Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
72 views

Advance Structural Dynamics: Homework

This homework document describes dynamic analysis of a 2D frame structure performed by a group of 3 students. Modal analysis was conducted using SAP2000, ETABS, and MATLAB. Results from the different programs showed periods of vibration ranging from 0.5076 to 0.878 seconds. Equations of motion were developed and free, forced, and damped vibration responses were analyzed for the structure. Time histories, displacement ductility plots, and conclusions were presented.

Uploaded by

Alin Negară
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
72 views

Advance Structural Dynamics: Homework

This homework document describes dynamic analysis of a 2D frame structure performed by a group of 3 students. Modal analysis was conducted using SAP2000, ETABS, and MATLAB. Results from the different programs showed periods of vibration ranging from 0.5076 to 0.878 seconds. Equations of motion were developed and free, forced, and damped vibration responses were analyzed for the structure. Time histories, displacement ductility plots, and conclusions were presented.

Uploaded by

Alin Negară
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

ADVANCE STRUCTURAL

DYNAMICS

Homework
M1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Teacher: Prof Octavian-Victor Roșca

JUNE 2020
2 GROUP MEMBERS

 CONSTATIN POPA constantin.popa@student.tuiasi.ro

 ZAKARIA OWUSU-YEBOAH zakaria.owusu-yeboah@student.tuiasi.ro

 ZARINA KULBAYEVA zarina.kulbayeva@student.tuiasi.ro


3 INPUT DATA
 A 2D frame with 2 spans of 4 m and the height of 5 m
 The elements have constant cross-section of 0.4x0.4 m
 The material has the following characteristics:
Modulus of Elasticity: E = 2100000 kN/m²
Poisson’s Ratio:  = 0.3
 The critical damping ratio is considered ζ=0.05
 The lumped mass of the structure is m=200 tones.
4 2D FRAME
5 Description of Work done
 This 2D Frame (MDOF) problem was solved using analysis from
SAP2000 and ETABS. A MATLAB program was also used to
analysis the frame.
 The results have been indicated the slides following.
6 MODAL ANALYSIS USING SAP2000

T = 0.5076 Hz

f =1.97 sec
7 MODAL ANALYSIS USING ETABS
8 MODAL ANALYSIS USING ETABS (Cont)

 T = 0.878 sec
 f = 1.29 Hz
 ω = 7.068 rad/sec
9 Modal Analysis Results
- Displacements
- Accelerations
10 EQUATIONS OF MOTION
  

Initial conditions


11 EQUATIONS OF MOTION (Cont)
  The frame has the following dynamic characteristics:
T= 0.878 sec
f= 1.29 Hz
ω= 7.0675 rad/sec

 The form of the matrix A and B become:


12 Free Damped Vibrations Response of SDOF
Model with Initial Conditions
  Observe that the amplitude reduces exponentially with respect to time;
 Amplitude = 
 The natural logarithm (logarithm to the base e) of the ratio of amplitudes of two successive
cycles is constant which is known as logarithmic decrement;
13 Harmonic Underdamped Vibrations
Response of SDOFM
 Force input function of the harmonic excitation is the harmonic function, i.e. functions of
sines and cosines.
 This type of excitation is common to many system involving rotating and reciprocating
motion. Moreover, many other forces can be represented as an infinite series of harmonic
functions.
 By the principle of superposition, the response is the sum of the individual harmonic
response.
14 Harmonic Underdamped Vibrations
Response of SDOFM
15 Harmonic Overdamped Vibrations
Response of SDOFM
 Undamped system oscillates at a constant amplitude as predicted by the theory but the
response is not harmonic because of the superposition of initial condition response (0
phase lag)

 Damped system behavior is similar to the undamped system except that the initial
condition response decays in time so that the system finally oscillates at the steady-state
response as predicted by theory (approximately 0 phase lag)
16 Harmonic Overdamped Vibrations
Response of SDOFM
17 Vibrations Response of SDOFM for a
Periodical Excitation
18 Impulse Response of SDOFM
19 Correct and Engineering Display of Magnitude
and Phase - Bode Plot of a SDOF Model
20 Response of a SDOFM to a Transient Input
as a Rectangular Impulse
21 MATLAB Output from another Programming
22 NONLIN Application Results
23 Results from NONLIN
24 Computed Time Histories
25 Displacement Ductility Plots
26 Summary of Computed Results
27 CONCLUSION

 The free vibration response in terms of displacements and velocities for the DDOFs 1 and
2 have been shown in the above graphs and results. This shows the stick model with
Rayleigh type proportional damping.
 Also the results from the different software applications showed different results for the
period of vibrations, the frequencies and the displacements.

You might also like