RCTQ

OBJECTIVES RCTQ

At the end of this activity, the

participants should be able to:
• Define and understand the
Portfolio Assessment Process
• Identify tools and forms to be
used in the assessment of
Teacher Portfolio
• Rate the Portfolio and compute
its rating
RCTQ
RCTQ
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
PROCES
RCTQ

I.
Performance
Planning &
Commitment

IV.
Pre-
Performance Assessment II.
Rewarding Performance
and Assessment Monitoring &
Development Coaching
Planning Post-
Assessment Done
Doneacross
across
III.
Performance
allallphases
phasesofof
Review & RPMS.
RPMS.
Evaluation
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
PROCES
RCTQ

I.
Performance
Planning &
Commitment

Pre-
Assessment
Steps in Pre-Assessment Phase RCTQ

• Review the
Philippine
Step 1 Professional
Standards for
Teachers

• Determine the
Step 2 corresponding
RPMS tool for
the teacher/ratee
Steps in Pre-Assessment Phase RCTQ

• Guide the Ratee in

understanding the
Step 3
appropriate RPMS
Tool and the IPCRF

• Advise the
Step 4 teacher/ratee to
accomplish the
IPCRF.
Steps in Pre-Assessment Phase RCTQ

• Guide the teachers in

Step 5 preparing documents
and organizing
Portfolio
• Upon
submission of
Step 6
the Teacher
Portfolio,
authenticate
documents
Steps in Pre-Assessment Phase RCTQ

II.
Performance
Assessment Monitoring &
Coaching

III.
Performance
Review &
Evaluation
RPMS TOOL for T-1-III (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for T-1-III (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for T-1-III (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for T-1-III (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for MT I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)
RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for MT I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)
RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for MT I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)
RCTQ
RPMS TOOL for MT I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)
RCTQ
IPCRF for T I-III (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
IPCRF for MT I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
 Steps in the Assessment Phase RCTQ

Step 1: Rate the Portfolio based on

the MOV presented.

Examine the MOV presented by the

teacher and rate the teacher’s level of
performance using the 5-point scale:

5 – Outstanding; 4 - Very Satisfactory;

3 – Satisfactory; 2 – Unsatisfactory;
1 - Poor
 RCTQ

For instance, in KRA1 - Objective

1 for Teacher I-III the Ratee has
targeted a Very Satisfactory
performance (Level 4).

KRA 1 - Content Knowledge & Pedagogy

Objective 1 - Applied knowledge of
content within and across curriculum
teaching areas
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Weight Performance
KRAObjectives
Timeline MOV
per Obj. Target
Content
1. AppliedJune 1.7.5
Classroom observation(Very
tool Satisfactory)
(COT)
rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Knowledge
knowledge2018- agreement form aboutShowed knowledgeof
knowledge
and of content
March of content within andcontentacross and its
curriculum teaching areas
integration within
Pedagogy
within and2019 2. Lesson plans/modifiedand DLLs
across subject
across developed highlighting
areas as shown in
integration of content(Ver
knowledge
MOV 1 with a
Satisfactory)
curriculum within and across subject areas.
Submitted
rating of 6 3
teaching 3. Instructional materialslessons using MOV
highlighting mastery of content
1 and supported
areas. and its integration in other
by any 1 of the
subject areas other given MOV
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
IPCRF (Proficient Teacher) pp.184
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Apply knowledge of content and

its integration within and across
subject areas as evidently
shown in 3 lessons using MOV 1
with an average rating of 6,
each supported by any one (1)
of the other given MOV.
IPCRF (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Sample School
Scenario for
Master Teachers
Teacher Grace, a Master Teacher II RCTQ

of Calauag East Central School,

submits her Portfolio for rating. She
includes the following MOV under
KRA 1 - Objective 1:
• Four (4) COT Rating Sheets with an
average Rating of Level 7 on
“Modeled effective applications of
content knowledge within and across
curriculum teaching areas”
- COT 1 is supported by 1 DLL used in RCTQ

demonstration teaching highlighting integration of

content knowledge within and across subject
areas;
- COT 2 is supported by 1 set of instructional
materials developed highlighting effective
application of content knowledge within and
across subject areas;
- COT 3 is supported by 1 performance task/test
material used in demonstration teaching across
subject areas; and
- COT 4 is supported by results of assessment used
in demonstration teaching highlighting mastery of
lessons learned
 RCTQ

