Philosophies of Quality Gurus 2019
Philosophies of Quality Gurus 2019
Philosophies of Quality Gurus 2019
By
Fatima Gull Muhammad
WEEK # 3
Week 3 Topics
• TQM Structure
– TQM network
– Quality Circles & QITs.
– Suggestion Schemes
– TQM & team work
– Cross functional teams
– Internal & External customer relationship
• Philosophies of Quality Gurus
– Dr. Deming, Juran and Philips Crosby.
– Evolution of Quality Thinking
Integration of
• Staff
Continual
Improvement
Quality of Quality of
• Leadership • Work
• Learnability, • Process
Show • Enterprise
consistency results
Baldrige criteria for performance excellence
framework
Quality Circle (1/2)
• A quality circle is a group of workers who do the same or similar work,
who meet regularly to identify, analyze and solve work-related problems.
• Normally small in size, the group is usually led by a supervisor or manager
and presents its solutions to management; where possible, workers
implement the solutions themselves in order to improve the performance
of the organization and motivate employees.
• Quality circles were at their most popular during the 1980s, but continue
to exist in the form of Kaizen groups and similar worker participation
schemes.
• Typical topics for the attention of quality circles are:
– improving occupational safety and health
– improving product design
– improvement in the workplace & manufacturing processes
Quality Circle (2/2)
• Quality circles are typically more formal groups. They meet regularly on
company time and are trained by competent persons (usually
designated as facilitators) who may be personnel and industrial
relations specialists trained in human factors and the basic skills of
problem identification, information gathering and analysis, basic
statistics, and solution generation.
• Quality circles are generally free to select any topic they wish (other
than those related to salary and terms and conditions of work, as there
are other channels through which these issues are usually considered).
8. Drive out fear, so that everyone may work effectively for the
company.
9. Break down barriers between departments.
10.Eliminate numerical goals, posters and slogans for the workforce
asking for new levels of productivity without providing methods.
11.Eliminate work standards that prescribe numerical quotas.
12.Remove barriers that stand between the hourly worker and his
right to pride of workmanship.
13.Institute a vigorous programme of education and retraining.
14.Create a structure in top management that will push every day on
the above thirteen points.
W E Deming – PDCA Cycle
PDCA
PDSA cycle- seven steps or phases
Analyze the Develop the
Identify the
current optimal
opportunity
process solution(s)
Phase 7 Phase 2
Plan for the future Analyze the process
Act Plan
Study Do
Phase 6
Standardize the solution Phase 3
Develop the optimal solution(s)
Phae 55 Study
Phase the
Study the Phase4 Implementation
Phase
results
results 4 Implementation
Joseph Juran
• Structure CWQM concept: Company-Wide Quality Management
Quality
Quality
Inaccurate Problem
Problem
temperature
control Defective from vendor Poor process design
Ineffective quality
Not to specifications management
Dust and Dirt Material- Deficiencies
handling problems in product design
Environment
Environment Materials
Materials Process
Process
Ishikawa Diagram
• Diagrams which show the causes of a certain event
8 Ps (Services) 4 Ss
• Three sets of causes 1. Price (Services)
• The common number of employees for a quality circle group is about 8-10
individuals.
PRESENTATI TRAINING
ON Group processes
Implementation Data collection
Monitoring Problem analysis
Quality Circles
PROBLEM
SOLUTION IDENTIFICATION
Problem List alternatives
results Consensus
Brainstorming
PROBLEM
ANALYSIS
Cause and effect
Data collection and
analysis
Taguchi
– Developed concept of the ‘Loss Function’
– A quality product is a product that causes a minimal loss
(expressed in money!) to society during it's entire life.
The relation between this loss and the technical
characteristics is expressed by the loss function
– Deviation from target value causes losses
» Internal - increased cost of manufacture, increased cost of supply
» External - Customer dissatisfaction, warranty costs, loss of
reputation & ultimately loss of market
– Taguchi implies that Design has a vital Quality function
• His methodologies held ensure customer satisfaction
Walter A Shewhart
• Pioneer of modern quality control
• “founder of the control chart” (e.g. X-bar and R chart).
• originator of the plan-do-check-act cycle.
• perhaps the first to successfully integrate statistics,
engineering, and economics.
• defined quality in terms of objective and subjective quality
– objective quality: quality of a thing independent of
people.
– subjective quality: quality is relative to how people
perceive it. (value)
Feigenbaum
• Build it in at an earlier stage of the process.
• Armand Feigenbaum, like Deming and Juran, Achieved
visibility through his work with the Japanese.
• Unlike the latter two, he used a total quality control approach
that may very well be the forerunner of today’s TQM.
• He promoted a system for integrating efforts to develop,
maintain, and improve quality by various groups in an
organization.
• To do otherwise, according to Feigenbaum, would be to
inspect for and control quality after the fact rather than
Imai
• Known for the development of ‘Kaizen
philosophy (1986)
• Juran:
– Quality does not happen by accident, it must be planned,
– and quality planning is part of the trilogy of planning, control
and improvement.
– There is no shortcuts to quality
Review of Main Ideas of the Quality Guru
• Philip Crosby
– ‘DO it right first time’ and ‘Zero defects’.
– He based his quality improvement approach on four absolutes of quality
management, the cost of quality and quality improvement process.
• Kaoru Ishikawa’s
i. 7 tools of Quality Control
ii. Company Wide Quality Control (CWQC)
iii. Quality Circle Movement
• Shiegeo Shingo
– Poka-Yoke system to ensure ‘zero-defects’ in production by preventive
measures.
Review of Main Ideas of the Quality Guru
• Yoshio Kondo:
– identifies that quality is more compatible with human
nature than cost and productivity.
– He developed a four point approach to motivation which
makes it possible for work to be reborn as a creative
activity.
• Taiichi Ohno:
– JIT (Just-in-time)
– Lean Manufacturing
– Seven form of WASTE (MUDA)
Key Contributors to Quality Management
Contributor Known for
Deming 14 points; special & common causes of
variation