Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Introduction To Business Law: Type Author Names Here Lucy Jones

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Lucy

Type Jones
author names here

Introduction to Business Law

Chapter 5

© Oxford University Press, 2015. All rights reserved.


Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Intention to Create Legal Relations

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Simpkins v Pays (1955)

• Mrs Pays, her granddaughter and lodger


enter into a competition each week.
• They agree to share any prizes.
• Entries are sent in Mrs P’s name.
• One week they win £750. But Mrs P refuses
to share money with lodger.
Decision: From facts there was an intention to
enter into legal relations - lodger entitled to
1/3rd of winnings.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Commercial/Business Agreements

Presumed parties intend agreement to be


legally binding unless:
• Agreement states it is not binding or
• Party seeking to have agreement set aside
can show that at the time the agreement was
made there was no intention that it should be
legally enforceable.

If the commercial/business agreement is ambiguous


an intention to create legal relations will be
presumed. Edwards v Skyways (1964).

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Contractual Capacity

• Capacity to enter into contracts may be


limited where one of the parties is:
• A minor
• Intoxicated
• Mentally impaired
• A corporation acting outside its powers.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Contractual Capacity: Minors

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Consideration

• In order for a contract to be legally


enforceable there must be an exchange of
consideration (the law does not enforce
gratuitous promises unless made under
deed).
• The consideration provided by each party
must have some value but need not be of
adequate value i.e. the law is not concerned if
one party makes a poor bargain.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Value of Consideration

Even items which Chappell v Nestle (1966)


are disposed of by Chocolate wrappers
one parties as sent to Nestle could
having no value amount to part of the
may represent consideration for a
valuable legal record, as Nestle
consideration. benefitted the sales of
chocolate which may
not otherwise have
been sold.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Past consideration
Re McArdle (1951)
• Consideration • Mr. M died and left his house
given before a to Mrs M and then to their
contract is children in equal shares.
completed (past • Daughter-in-law, (D) made
consideration) is house improvements costing
not adequate for £488.
a binding • After improvements made all
contract. children signed agreement
that they would reimbursed D
when Mrs M died.
• Decision: Agreement was
after work done and was not
legally enforceable D could
not claim reimbursement.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Consideration must be sufficient

• Performance of a public duty:


• A party to a contract cannot use what they are
required to do as a public duty as
consideration in a contract, Collins v
Godefroy (1831).
• But if they do more than their public duty that
can amount to good consideration, Glasbrook
Bros v Glamorgan CC (1925).

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Contractual Duties in existing contracts:
Williams v Roffey Bros (1990)

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Privity of Contract

Jones: Introduction to Business Law


Contracts (Rights Of Third Parties)
Act 1999
• Persons who are not party to a contract can
sue for their rights under the contract:
 where the contract expressly permits enforcement
by third parties or
 where the purpose of the contract is to benefit the
third party (unless clear that the contract did not
intend to create rights for third parties).
• A person need not be in existence at time
contract was made to gain rights under it.

Jones: Introduction to Business Law

You might also like