What rating
should
Teacher Grace
get?
KRA 1- Objective 1: RCTQ

• Four (4) COT Rating Sheets

with an average Rating of
Level 7 on effective
applications of content
knowledge within and across
curriculum teaching areas for
4 lessons.
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

1)7 = 4
2)7 = 4
3)7 = 4
4)7 = 4
16 ÷ 4 = 4 16
RCTQ
- COT 1 is supported by 1 DLL used in RCTQ

demonstration teaching highlighting integration of

content knowledge within and across subject
areas;
- COT 2 is supported by 1 set of instructional
materials developed highlighting effective
application of content knowledge within and
across subject areas;
- COT 3 is supported by 1 performance task/test
material used in demonstration teaching across
subject areas; and
- COT 4 is supported by results of assessment used
in demonstration teaching highlighting mastery of
lessons learned
RCTQ
RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Therefore, Teacher Grace got a

rating of 4 for Quality by
submitting 4 COT rating sheets
with an average Rating of 7,
supported by DLLs,
Instructional Materials used,
Performance Tasks/Test
materials and Results of
Assessment.
 RCTQ

She also got a rating of

5 for Efficiency having
submitted the required
number of MOV.
 RCTQ

Weight
Q E T Total Average Rating
per Obj.

4 5 - 9 4.500 7.5% 0.337

 RCTQ

There are instances,

however, that Teachers may
submit CLASSROOM
OBSERVATION RATING
sheets that have
DIFFERENT RATINGS.
 RCTQ

A Teacher III may submit 4

COT rating sheets:
•COT 1 with a rating of 7;
•COT 2 with a rating of
6; 
•COT 3 and 4 with a
rating of 5. 
 RCTQ

To get the rating for Quality, the

following steps must be done: 
• Identify the corresponding
rating in the RPMS 5-point
scale for each COT rating.

(Refer to the table for the mapping of COT

Rating for Proficient Teachers and Highly
Proficient Teachers and their equivalent
rating in the RPMS 5-point scale)
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Get the average of the

total RPMS rating. The
average rating will be
your rating for Quality.
In Teacher III’s case, the
average is 3.75.
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Determine the final rating for

Quality by referring to the next
table.

Teacher III got an average of

3.75 and the final rating for
Quality is 4 (Very Satisfactory): 
RCTQ
Steps in the Assessment Phase RCTQ

Step 2: Explain your Rating, if

needed.
• help the Ratees enrich their
Portfolios
• provide reasons for your rating
• suggest strategies in improving the
quality of the
Portfolios.
Steps in the Assessment Phase RCTQ
 RCTQ

WORKSHO
P
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Instruction:
Following the portfolio
assessment process in the
RPMS Manual, rate the
provided Sample Portfolio
Scenarios using the RPMS
Tools and forms.
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

• Each Table will be given an activity

sheet with two (2) different
scenarios.
• The group will answer all scenarios
for 10 minutes.
• Presenters will be done by drawing
of lots using the suggested format
while other groups will submit their
output in the manila paper.
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Mark, Teacher III, submitted the

following MOV for KRA 1, Objective 1:
 4 COT Rating Sheets
 COT 1 has a rating of 6, COT 2 and 3 are rated
5; and COT 4 has a rating of 7
 COT 1, 2 and 3 are each supported by Lesson
plans/ modified DLLs developed highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
 COT 4 is supported by Test materials
highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas

What rating should Teacher Mark get?

RCTQ
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Mark, Teacher III, submitted the

following MOV for KRA 1, Objective 1:
 4 COT Rating Sheets
COT 1 has a rating of 6,
COT 2 and 3 are rated 5;
and COT 4 has a rating of 7
 COT 1, 2 and 3 are each supported by Lesson plans/ modified
DLLs developed highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
 COT 4 is supported by Test materials highlighting integration of
content knowledge within and across subject areas

What rating should Teacher Mark get?

RCTQ
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

6 = 4
5 = 3
5 = 3
7 = 5 15

15 ÷ 4 = 3.75
RCTQ
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Mark, Teacher III, submitted the

following MOV for KRA 1, Objective 1:
• 4 COT Rating Sheets
 COT 1 has a rating of 5, COT 2 and 3 are
rated 6; and COT 4 has a rating of 7
 COT 1, 2 and 3 are each supported by
Lesson plans/ modified DLLs developed
highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas
 COT 4 is supported by Test materials
highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

What rating should Teacher Mark get?

