∑X/n Mean = Σ Y/ n


=99.1/10 = 97.99/10
=9.91 = 9.79
Standard Deviation = √ Σ DX^2 /n - ( ΣDX/n)^2
Standard deviation = √ Σ DY^2/n - ( ΣDY/n)^2
=√449.33/10 - ( 20.1/10)^2 = √ 613.08/10 - ( -
44.51/10)^2
=√ 40.86
= 6.3 = √ 41.49
= 6.44
Coefficient of variance = SD/ Mean ×100
CV = 6.3/9.91×100 Coefficient of variance = SD /Mean ×100
= 63.5%
CV. = 6.44/9.79×100
= 65.78%
1. Electoral roll in 2009 was better than 2014 as
per the data taken on the basis of Mean .
2. Standard deviation of percentage of voters
from each state in 2009 is 6.3 whereas it is 6.44
in 2014
3. Coefficient of variance in 2009 is 63.5% and
that of 2014 is 65.78%
1. The coefficient of variation shows the
extent of variability of data in sample in
relation to the mean of the population.
2. The coefficient of variance of both the years
is very high indicating high amount of
deviation among the states in terms of
number of voters. As per the data taken for
2009 percentage of voters in Chandigarh
were 0.1% whereas that of Andhra Pradesh
is 21% which is a huge difference therefore
there is a huge percentage of deviation.
Weaknesses Remedies
Absence of consideration of public Right to recall-right to the citizens to
opinion reject all candidates, if they wish to do so.

Regular cases of corruption and both Enhancement in the powers of election


capturing commission

Abusive use of political power by Steps to minimise instances of corruption


politicians and booth capturing

Poor management of democratic Reduction in the number of political


institutions parties

Division of society to attain political gains Avoiding dynastic succession within


political parties
 The purpose of this comprehensive project is to get an idea
how statisticians do the analysis of elections and develop a
grater understanding.
 We have used both theory and practical to do the analysis
and statistical tools like arithmetic mean, standard deviation
and coefficient of variation are used.
 The greater deviation in the electoral roll is due to variations
in the number of voters from different state ; obviously
Chandigarh and UO cannot have same number of voters.
 The use of graphs give better idea of the situation so pie
charts and different curves are used for the purpose.
 eci.gov.in
 Economic Times
 India Today
 Encyclopedia.com
 Analyticsindiamag.com
 Indianexpress.com
 Theprint.com

You might also like