Linear programming involves using linear relationships between variables to plan activities. The objective is to maximize or minimize something subject to constraints on the variables. Graphs can be used to find the optimal solution. Two examples are given: one involving maximizing profit from furniture production given constraints on assembly and finishing department hours, and another minimizing fuel costs given constraints on sulfur dioxide emissions and electricity generation.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views
Graphical Method Linear Programming
Linear programming involves using linear relationships between variables to plan activities. The objective is to maximize or minimize something subject to constraints on the variables. Graphs can be used to find the optimal solution. Two examples are given: one involving maximizing profit from furniture production given constraints on assembly and finishing department hours, and another minimizing fuel costs given constraints on sulfur dioxide emissions and electricity generation.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 51
Linear programming is planning by the use of linear
relationship of variables involved
linear- direct proportionality of relationship of variables
programming- making plans of activities 1. 1.The objective must be either to maximize or minimize 2. 2. All variables have a value greater than or equal to 1. 3. 3. the relationship of variables could be expressd in terms of equations or inequalities. 4. 4. The action of the decision-maker must be the constrained and the decision variables must not violate the limitations or constraints. Make use of graph to arrive optimum solution
Optimum solution- is a solution that makes the objective
function as large as possible (maximization) or as small as possible (minimization). 1. Objective function- introduced by the word “maximize or minimize”.
2. 2. Constraints or limitations- introduced by the word
“subject to”. 1. a. Explicit- can be expressed in mathematical sentences. 2. b. Implicit- Those that are implied (time, distance and raw materials). Needless to say that quantity is positive. 1. 1. Represents the unknown in the problem 2. 2. Tabulate the data if necessary 3. 3. Formulate the objective function and constraints 4. 4. Graph the constraints and determine the coordinates at the point of intersection and vertices. 5. 5. Substitute the coordinates at the vertices of feasible region in the objective function. 6. 6. Formulate your decision by selecting the highest value (maximization) or lowest value (minimization) 1. The Cruz furniture makes two products: tables and chairs, which must be processed through assembly and finishing departments. Assembly department is available for 60 hours in every production period, while the finishing department is available for 48 hours of work. Manufacturing one table requires 4 hours in the assembly and 2 hours in the finishing. Each chair requires 2 hours in the assembly and 4 hours in the finishing. One table contributes Php 180 to profit, while a chair contributes Php 100. the problem is to determine the number of tables and chairs to make per production period in order to maximize the profit. A small generator burns two types of fuel: low sulfur and high sulfur to produce electricity. For one hour each, gallon of low sulfur emits 3 units of sulfur dioxide, generates 4 kilowatts electricity and costs Php 160. Each gallon of high sulfur emits 5 units of sulfur dioxide, generates 4 kilowatts and costs Php 150. The environmental protection agency insists that the maximum amount of sulfur dioxide that can be emitted per hour is 15 units. Suppose that at least 16 kilowatts must be generated per hour, how many gallons of high sulfur and low sulfur must be utilized per hour in order to minimize the cost of fuel? TULDOK Ang tuldok ay may salaysay at may kahulugan Na dapat mapansin at maintindihan Kahit sino ka man ay dapat malaman Na dito sa mundo ikaw ay tuldok lang Kahit na ang araw sa kalangitan Siya ay tuldok lamang sa kalawakan Lahat ng bagay ay tuldok ang pinanggalingan At kung masdang mabuti, tuldok ang uuwian Tingnan mong mabuti ang sangkatauhan Maraming nag-aaway, tuldok lang ang dahilan Sa aking nakita, ako'y natawa lang 'Pagkat ang nangyayari'y malaking kahibangan Kaya wala kang dapat na ipagmayabang Na ikaw ay mautak at maraming alam Dahil kung susuriin at ating iisipin Katulad ng lahat, ikaw ay tuldok rin Q. Do inanimate beings like stones, woods; plants, and animals have selves? Self could either be: - non-living being (inanimate beings like stones, woods, etc.) - non-conscious living irrational beings (like plants) - conscious living irrational being (brutes/lower animals) - conscious living rational being (human) Who or What Are