Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
220 views

General Linear Transformations

The document discusses linear transformations and provides 13 examples of linear transformations. It defines a linear transformation as a function between vector spaces that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. Some key examples include the zero transformation, identity operator, dilation and contraction operators, and orthogonal projections. The document also discusses properties of linear transformations, finding linear transformations from images of basis vectors, and how composition of two linear transformations is also a linear transformation.

Uploaded by

Julius
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
220 views

General Linear Transformations

The document discusses linear transformations and provides 13 examples of linear transformations. It defines a linear transformation as a function between vector spaces that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. Some key examples include the zero transformation, identity operator, dilation and contraction operators, and orthogonal projections. The document also discusses properties of linear transformations, finding linear transformations from images of basis vectors, and how composition of two linear transformations is also a linear transformation.

Uploaded by

Julius
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 67

8.

1 General Linear Transformation


Definition
If T: V→W is a function from a vector space V into a vector
space W, then T is called a linear transformation from
V to W if for all vectors u and v in V and all scalors c

 T (u+v) = T (u) + T (v)


 T (cu) = cT (u)

In the special case where V=W, the linear transformation


T:V→V is called a linear operator on V.
Example 2
Zero Transformation
The mapping T:V→W such that T (v)=0 for every v in V is
a linear transformation called the zero transformation.
To see that T is linear, observe that

T (u+v) = 0. T (u) = 0, T (v) = 0. And T (k u) = 0

Therefore,

T (u+v) =T (u) +T (v) and T (k u) = kT (u)


Example3
Identify Operator

The mapping I: V→V defined by I (v) =


v is called the identify operator on V.
Example 4
Dilation and Contraction operators
Let V be any vector space and k any fixed scalar. The
function T:V→V defined by
T (v) = k v
is linear operator on V.

 Dilation: k > 1
 Contraction: 0 < k < 1
Dilation and Contraction operators
Example 5
Orthogonal Projections
Suppose that W is a finite-dimensional subspace of an
inner product space V ; then the orthogonal
projection of V onto W is the transformation
defined by
T (v ) = projwv
that if
S = {w1, w2, …, wr}
is any orthogonal basis for W, then T (v ) is given by the formula
T (v ) = projwv = <v,w1>w1 + <v,w2>w2 +…+<v,wr>wr
The proof that T is a linear transformation follows from properties
of the inner product.
For example,
T (u+v) = <u+v, w1>w1 + <u+v, w2>w2 +… +<u+v, wr> wr
= <u, w1>w1 + <u, w2>w2 +… + <u, wr>wr
+ <v, w1>w1 + <v, w2>w2 +… + <v, wr>wr
= T (u) + T (v)
Simarly, T (ku) = kT (u)
Example 6
Computing an Orthogonal Projection
Let V = R3 have the Euclidean inner product. The vector w1 =
(1,0,0) and w2 = (0,1,0) from an orthogonal basis for the xy-
plane. If v = (x,y,z) is any vector in R3 , the orthogonal
projection of R3 onto the xy-plane is given by
T (v ) = <v, w1>w1 + <v, w2>w2
= x (1, 0, 0) + y (0, 1, 0)
= ( x, y, 0 )
Example 7
A Linear Transformation from a space V to Rn

Let S = {w1 , w2 , …, wn } be a basis for an n-dimensional


vector space V, and let
(v)s = (k1, k2, …, kn )

