Delamere Vineyard - Group06
Delamere Vineyard - Group06
Delamere Vineyard - Group06
OPERATIONS STRATEGY
Case : Delamere Vineyard
Section A: Group 6
Richardson is the greatest strength with his focus on quality and his personal
attention.
Richardson has immense knowledge and experience relevant to wine making. (Ph.D
and work experience).
Location with suitable climate and grape varieties (pinot noir and chardonnay)
preference based on research and inspiration from predecessor
Denser plantation resulting in strong taste of the produced wine
High quality wine marked by presence of more complex chemical compounds
Ultra-premium segment of target customers.
Cellar door channel to interact with and get feedback from customers directly
Experience in the field of winemaking, possible variations and their effect on output
Weather dependency (quite uncertain) of the crop and threat from pests while crops are
grown.
Increasing average quality demand and high competition in the target segment exacerbated
by boutique wineries who enjoyed wine making and could sustain losses for a long term.
Capital intensive industry where production lead time is high and returns are low.
High sensitivity of pinot noir (Prone to oxidation and loss of chemicals agents)
Manual operations and use of open fermenters (prone to oxidation)
Low consistency due to high possibility of variations in the interaction and development of
around 500 compounds
Difficult to find the root cause of a quality of the end product with too many compounds
Customers can visit the winery talk to winemakers and buy directly from source.
Knowledgeable connoisseurs who prefer more complex and unusual character can get to
discuss about the wine and its production.
Considered the feedback from the customer through cellar door sales
The grape productivity is dependent on climate and the process used by Richardson
is quite vulnerable
The wine made by him is also inconsistent in taste and other aesthetics. Moreover,
there is a gap between demand and supply for the whole industry
The wholesalers want a more consistent product both in terms of taste and other
aesthetics
In such a situation, he is not sure of what to choose between
a. Prevention of oxidation to bring consistency in taste
b. Deepen the color of wine to increase the likability
c. Determine the best mix in the crush to improve the aesthetics. He is not
confident to dedicate resources to more than one project and is in a dilemma
of what to do?
GROUP 6 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RAIPUR
9
OS
• Continual process of experimenting with various options at each phase and eliminating the
options with undesired output
• Improving the customer experience by receiving continuous feedback from customers and
comments from connoisseurs
• The employees are well trained in the processes and accountable for the overall quality
• Monitoring and ensuring quality at each stage starting from the quality of grapes, the
process of wine making to bottling and marketing of the final product
• The production of each bottle can be tracked through inventory management system
• The selling of wines through all the 3 channels must be tracked
• Vineyard production should be integrated with the inventory management system
5S
Based on quality parameters in Exhibit-2 and calculations in exhibit-1 it clear that option2 is the best choice
It has least effective expense and the cost of the expense could be recovered in three years due to the price
increase
Also cellar door customers would pay a high price for the perceived quality
The next option would be option 1 due to lower effective expense and improved consistency which is liked
by wholesalers
The last option 3 incurs highest effective expenditure
Also Like option 2 it can’t recover the cost
Though there is a probability of increased aesthetics reliability of output wine reduces due to uncertainty in
output
THANK
YOU