Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Dynamics of Local: and Global Culture

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

DYNAMICS OF LOCAL

AND GLOBAL CULTURE


Global flows of culture…
…tend to move more easily around the globe than ever
more, especially through non-material digital forms.
There are 3 perspectives or approaches of global
cultural flows:
1. Differentialism
2. Hybridization, and
3. Convergence
Cultural Differentialism
Emphasizes the fact that cultures are essentially
different and are only superficially affected by
global flows.
The interaction of cultures is deemed to contain
the potential for “catastrophic collision.”
Huntington’s theory on the clash of the civilization
proposed in 1996 best exemplifies this
(“catastrophic collision”) approach.
Cultural Differentialism
According to Huntington (2004), after the Cold War,
political-economic differences were overshadowed by
new fault lines, which were primarily cultural in
nature, increasing interactions among different
“civilizations” (such as the Sinic, Islamic, Orthodox,
and Western) would lead to intense clashes,
especially the economic conflict between the Western
and Sinic civilizations and bloody political conflict
between the Western and Islamic civilizations.
Cultural Differentialism
This theory has been critiqued
for a number of reasons,
especially on its portrayal of
Muslims as being “prone to
violence” (Huntington, 1996)
Cultural Hybridization
Emphasizes the integration of local and global cultures
(Cvetkovich and Kellner, 1997).
Globalization is considered to be a creative process
which gives rise to hybrid entities that are not
reducible to either the global or the local .
The key concept is “glocalization” or the
interpenetration of the global and local resulting in
unique outcomes in different geographic areas
(Giulianotti and Robertson, 2007, p.133)
Cultural Hybridization
Another key concept is Arjun
Appadurai’s “scapes” in 1996, where
global flows involve people, technology,
finance, political images, and media and
the disjunctures between them, which
lead to the creation of cultural hybrids.
Cultural Convergence
Stresses homogeneity introduced by
globalization.
Cultures are deemed to be radically
altered by strong flows, while cultural
imperialism happens when one culture
imposes itself on and tends to destroy at
least parts of another culture.
Cultural Convergence
One important critique of cultural
imperialism is John Tomlinson’s idea of
“deterritorialization” of culture.

Means that it is much more difficult to


tie culture to a specific geographic point
of origin.

You might also like