Be the coordinate vector relative to S of a vector v in V;


thus
v = k1 w + k2 w2 + …+ kn wn

Define T: V→Rn to be the function that maps v into its


coordinate vector relative to S; that is,
T (v) = (v)s = (k1, k2, …, kn )
The function T is linear transformation. To see that this is so,
suppose that u and v are vectors in V and that
u = c1 w1+ c2 w2+ …+ cn wn and
v = d1 w1+ d2 w2+ …+ dn wn
Thus,
(u)s = (c1, c2, …, cn ) and (v)s = (d1, d2, …, dn )
But
u+v = (c1+d1) w1+ (c2+d2) w2+…+ (cn+dn) wn
k u = (kc1) w1 +(kc2) w2 +…+ (kcn) wn
So that
(u+v)s = (c1+d1, c2+d2 …, cn+dn )
(k u)s = (kc1, kc2, …, kcn )
Therefore,
(u+v)s = (u)s + (v)s and (k u)s = k (u)s
Expressing these equations of T, we obtain
T (u+v) = T (u) + T (v) and T (k u) = kT (u)
Which shows that T is a linear transformation.

REMARK. The computations in preceding example could


just as well have been performed using coordinate
matrices rather than coordinate vectors; that is ,
[u+v] = [u]s +[v]s and [k u]s = k [u]s
Example 8
A Linear Transformation from pn to pn+1

Let p = p(x) = C0 X + C1X2 + …+ CnX n+1 be a polynomial in Pn , and


define the function T: Pn → Pn+1 by

T (p) = T (p(x)) = xp(x)= C0 X + C1X2 + …+ CnX n+1

The function T is a linear transformation, since for any scalar k


and any polynomials p1 and p2 in Pn we have
T (p1+p2) = T (p1(x) + p2 (x)) = x (p1(x)+p2 (x))
= x p1 (x) + x p2 (x) = T (p1) +T (p2)
 and
T (k p) = T (k p(x)) = x (k p(x))= k (x p(x))= k T(p)
Example 9
A linear Operator on Pn
Let p = p(x) = c0 X + c1X2 + …+ cnX n+1 be a polynomial
in Pn , and let a and b be any scalars. We leave it as
an exercise to show that the function T defined by
T (p) = T(p(x)) = p (ax+b) = c0 + c1 (ax+b) + …+
cn(ax+b) n

is a linear operator. For example, if ax+b = 3x – 5, then


T: P2 → P2 would be the linear operator given by the
formula
T (c0 + c1x+ c2 x2 ) = c0 + c1 (3x-5) + c2 (3x-5) 2
Example 10
A Linear Transformation Using an Inner Product

Let V be an inner product space and let v0 be any fixed


vector in V. Let T:V→R be the transformation that
maps a vector v into its inner product with v0 ;
that is,
T (v) = <v, v0>
From the properties of an inner product
T (u+v) = <u+v, v0>= <u, v0> + <v, v0>
and
T (k u) = <k u, v0 > = k <u, v0 > = kT (u)
So that T is a linear transformation.
Example 11

A Linear Transformation from C1(-∞,∞) to F (-∞,∞)

Let V = C1(-∞,∞) be the vector space of functions with


continuous first derivatives on (-∞,∞) and let W = F
(-∞,∞) be the vector space of all real-valued
functions defined on (-∞,∞).
Let D:V→W be the transformation that maps a function
f = f (x) into its derivative; that is,
D (f) = f’ (x)
From the properties of differentiation, we have
D (f+g) = D (f)+D (g) and D (k f) = kD (f)
Thus, D is a linear transformation.
Example 12
A Linear Transformation from C (-∞,∞) to C1(-∞,∞)

Let V = C (-∞,∞) be the vector space of


continuous functions on (-∞,∞) and let W =
C1(-∞,∞) be the vector space of functions
with continuous first derivatives on (-∞,∞).
Let J:V→W be the transformation x
that maps a
f = f (x) into the integral 0 f (t ) dt . For
example, if f=x2 , then
x
J (f) =  t2dt =
0
From the properties of integration, we have
x x x
J (f+g) = 0 ( f (t )  g (t ))dt = 0 f (t )dt + 
0
g (t )dt
= J (f) + J (g)