We? To aid in our inquiry, we can use the structures of the Avocado and the Artichoke as metaphors for human nature. A pear-shaped tropical fruit with yellowish flesh and a single seed at the center. If the avocado seed is planted, an entire new avocado plant may grow, when, if it reaches full maturity, is capable of producing another generation of avocado fruit. The seed at the center contains all the essential information about what makes an avocado an avocado. Sometimes cooked as a vegetable. The flower head of a thistle plant. It consists of spiny layers that can be peeled off one after the other. When the last layer has been removed, there is nothing left. The “heart” of the artichoke is actually the base of the flower. Although it is tasty to eat, the heart does not contain the essence of the artichoke. The artichoke is nothing but its layers. Because it is a flower, no part of the artichoke – not even the heart- can be induced to produce another generation. So, we might want to ask, Are we more like avocados or like artichokes? If we could peel away our layers, would we find a central core or merely emptiness as the last layer is removed? Do we consist entirely of our layers – genetic instructions and environmental effects – or is there something central that contains and represents the essence of who and what we are. 1. The Judaic and Christian Traditions ◦ Humans are made in the image and likeness of God ◦ Animals may have instincts and intelligence but they are not made in God’s likeness ◦ We are self-conscious ◦ We have the capacity to love ◦ We have fleshy outward appearance but inside we share the divine nature ◦ The essence of the avocado is not in the flesh but in its seed. The proof of this can be found by planting the seed, which so contains the essence of “avocadoness” that it can produce another whole avocado plant. Whatever it is that makes an avocado an avocado, is condensed into that seed. In a similar way, the Judaic and Christian traditions affirm that what makes you a person, rather than a chimp or a computer, is your special creation in the image of God. 2. The Greek Rationalist Tradition ◦ Reason is at the core of our being ◦ Our reasoning ability sets us apart from other terrestrial beings ◦ Reason controls emotions & appetites ◦ We may act like animals at times, but only because we are not using reason to control the other parts of our being ◦ Humans alone are capable of living according to reason The history of philosophy is replete with men and women who inquired into fundamental nature of the self. Along with the question of the primary substratum that defines the multiplicity of things in the world, the inquiry on the self has preoccupied the earliest thinkers in the history of philosophy: the Greeks. The Greeks were the ones who seriously questioned myths and moved away from them in attempting to understand reality and respond to perennial questions of curiosity, including the question of the self. The different perspectives and views on the self can be best seen and understood by revisiting its prime movers and identify the most important conjectures made by philosophers from the ancient times to the contemporary period. He was more concerned with another subject, the problem of the self. He was the first philosopher who engaged in systematic questioning about the self. For him, the true task of the philosopher is to know oneself. For him, every man is composed of body and soul. During his trial for allegedly corrupting the minds of the young and impiety, Socrates declared without regret that his being indicted was brought about by his going around Athens engaging men, young and old, to question their presuppositions about themselves and about the world, particularly about who they are (Plato). Socrates took it upon himself to serve as a “gadfly” that disturbed men from their slumber and shook them off in order to reach the truth and wisdom. Most men, in his reckoning, were really not fully aware of who they were and the virtues that they were supposed to attain in order to preserve their souls for the afterlife. Socrates thought that this is the worst that can happen to anyone: to live but die inside. For Socrates, every man is composed of body and soul. This means that every human person is dualistic, that is, he is composed of two important aspects of his personhood. For Socrates, this means all individuals have an imperfect, impermanent aspect to him, and the body, while maintaining that there is also a soul that is perfect and permanent. Plato claimed in his dialogue that Socrates affirmed that the unexamined life is not worth living. Plato, Socrates’s student, basically took off from his master and supported the idea that man is a dual nature of body and soul. In addition to