There are three perspectives on global cultural flows: differentialism, hybridization, and convergence. Differentialism emphasizes that cultures remain essentially different and interactions may lead to conflict. Hybridization focuses on the integration of local and global cultures resulting in unique blended outcomes. Convergence stresses homogeneity and dominance of one culture over others through globalization.
There are three perspectives on global cultural flows: differentialism, hybridization, and convergence. Differentialism emphasizes that cultures remain essentially different and interactions may lead to conflict. Hybridization focuses on the integration of local and global cultures resulting in unique blended outcomes. Convergence stresses homogeneity and dominance of one culture over others through globalization.
There are three perspectives on global cultural flows: differentialism, hybridization, and convergence. Differentialism emphasizes that cultures remain essentially different and interactions may lead to conflict. Hybridization focuses on the integration of local and global cultures resulting in unique blended outcomes. Convergence stresses homogeneity and dominance of one culture over others through globalization.
There are three perspectives on global cultural flows: differentialism, hybridization, and convergence. Differentialism emphasizes that cultures remain essentially different and interactions may lead to conflict. Hybridization focuses on the integration of local and global cultures resulting in unique blended outcomes. Convergence stresses homogeneity and dominance of one culture over others through globalization.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
DYNAMICS OF LOCAL
AND GLOBAL CULTURE
Global flows of culture… …tend to move more easily around the globe than ever more, especially through non-material digital forms. There are 3 perspectives or approaches of global cultural flows: 1. Differentialism 2. Hybridization, and 3. Convergence Cultural Differentialism Emphasizes the fact that cultures are essentially different and are only superficially affected by global flows. The interaction of cultures is deemed to contain the potential for “catastrophic collision.” Huntington’s theory on the clash of the civilization proposed in 1996 best exemplifies this (“catastrophic collision”) approach. Cultural Differentialism According to Huntington (2004), after the Cold War, political-economic differences were overshadowed by new fault lines, which were primarily cultural in nature, increasing interactions among different “civilizations” (such as the Sinic, Islamic, Orthodox, and Western) would lead to intense clashes, especially the economic conflict between the Western and Sinic civilizations and bloody political conflict between the Western and Islamic civilizations. Cultural Differentialism This theory has been critiqued for a number of reasons, especially on its portrayal of Muslims as being “prone to violence” (Huntington, 1996) Cultural Hybridization Emphasizes the integration of local and global cultures (Cvetkovich and Kellner, 1997). Globalization is considered to be a creative process which gives rise to hybrid entities that are not reducible to either the global or the local . The key concept is “glocalization” or the interpenetration of the global and local resulting in unique outcomes in different geographic areas (Giulianotti and Robertson, 2007, p.133) Cultural Hybridization Another key concept is Arjun Appadurai’s “scapes” in 1996, where global flows involve people, technology, finance, political images, and media and the disjunctures between them, which lead to the creation of cultural hybrids. Cultural Convergence Stresses homogeneity introduced by globalization. Cultures are deemed to be radically altered by strong flows, while cultural imperialism happens when one culture imposes itself on and tends to destroy at least parts of another culture. Cultural Convergence One important critique of cultural imperialism is John Tomlinson’s idea of “deterritorialization” of culture.
Means that it is much more difficult to
tie culture to a specific geographic point of origin.