x x
J (c f) = 0 cf (t )dt = c  f (t )dt = cJ (f)
0

So J is a linear transformation.
Example 13
A Transformation That Is Not Linear

Let T:Mnn →R be the transformation that maps an n × n


matrix into its determinant; that is,
T (A) = det (A)
If n>1, then this transformation does not satisfy either
of the properties required of a linear transformation.
For example, we saw Example 1 of Section 2.3 that
det (A1+A2) ≠ det (A1) + det (A2)
in general. Moreover, det (cA) =C n det (A), so
det (cA) ≠ c det (A)
in general. Thus, T is not linear transformation.
Properties of Linear Transformation
If T:V→W is a linear transformation, then for any vectors v1 and
v2 in V and any scalars c1 and c2 , we have
T (c1 v1 + c2 v2) = T (c1 v1 ) + T (c2 v2) = c1T (v1 ) + c2T (v2)

and more generally, if v1 , v2 , …, vn are vectors in V and c1 , c2 , …,


cn are scalars, then
T (c1 v1 + c2 v2 +…+ cn vn ) =
c1T (v1 ) + c2T ( v2 ) +…+ cnT ( vn ) (1)

Formula (1) is sometimes described by saying that linear


transformations preserve linear combinations.
Theorem 8.1.1
If T:V→W is a linear transformation, then:
(a) T (0) = 0
(b) T (-v ) = -T (v ) for all v in V

(c) T (v-w ) = T (v ) - T (w) for all v and w in


V
Proof.
(a) Let v be any vector in V. Since 0v=0, we have
T (0)=T (0v)=0T (v)=0

(b) T (-v) = T ((-1)v) = (-1)T (v)=-T (v)

(c) v-w=v+(-1)w; thus,


T (v-w)= T (v + (-1)w) = T (v) + (-1)T (w)
= T (v) -T (w)
Finding Linear Transformations from
Images of Basis
If T:V→W is a linear transformation, and if {v1 , v2 , …, vn }
is any basis for V, then the image T (v) of any vector v
in V can be calculated from images
T (v1), T (v2), …, T (vn)
of the basis vectors. This can be done by first expressing v
as a linear combination of the basis vectors, say
v = c1 v1+ c2 v2+ …+ cn vn
and then using Formula(1) to write
T (v) = c1 T (v1) + c2 T (v2) + … + cn T (vn)
In words, a linear transformation is completely
determined by its images of any basis vectors.
Example 14
Computing with Images of Basis Vectors
Consider the basis S = {v1 , v2 , v3 } for R3 ,
where v1 = (1,1,1), v2 =(1,1,0), and v3 =
(1,0,0). Let T: R3 →R2 be the linear
transformation such that
T (v1)=(1,0), T (v2)=(2,-1), T (v3)=(4,3)

Find a formula for T (x1 , x2 , x3 ); then use this


formula to compute T (2,-3,5).
Solution.
We first express x = (x1 , x2 , x3 ) as a linear combination of v1
=(1,1,1), v2 =(1,1,0), and v3 = (1,0,0). If we write
(x1 , x2 , x3 ) = c1 (1,1,1) + c2 (1,1,0) + c3 (1,0,0)

then on equating corresponding components we obtain


c1 + c2 + c3 = x1
c1 + c2 = x2
c1 = x3
which yields c1 = x3 , c2 = x2 - x3 , c3 = x1 - x2 , so that

(x1 , x2 , x3 ) = x3 (1,1,1) + (x2 - x3 ) (1,1,0) + (x1 - x2 ) (1,0,0)


= x3 v1 + (x2 - x3 ) v2 + (x1 - x2 ) v3
Thus,
T (x1 , x2 , x3 ) = x3 T (v1) + (x2 - x3 ) T (v2) + (x1 - x2 ) T (v3)
= x3 (1,0) + (x2 - x3 ) (2,-1) + (x1 - x2 ) (4,3)
= (4x1 -2x2 -x3 , 3x1 - 4x2 +x3)