what Socrates earlier espoused, Plato added that the three parts of the soul are working harmoniously with one another. The rational soul forged by reason and intellect has to govern the affairs of the human person, the spirited part which is in charge of emotions should be kept at bay, and the appetitive soul in charge of base desires like eating, drinking, sleeping, and having sex are controlled as well. When this ideal state is attained, then the human person’s soul becomes just and virtuous. The soul is drawn to the good, the ideal, and so is drawn to God. We gradually move closer and closer to God through reincarnation as well as in our individual lives. Our ethical goal in life is resemblance to God, to come closer to the pure world of ideas and ideal, to liberate ourselves from matter, time, and space, and to become more real in this deeper sense. Our goal is, in other words, self-realization. 1. Rational – forged by reason and intellect, govern the affairs of the human person. 2. Spirited – in charge of emotions, should be kept at bay 3. Appetitive soul – in-charge of base desires, like eating, drinking, sleeping, and having sexual intercourse (is controlled as well)
When this ideal state is attained, the human
person’s soul becomes just and virtuous. The measure of a man is what he does with power. Plato includes women as men’s equals in this system. ◦ "Wonder is the feeling of a philosopher, and philosophy begins in wonder." "...(I)f you ask what is the good of education in general, the answer is easy; that education makes good men, and that good men act nobly.“
"Our object in the construction of the State is the greatest
happiness of the whole, and not that of any one class." Denied the world of Forms Said the form exists within the object The soul exists only in the body When the body dies, the soul dies with it A life dominated by reason is the ideal Reason is like a charioteer (Plato) It’s been this way since Plato in the Western world It may seem like a good idea, but when culture identifies rationality with men and emotionality with women problems arise Augustine’s view of human person reflects the entire spirit of the medieval world when it comes to man. Following the ancient view of Plato and infusing it with the newfound doctrine of Christianity, Augustine agreed to be bifurcated nature. An aspect of man dwells in the world and is imperfect and continuously yearns to be with the Divine and the other is capable of reaching immortality. There is an aspect of man, which dwells in the world, that is imperfect and continuously yearns to be with the divine while the other is capable of reaching immortality. The body is bound to die on earth and the soul is to anticipate living eternally in a realm of spiritual bliss in communion with God. This is the physical reality that is the world, whereas the soul can also stay after death in an eternal realm with the all transcendent God. The goal of every human person is to attain this The most eminent thirteenth century scholar and stalwart of the medieval philosophy, appended something to this Christian view. Adapting some ideas from Aristotle, Aquinas said that indeed, man is composed of two parts: matter and form. Our culture is still basically a male dominated society. Mitchell indicated that in the 70’s women tried to be more manlike in business – didn’t work too well (some still try – because of expectations, . . .) Women (or anyone) who accept the value of emotions run the risk of being viewed as second class citizens We are learning, however, that suppressing emotions can be unhealthy Rationalism may be important, but emotions are an important aspect of life as well The father of modern philosophy. He conceived that the human person as having a body and a mind. In his famous treatise, The Meditations of First Philosophy, he claims that there is so much that we should doubt. That much of what we think and behave, because they are not infallible, may turn out to be false. One should only believe that which can pass the test of doubt. If something is so clear and lucid as not to be even doubted, that that is the only time when one should actually buy a proposition. The only thing that one cannot doubt is the existence of the self. For even if one doubts oneself, that only proves that there is a doubting self, a thing that thinks and therefore, that cannot be doubted. Thus, his famous cogito ergo sum or I think therefore, I am. The fact that one thinks should lead one to conclude without a trace of doubt that the cogito or the thing that thinks, which is the mind and the extenza or extension of the mind, which is the body. The body is nothing else but a machine that is attached to the mind. If at all, that is the mind.
“But what then, am I? A thinking thing.
