Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 307 views

    AP Project

    Uploaded by

    Mark Clement Aposaga
    The document asks whether livelihood activities should continue despite forest destruction. It argues they should not, as the Philippines has already lost 37% of its forests as of 2000, and destruction continues to increase. Continuing these activities will only further damage the country's dwindling natural resources and forests.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    AP Project

    Uploaded by

    Mark Clement Aposaga
    307 views5 pages
    The document asks whether livelihood activities should continue despite forest destruction. It argues they should not, as the Philippines has already lost 37% of its forests as of 2000, and destruction continues to increase. Continuing these activities will only further damage the country's dwindling natural resources and forests.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document asks whether livelihood activities should continue despite forest destruction. It argues they should not, as the Philippines has already lost 37% of its forests as of 2000, and destruction continues to increase. Continuing these activities will only further damage the country's dwindling natural resources and forests.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    307 views5 pages

    AP Project

    Uploaded by

    Mark Clement Aposaga
    The document asks whether livelihood activities should continue despite forest destruction. It argues they should not, as the Philippines has already lost 37% of its forests as of 2000, and destruction continues to increase. Continuing these activities will only further damage the country's dwindling natural resources and forests.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Question: Dapat bang ipagpatuloy ang mga

    gawaing pangkabuhayan sa kabila ng pagkasira


    ng kagubatan?

    • Dapat • Hindi Dapat


    Hindi dapat, dahil sumubra na ang nasirang likas na
    yaman at kagubatan. Sa taong 2000, 37 porsiyento
    ng nasirang kagubatan ng Pilipinas at patuloy ito sa
    pagtaas
    https://wol.jw.org/tl/wol/d/r27/lp-tg/102005002
    •
    RA 8485 –
    The Animal Welfare Act of the
    Philippines
    Proof: On February 11, 1998,
    the Animal Welfare Act of 1998
    https://paws.org.ph/the-amended-
    animal-welfare-act-ra-8485ra- (also known as Republic Act8485)
    10631.html
    was signed into law by then

    Philippine President Fidel V.


    Ramos.
    The Act provides for the conservation,
    Wildlife Resources preservation and protection of wildlife
    Conservation and species and their habitats, in order to
    Protection Act. (Republic preserve and encourage ecological
    Act No. 9147).
    balance and biological diversity; it
    provides, furthermore, for the control
    https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislati and supervision of wildlife capture,
    on/wildlife-resources-conservation-and-
    protection-act-republic-act-no-9147-
    hunting and trade; finally it pprovides for
    lex-faoc041009/ supporting and promote scientific
    research on the protection of
    biodiversity.
    Konklusyon:

    Sapat na ang nasirang parte ng kalikasan ng Pilipinas para mamulat sa


    katotohanan na unting-unti namamatay ang ating inang kalikasan.
    -Jared the gwapo 

    You might also like