From this formula we obtain


T (2 , -3 , 5 ) =(9,23)
Composition of T2 with T1
If T1 :U→V and T2 :V→W are linear
transformations, the composition of T2 with T1
, denoted by T2 。 T1 (read “T2 circle T1 ”), is
the function defined by the formula

(T2 。 T1 )(u) = T2 (T1 (u)) (2)

where u is a vector in U
 Theorem 8.1.2
If T1 :U→V and T2 :V→W are linear
transformations, then (T2 。 T1 ):U→W is also
a linear transformation.
Proof. If u and v are vectors in U and c is a scalar, then it follows
from (2) and the linearity of T1 andT2 that
(T2 。 T1 )(u+v) = T2 (T1(u+v)) = T2 (T1(u)+T1 (v))
= T2 (T1(u)) + T2 (T1(v))
= (T2 。 T1 )(u) + (T2 。 T1 )(v)
and
(T2 。 T1 )(c u) = T2 (T1 (c u)) = T2 (cT1(u))
= cT2 (T1 (u)) = c (T2 。 T1 )(u)

Thus, T2 。 T1 satisfies the two requirements of a linear


transformation.
Example 15
Composition of Linear Transformations
Let T1 : P1 → P1 and T2 : P2 → P2 be the linear transformations given
by the formulas
T1(p(x)) = xp(x) and T2 (p(x)) = p (2x+4)

Then the composition is (T2 。 T1 ): P1 → P2 is given by the formula


(T2 。 T1 )(p(x)) = (T2)(T1(p(x))) = T2 (xp(x)) = (2x+4)p (2x+4)

In particular, if p(x) = c0 + c1 x, then


(T2 。 T1 )(p(x)) = (T2 。 T1 )(c0 + c1 x)
= (2x+4) (c0 + c1 (2x+4))
= c0 (2x+4) + c1 (2x+4)2
Example 16
Composition with the Identify Operator
If T:V→V is any linear operator, and if I:V→V is the
identity operator, then for all vectors v in V we have
(T 。 I )(v) = T (I (v)) = T (v)
(I 。 T )(v) = I (T (v)) = T (v)
It follows that T 。 I and I 。 T are the same as T ; that is,
T 。 I=T and I 。 T = T (3)

We conclude this section by noting that compositions can be


defined for more than two linear transformations. For
example, if
T1 : U → V and T2 : V→ W ,and T3 : W→ Y
are linear transformations, then the composition
T3 。 T2 。 T1 is defined by
(T3 。 T2 。 T1 )(u) = T3 (T2 (T1 (u))) (4)
8.2 Kernel And Range
Definition
 ker(T ): the kernel of T
If T:V→W is a linear transformation, then the
set of vectors in V that T maps into 0

 R (T ): the range of T
The set of all vectors in W that are images
under T of at least one vector in V
Example 1
Kernel and Range of a Matrix Transformation

If TA :Rn →Rm is multiplication by the m×n


matrix A, then from the discussion
preceding the definition above,

 the kernel of TA is the nullspace of A

 the range of TA is the column space of A


Example 2
Kernel and Range of the Zero Transformation

Let T:V→W be the zero transformation.


Since T maps every vector in V into 0,
it follows that ker(T ) = V.

Moreover, since 0 is the only image


under T of vectors in V, we have R (T )
= {0}.
Example 3
Kernel and Range of the Identity Operator

Let I:V→V be the identity operator. Since


I (v) = v for all vectors in V, every
vector in V is the image of some
vector; thus, R(I ) = V.

