Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Input

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Input in second

language learning

By Haiza
Sabrina
Ummi
What is input in L2 learning?
Input is operationally defined as oral and/or written of the target
language (TL) to which L2 learners are exposed through various
sources, and recognized by them as language input.

Two important elements of input :


1. Availability: The degree the input is available via different
sources

2. Accessibility: The extent the input is linguistically and


cognitively accessible to the learners
Various sources of input in SLA
Modified
speech
1. Authentic and pedagogic materials and books
L2
Native
learner
2. Foreigner talk: native-nonnative speaker talk speaker/
teacher/
learner
3. Teacher talk: student-teacher talk

4. Interlanguage talk: learner-learner talk

5. The learners’ own Interlanguage


Importance of input in L2 learning
Various SLA theories pinpoint the role of input but differ greatly in the importance that is
attached to it (Ellis, 2012):
Behaviorism theories Appropriate stimuli (learners are language
producing machines who look at correct models  imitate  practice  produce)
Input + reinforcement learning

Mentalist theories A trigger that sets off the internal learningprocessing,


and it is indeterminate by itself (poverty of stimulus).
(non-interactive) Input+ internal processing learning

Interactionist Theories Input is provided via social interaction


(interactive) Input + internal processing+ interaction(linguistic environment)
learning
Two broad views on input leading to
acquisition
Input is both necessary and sufficient for L2 acquisition
1. The frequency hypothesis
2. Input processing theory
3. Input hypothesis

Input is not sufficient on its own but interaction/output are also


required.
1. Interaction hypothesis
2. Comprehensible output hypothesis
3. Gass’ model of L2 acquisition (The most comprehensive
model available)
4. Sociocultural theory
The Frequency Hypothesis (Hatch and
Wagner Gough)
The Frequency Hypothesis the order of L2 acquisition is determined by
the frequency with which different linguistic items occur in the input (acquisition
is input dependent)
Input frequency enhance or lessen the form-function relationship by
providing cues.
What makes a cue useful

CueFrequency
availability Cue reliability Conflict validity

The extent to which a cue Whether a cue loses or wins


How often it is when it appears in competitive
always maps the same form
available in the input environments
onto the same function
Input processing theory (Vanpatten)
The idea behind it Acquisition is input dependent
The focus is on how learners process input and convert it into intake, and
hence how an internalized system develops.

Input-processing principles

1. Learners process input for meaning before they process it for form.

2. Learners process content words in the input before anything else.

3. Learners process lexical items before grammatical items (e.g.


morphological markings).

4. Learners prefer processing “more meaningful” morphology before


"less" or "non-meaningful" morphology.
Input hypothesis (Krashen)
Input hypothesis: The availability of (comprehensible) input (i + 1) is
the only necessary and sufficient condition for language acquisition
to take place.

Claims of input hypothesis:

1. Learner progress along natural order provided i+I input


2. Input becomes comprehensible as a result of simplification and
contextual and extralinguistic clues (pre-modified input)

3. Sufficient amount of comprehensible input is the main feature of


effective SLA.

4. Speaking is a result of acquisition and not its cause

You might also like