Monopoly: Conomics
Monopoly: Conomics
Monopoly: Conomics
E R 1
5
Monopoly
Economics
P R IN C I P L E S O
F
N. Gregory
Mankiw
Premium PowerPoint Slides
by Ron Cronovich
© 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning,
In this chapter,
look for the answers to these questions:
2
Introduction
A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller of a
product without close substitutes.
In this chapter, we study monopoly and contrast
it with perfect competition.
The key difference:
A monopoly firm has market power, the ability to
influence the market price of the product it sells.
A competitive firm has no market power.
MONOPOLY 3
Why Monopolies Arise
The main cause of monopolies is barriers
to entry – other firms cannot enter the market.
Three sources of barriers to entry:
1. A single firm owns a key resource.
E.g., DeBeers owns most of the world’s
diamond mines
2. The govt gives a single firm the exclusive right
to produce the good.
E.g., patents, copyright laws
MONOPOLY 4
Why Monopolies Arise
3. Natural monopoly: a single firm can produce
the entire market Q at lower cost than could
several firms.
Example: 1000 homes
need electricity Cost Electricity
ATC slopes
ATC is lower if downward due
one firm services to huge FC and
all 1000 homes $80 small MC
than if two firms $50 ATC
each service
500 homes. Q
500 1000
MONOPOLY 5
Monopoly vs. Competition: Demand
Curves
In a competitive market,
the market demand curve
slopes downward.
A
But the demand curve
P c demand curve
for any individual firm’s o
product is horizontal m
p
at the market price. e
t
The firm can i D
t
increase Q i
without lowering P, v
e
so MR = P for Q
f
the competitive i
firm.
MONOPOLY r 6
Monopoly vs. Competition: Demand
Curves
A monopolist is the only
seller, so it faces the
market demand curve.
A monopolist’s
To sell a larger Q, demand
P
the firm must reduce P. curve
Thus, MR ≠ P.
D
Q
MONOPOLY 7
A C TI V E L E A R NI N G 1
A monopoly’s revenue
Common Grounds
Q P TR AR
is the only seller
MR
of 0
cappuccinos in $4.50 n.a.
town. 1
The table shows the 4.00
market demand for 2
cappuccinos. 3.50
Fill in the missing 3
spaces of the table. 3.00
What is the relation 4
between P and AR? 2.50 8
A C TI V E L E A R NI N G 1
Answers
Q P TR AR MR
Here, P = AR,
same as for 0 $4.50 $0 n.a.
a $4
1 4.00 4 $4.00
competitive 3
firm. 2 3.50 7 3.50
2
Here, MR < P, 3 3.00 9 3.00
whereas MR = P 1
4 2.50 10 2.50
for a 0
competitive 5 2.00 10 2.00
–1
firm. 6 1.50 9 1.50
9
Common Grounds’ D and MR Curves
P, MR
Q P MR $5
MONOPOLY 12
Profit-Maximization
Costs and
1. The profit- MC
maximizing Q Revenue
is where P
MR = MC.
2. Find P from
D
the demand
curve at this Q. MR
Q Quantity
Profit-maximizing output
MONOPOLY 13
The Monopolist’s Profit
Costs and
MC
Revenue
As with a P
ATC
competitive firm,
the monopolist’s ATC
profit equals D
(P – ATC) x Q MR
Q Quantity
MONOPOLY 14
A Monopoly Does Not Have an S Curve
A competitive firm
takes P as given
has a supply curve that shows how its Q depends
on P.
A monopoly firm
is a “price-maker,” not a “price-taker”
Q does not depend on P;
rather, Q and P are jointly determined by
MC, MR, and the demand curve.
MONOPOLY 15
CASE STUDY: Monopoly vs. Generic Drugs
QM Quantity
QC
MONOPOLY 16
The Welfare Cost of Monopoly
Recall: In a competitive market equilibrium,
P = MC and total surplus is maximized.
In the monopoly eq’m, P > MR = MC
The value to buyers of an additional unit (P)
exceeds the cost of the resources needed to
produce that unit (MC).
The monopoly Q is too low –
could increase total surplus with a larger Q.
Thus, monopoly results in a deadweight
loss.
MONOPOLY 17
The Welfare Cost of Monopoly
Competitive eq’m:
Price Deadweight
quantity = QC MC
P = MC loss
P
total surplus is P=
maximized MC
Monopoly M
D
eq’m: C
quantity = QM MR
P > MC QM QC Quantity
deadweight
loss
MONOPOLY 18
Price Discrimination
Discrimination:treating people differently
based on some characteristic, e.g. race or
gender.
Price discrimination: selling the same
good at different prices to different buyers.
The characteristic used in price discrimination
is willingness to pay (WTP):
A firm can increase profit by charging a
higher price to buyers with higher WTP.
MONOPOLY 19
Perfect Price Discrimination vs.
Single Price Monopoly
Here, the monopolist Consumer
Price
charges the same surplus
price (PM) to all D
buyers. PM e
a
loss
A deadweight loss d
results. MC
Monopoly w
profit ei D
gMR
ht
QM Quantity
MONOPOLY 20
Perfect Price Discrimination vs.
Single Price Monopoly
Here, the monopolist
produces the Price
Monopoly
competitive quantity,
profit
but charges each
buyer his or her WTP.
This is called perfect
MC
price discrimination.
D
The monopolist
captures all MR
CS as profit.
Quantity
But there’s no Q
DWL.
MONOPOLY 21
Price Discrimination in the Real World
In the real world, perfect price discrimination is
not possible:
No firm knows every buyer’s WTP
Buyers do not announce it to sellers
So, firms divide customers into groups
based on some observable trait
that is likely related to WTP, such as
age.
MONOPOLY 22
Examples of Price Discrimination
Movie tickets
Discounts for seniors, students, and people
who can attend during weekday afternoons.
They are all more likely to have lower WTP
than people who pay full price on Friday night.
Airline prices
Discounts for Saturday-night stayovers help
distinguish business travelers, who usually have
higher WTP, from more price-sensitive leisure
travelers.
MONOPOLY 23
Examples of Price Discrimination
Discount coupons
People who have time to clip and organize
coupons are more likely to have lower income
and lower WTP than others.
Need-based financial aid
Low income families have lower WTP for
their children’s college education.
Schools price-discriminate by offering
need-based aid to low income families.
MONOPOLY 24
Examples of Price Discrimination
Quantity discounts
A buyer’s WTP often declines with additional
units, so firms charge less per unit for large
quantities than small ones.
Example: A movie theater charges $4 for
a small popcorn and $5 for a large one that’s
twice as big.
MONOPOLY 25
Public Policy Toward Monopolies
Increasing competition with antitrust laws
Ban some anticompetitive practices,
allow govt to break up monopolies.
E.g., Sherman Antitrust Act (1890),
Clayton Act (1914)
Regulation
Govt agencies set the monopolist’s
price.
For natural monopolies, MC < ATC
at all Q,
so marginal cost pricing would
result in losses.
MONOPOLY 26
Public Policy Toward Monopolies
Public ownership
Example: U.S. Postal Service
Problem: Public ownership is usually less
efficient since no profit motive to minimize costs
Doing nothing
The foregoing policies all have drawbacks,
so the best policy may be no policy.
MONOPOLY 27
CONCLUSION: The Prevalence of Monopoly
MONOPOLY 28
CHAPTER SUMMARY
29
CHAPTER SUMMARY
30
CHAPTER SUMMARY
31