Since the only vector that I maps into 0


is 0, it follows that ker(I ) = {0}.
Example 4
Kernel and Range of an Orthogonal Projection

Let T: R3 →R3 be the orthogonal projection on the xy-


plane. The kernel of T is the set of points that T
maps into 0 = (0,0,0); these are the points on the z-
axis.
Since T maps every points in R3 into the xy-plane, the range
of T must be some subset of this plane. But every point
(x0 ,y0 ,0) in the xy-plane is the image under T of some
point; in fact, it is the image of all points on the vertical
line that passes through (x0 ,y0 , 0). Thus R(T ) is the
entire xy-plane.
Example 5
Kernel and Range of a Rotation
Let T: R2 →R2 be the linear operator that rotates each vector
in the xy-plane through the angle θ. Since every vector in
the xy-plane can be obtained by rotating through some
vector through angle θ, we have R(T ) = R2 . Moreover,
the only vector that rotates into 0 is 0, so ker(T ) = {0}.
Example 6
Kernel of a Differentiation Transformation

Let V= C1 (-∞,∞) be the vector space of functions with


continuous first derivatives on (-∞,∞) , let W = F (-
∞,∞) be the vector space of all real-valued functions
defined on (-∞,∞) , and let D:V→W be the
differentiation transformation D (f) = f’(x).

The kernel of D is the set of functions in V with


derivative zero. From calculus, this is the set of
constant functions on (-∞,∞) .
 Theorem 8.2.1
If T:V→W is linear transformation, then:

(a) The kernel of T is a subspace of V.


(b) The range of T is a subspace of W.
Proof (a).
Let v1 and v2 be vectors in ker(T ), and let k be any
scalar. Then
T (v1 + v2) = T (v1) + T (v2) = 0+0 = 0
so that v1 + v2 is in ker(T ).

Also,
T (k v1) = kT (v1) = k 0 = 0
so that k v1 is in ker(T ).
Proof (b).
Let w1 and w2 be vectors in the range of T , and let k
be any scalar. There are vectors a1 and a2 in V such
that T (a1) = w1 and T(a2) = w2 . Let a = a1 + a2
and b = k a1 .
Then
T (a) = T (a1 + a2) = T (a1) + T (a2) = w1 + w2
and
T (b) = T (k a1) = kT (a1) = k w1
Definition
 nank (T): the rank of T
If T:V→W is a linear transformation,
then the dimension of tha range of T is
the rank of T .

nullity (T): the nullity of T


the dimension of the kernel is the nullity
of T.
 Theorem 8.2.2
If A is an m×n matrix and TA :Rn →Rm is
multiplication by A , then:
(a) nullity (TA ) = nullity (A )

(b) rank (TA ) = rank (A )


Example 7
Finding Rank and Nullity

Let TA :R6 →R4 be multiplication by

 1 2 0 4 5  3
 3 7 2 0 1 4 
A=  
 2 5 2 4 6 1
 
 4 9 2 4 4 7 

Find the rank and nullity of TA


Solution.
In Example 1 of Section 5.6 we showed
that rank (A ) = 2 and nullity (A ) = 4.
Thus, from Theorem 8.2.2 we have
rank (TA ) = 2 and nullity (TA ) = 4.
Example 8
Finding Rank and Nullity

Let T: R3 →R3 be the orthogonal


projection on the xy-plane. From
Example 4, the kernel of T is the z-
axis, which is one-dimensional; and the
range of T is the xy-plane, which is
two-dimensional. Thus,
nullity (T ) = 1 and rank (T ) = 2
Dimension Theorem for Linear Transformations
 Theorem 8.2.3
If T:V→W is a linear transformation from an n-
dimensional vector space V to a vector space W, then

rank (T ) + nullity (T ) = n

In words, this theorem states that for linear


transformations the rank plus the nullity is equal to
the dimension of the domain.
Example 9
Using the Dimension Theorem
Let T: R2 →R2 be the linear operator that rotates
each vector in the xy-plane through an angle θ .
We showed in Example 5 that ker(T ) = {0} and
R (T ) = R2 .Thus,

rank (T ) + nullity (T ) = 2 + 0 = 2

Which is consistent with the fact thar the domain of


T is two-dimensional.
8.3 Inverse Linear Transformations
Definition
 one-to-one
A linear transformation T:V→W is said to
be one-to-one if T maps distinct
vectors in V into distinct vectors in W .
Example 1
A One-to-One Linear Transformation