But what is a thinking thing? It is a thing that doubts,
understands (conceives), affirms, denies, wills, refuses; that imagines also, and perceives. The radical separation of mind and body--and of the mental and the physical in general--is known as "Cartesian Dualism." And by attributing to the mind something like sovereignty over the external physical world, it has prepared the way for a distinctly modern conception and experience of reality, a conception which replaced older ways of seeing the world in drastic ways. “La Tabularasa” Thinking Matter, Immateriality of the Soul and Immortality Locke chooses the word "man" to refer to that aspect of the human being that denotes him as a type of animal. With this definition of man, Locke is able to claim that the identity of man, because it is just a particular instance of animal, is tied to body and shape. That other aspect of the human being, the human as a thinking, rational thing, Locke calls "person." The identity of person rests entirely in consciousness. A person is defined as a thinking thing, and thought, as we have seen, is inseparable from consciousness Theory of alienation describes the estrangement (Ger. Entfre mdung) of people from aspects of their Gattungswesen ("species-essence") as a consequence of living in a society of stratified social classes. The alienation from the self is a consequence of being a mechanistic part of a social class, the condition of which estranges a person from their humanity. As an empiricist who believes that one can know only what comes from the senses and experiences, Hume argues that the self is nothing like what his predecessors though of it. The self is not an entity over and beyond the physical body. Empiricism is the school of thought that knowledge can only be possible if it is sensed and experienced. The philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724– 1804) can be divided into two major branches. His theoretical philosophy, which includes metaphysics, is based on the rational understanding of the concept of nature. The second, his practical philosophy, comprising ethics and political philosophy, is based on the concept of freedom. Both of these branches have been enormously influential in the subsequent history of philosophy. Kant’s moral philosophy is also based on the idea of autonomy. He holds that there is a single fundamental principle of morality, on which all specific moral duties are based. He calls this moral law (as it is manifested to us) the categorical imperative (see 5.4). The moral law is a product of reason, for Kant, while the basic laws of nature are products of our understanding. The fundamental idea of Kant’s philosophy is human autonomy. In Kant’s constructivist view of experience, according to which our understanding is the source of the general laws of nature. Kant’s moral philosophy is also based on the idea of autonomy. He holds that there is a single “Autonomy” literally means giving the law fundamental principle of morality, on which all to oneself, and on Kant’s view our specific moral duties are based. He calls this moral law (as it is manifested to us) the categorical understanding provides laws that imperative . The moral law is a product of reason, constitute the a priori framework of our for Kant, while the basic laws of nature are experience. Our understanding does not products of our understanding. provide the matter or content of our experience, but it does provide the basic formal structure within which we experience any matter received through our senses. Kant’s central argument for this view is the transcendental deduction, according to which it is a condition of self- consciousness that our understanding constructs experience in this way. So we may call self-consciousness the highest principle of Kant’s theoretical philosophy, since it is (at least) the basis for all of our a priori knowledge about the structure of nature. philosophical (and sometimes analytical) behaviourism. Sometimes known as an “ordinary language”, sometimes as an “analytic” philosopher, Ryle—even when mentioned in the same breath as Wittgenstein and his followers—is considered to be on a different, somewhat idiosyncratic (and difficult to characterise), philosophical track. Philosophical behaviourism has No more inner selves, immortal long been rejected; what was souls, states of consciousness, worth keeping has been or unconscious entities: instead, appropriated by the the self is defined in terms of philosophical doctrine of the behavior that is presented functionalism, which is the most to the world, a view that is widely accepted view in known in psychology as philosophy of mind today. It is a behaviorism. view that is thought to have He described both body and saved the “reality” of the mental mind as a "field of causes and from the “eliminativist” or effects" “fictionalist” tendencies of behaviourism while acknowledging the insight (often attributed to Ryle) that the mental is importantly related to behavioural output or response (as well as to stimulus Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s work is commonly associated with the philosophical movement called existentialism and its intention to begin with an analysis of the concrete experiences, perceptions, and difficulties, of human existence. Mind, the symbolic level of Mind or consciousness form that Merleau-Ponty cannot be defined formally in identifies with the human, is terms of self-knowledge or organized not toward vital representation, then, but is goals but by the essentially engaged in the characteristic structures of structures and actions of the the human world: tools, human world and language, culture, and so on. encompasses all of the These are not originally diverse intentional encountered as things or orientations of human life. ideas, but rather as “significative intentions” embodied within the world. 1. Socrates 2. Plato 3. Augustine 4. Descartes 5. Hume 6. Kant 7. Ryle