RCTQ
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight RATING
per Score
Objective Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 4 5 - 9 4.500 0.337

 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Gerlie, Master Teacher I,

submitted the following MOV for Objective
4, KRA 2:
• 3 COT Rating sheets with the rating of 8,
6 and 7
• 3 Lessons plans/ modified DLLs
highlighting various classroom
management strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks in different
physical learning environments as
support for each COT rating sheets

What rating should Teacher Gerlie get?

RCTQ
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Gerlie, Master Teacher I, submitted

the following MOV for Objective 4, KRA 2:
• 3 COT Rating sheets
with the rating of 8, 6
and 7
• 3 Lessons plans/ modified DLLs highlighting various
classroom management strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks in different physical
learning environments as support for each COT rating
sheets
 RCTQ

COT Rating RPMS 5-Point Scale Rating

8 = 5
6 = 3
7 = 4
12 ÷ 3 = 412
RCTQ
 WORKSHOP RCTQ

Teacher Gerlie, Master Teacher I,

submitted the following MOV for Objective
4, KRA 2:
• 3 COT Rating sheets with the rating of 8, 6 and 7
• 3 Lessons plans/ modified DLLs
highlighting various classroom
management strategies that
engage learners in activities/tasks
in different physical learning
environments as support for each
COT rating sheets
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Weight
RATING
per Score
Objective Q E T Total Average

7.5 % 4 4 - 8 4.000 0.300

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How to
compute the
Portfolio
Rating?
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Each objective shall be assigned

7.5% weight, which means each
KRA will have an equal weight of
22.5%. The Plus Factor KRA,
which consists of only one
objective, will be assigned 10%
weight.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 1.
Under the
column
Numerical
Ratings,
write your
ratings for
QET.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 2.
Get the
average.
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 3.
Multiply the
Weight per
Objective
with the
QET average
to fill in the
SCORE
column. The
scores shall
be in three
(3) decimal
places.
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 4.
Add all the
scores to
compute
for the
Final
Rating,
which is
also in
three (3)
decimal
places.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 6. Write
the overall
rating for
accomplish-
ments in the
IPRCF. Affix
signature of
the Rater,
Ratee and
the
Approving
Authority.
IPCRF (Proficient Teacher) RCTQ

Showed Showed
knowledge knowledge
of content of content
June and its and its
2018- integration integration
March 7.5 within and within and .
2019 across across 3 3 3 225
subject subject
areas as areas as
shown in shown in
MOV 1 w/ MOV 1 w/
a rating of 5 a rating of 5
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Rating for Over-

all Very 4.225
Satisfactory
Accomplishments

3.500 - 4.499 Very

Satisfactory

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Mid-year
Review
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

• Assess the Teacher

Portfolio using the
Step 1
IPCRF and the
suggested Mid-year
Review Form (MRF).

• Conduct Mid-year
Step 2 assessment conference
to discuss your initial
ratings with the Ratees.
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Weight Performance
KRAObjectives
Timeline MOV
per Obj. Target
Content
1. AppliedJune 1.7.5
Classroom observationShowed
tool (COT)
rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Knowledge
knowledge2018- agreement form aboutknowledge knowledge
content
of
and its
and of content
March of content within andintegration
across within
curriculum teaching areas
and across subject
Pedagogy
within and2019 2. Lesson plans/modifiedareas DLLsas shown in
across developed highlightingMOV 1 with a
integration of contentSubmitted
knowledge
rating of 6 3
curriculum within and across subject areas.
lessons using MOV
teaching 3. Instructional materials1 and supported
highlighting mastery ofbycontent
any 1 of the
areas. and its integration in other given MOV
subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

• Discuss with the Ratees

Step their respective
3 performance concerns.

• Monitor teacher
performance and coach
them using the
Step
Performance Monitoring
4 and Coaching Form (PMCF)
and/or Midyear Review
Form (MRF).
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

How do you
assess the
Competencies?
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

• During the RPMS Phase 1, the Rater

shall discuss with the Ratee the
competencies required.
• Demonstration of these
competencies shall be monitored to
effectively plan the interventions
needed for the development plans
and shall be assessed at the end of
the year.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

Step 1: Discuss with the

Ratee the set of
competencies.