Recall from Theorem 4.3.1 that if A is an


n×n matrix and TA :Rn→Rn is
multiplication by A , then TA is one-to-
one if and only if A is an invertible
matrix.
Example 2
A One-to-One Linear Transformation
Let T: Pn → Pn+1 be the linear transformation
T (p) = T(p(x)) = xp(x)
Discussed in Example 8 of Section 8.1. If
p = p(x) = c0 + c1 x +…+ cn xn and
q = q(x) = d0 + d1 x +…+ dn xn
are distinct polynomials, then they differ in at least one
coefficient. Thus,
T(p) = c0 x + c1 x2 +…+ cn xn+1 and
T(q) = d0 x + d1 x2 +…+ dn xn+1
Also differ in at least one coefficient. Thus, since it maps distinct
polynomials p and q into distinct polynomials T (p) and T (q).
Example 3
A Transformation That Is Not One-to-One
Let
D: C1(-∞,∞) → F (-∞,∞)
be the differentiation transformation discussed in
Example 11 of Section 8.1. This linear transformation
is not one-to-one because it maps functions that
differ by a constant into the same function. For
example,

D(x2) = D(xn +1) = 2x


Equivalent Statements
 Theorem 8.3.1
If T:V→W is a linear transformation, then the
following are equivalent.

(a) T is one-to-one
(b) The kernel of T contains only zero vector;
that is , ker(T) = {0}
(c) Nullity (T) = 0
Theorem 8.3.2
If V is a finite-dimensional vector space and
T:V ->V is a linear operator then the following
are equivalent.

(a)T is one to one


(b) ker(T) = {0}
(c)nullity(T) = 0
(d)The range of T is V;that is ,R(T) =V
Example 5
Let T A:R 4 -> R 4 be multiplication by
1 3  2 4
2 6  4 8 

A= 3 9 1 5
 
1 1 4 8

Determine whether T A is one to one.


Example 5(Cont.)
Solution:
det(A)=0,since the first two rows of A

are proportional and consequently A I


is not invertible.Thus, T A is not one
to one.
Inverse Linear Transformations
If T :V -> W is a linear transformation,
denoted by R (T ),is the subspace of W
consisting of all images under T of vector
in V.

If T is one to one,then each vector w in


R(T ) is the image of a unique vector v in V.
Inverse Linear Transformations
This uniqueness allows us to define a new
function,call the inverse of T. denoted
by T –1.which maps w back into v(Fig 8.3.1).
Inverse Linear Transformations
T –1:R (T ) -> V is a linear transformation.
Moreover,it follows from the defined of T –1 that

T –1(T (v)) = T –1(w) = v (2a)


T –1(T (w)) = T –1(v) = w (2b)

so that T and T –1,when applied in succession in


either the effect of one another.
Example 7
Let T :R 3 ->R 3 be the linear operator
defined by the formula
T (x1,x2,x3)=(3x1+x2,-2x1-4x2+3x3,5x1+4 x2-2x3)

Solution:
3 1 0  4  2  3
 2  4 3    11 6 9 
[T ]=   ,then[T ]-1=  
 5 4  2  12 7 10 
Example 7(Cont.)
  x1    x1   4  2  3  x1 
   x 2   11 6 9   x 2 
T –1   x 2  =[T –1]
  x3 
 =     
   x3   12 7 10   x3 

 4 x1  2 x 2  3x3
  11x1 6 x 2 9 x3 
=  
 12 x1 7 x 2 10 x 3 

Expressing this result in horizontal notation yields


T –1(X1,X2,X3)=(4X1-2X2-3X3,-11X1+6X2+9X3,-12X1+7X2+10X3)
Theorem 8.3.3
 If T1:U->V and T2:V->W are one to one
linear transformation then:

(a)T2 0 T1 is one to one

(b) (T2 0 T1)-1 = T1-1 0 T2-1

You might also like