Step 2:
Assess the demonstration
of competencies.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ
PART II: RCTQ

COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCI RCTQ

ES
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

IV.
Performance
Rewarding Post-
and
Development Assessment
Planning
STEPS IN PREPARING DEVELOPMENT
PLANS
RCTQ

1. Identify the development

needs.
2. Set goals for meeting the
development needs.
3. Prepare action plans for
meeting the development needs
4. Implement action plans.
5. Evaluate.
 IPCRF - DP RCTQ

Objective 9, KRA 3
Selected, developed, organized
and used appropriate teaching
and learning resources,
including ICT, to address
learning goals.
DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES
RCTQ

Geographical Seminars/
cross posting workshops

Coaching/
Benchmarking
Counseling

Functional Formal
cross posting education/
classes
Job Developmental/
enhancement/ lateral career
redesign move

Assignment to task forces/committees/

special projects
70 - 20 - 10 Learning
Model
RCTQ
70 - 20 - 10 Learning Model
Examples
RCTQ

70 - Learn and Develop

through Experience
• Applying new learning in real situations
• Using feedback to try a new approach to
an old problem
• Trying new work and solving problems
within role
• Having increased span of control
• Having increased decision-making
• Becoming champion and/or managing
changes
 70 - 20 - 10 Learning Model
Examples
RCTQ

20 - Learn and Develop

through Others
• Seeking informal feedback and work debriefs
• Seeking advice, asking opinions, sounding out
ideas
• Requesting coaching from
manager/others
• Getting 360° feedback
• Undergoing structured mentoring and
coaching
• Participating in Learning Action Cells (LAC)
 70 - 20 - 10 Learning Model
Examples
RCTQ

10 - Learn and Develop through

Structured Courses and Programs
(Formal Education)
• Learning through:
- courses
- workshops
- seminars
- e-learning
• Applying for professional
qualifications/accreditation
 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT PROCESS
RCTQ

PRE-ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
PRE-ASSESSMENT POST-ASSESSMENT
PHASE
PHASE PHASE
(Documents/Forms:
(Documents/Forms:
(Documents/Forms:, PHASE
RPMS Portfolio
Teacher RPMS Portfolio (Documents/Forms: IPCRF
PPST,
PPST,RPMS
RPMSTools,
Tools,IPCRF,
IPCRF,
Teacher appropriate RPMS Tool & & IPCRF - DP)
TeacherRPMS
RPMSPortfolio)
Portfolio) IPCRF)
IPCRF)
1.1. Review
ReviewthethePPST
PPST
2.2. Determine
Determinethe the
corresponding
correspondingtool toolfor
for
the
theteacher/Ratee:
teacher/Ratee: 1.
1. Rate
Rate the
the Portfolio
Portfolio
•• RPMS
RPMSToolTool based
based on the
on the MOV
MOV Mid-Year
presented. 1. Discuss with
(Proficient
(Proficient presented. Rate Rate the
the Review
Teacher)
Teacher) teacher’s level
teacher’s level of of teacher his/her
•• RPMS (Documents/F Year-End
RPMSToolTool performance
performance using using performance
(Highly
(Highly the orms:, Teacher Review
the 5-point
5-point scale:
scale: data and agree
Proficient
Proficient 55 -- Outstanding
Outstanding RPMS (Documents/
Teacher)
Teacher) on the ratings
44 -- Very
Very Portfolio, Forms: IPCRF
3.3. Guide
Guidethe
the Satisfactory 2. Assist the
teacher/Ratee
teacher/Rateein in Satisfactory RPMS Tool, & IPCRF - DP)
33 -- Satisfactory
Satisfactory
teacher in
understanding
understandingthe the IPCRF &
appropriate
22 -- preparing the
appropriateRPMSRPMStool
tool PMCF)
&&the
theIPCRF
IPCRFformform Unsatisfactory
Unsatisfactory Development
4.4. Guide
Guidethe
theteachers
teachersinin 11 –– Poor.
Poor. Plans.
preparing documents
preparing documents 2.
2. Explain the
Explain the Rating
Rating ifif
&&organizing
organizingPortfolo
Portfolo needed
needed
5.5. Upon
Uponsubmission
submissionof of
Portfolio
Portfolioauthenticate
authenticate
documents
documents
RCTQ
 RCTQ

Division of Negros
Occidental
 RCTQ

Love & Kisses…….

RPMS, PPST & IPCRF
RCTQ