This document provides an overview of key concepts in business law related to contractual agreements, including: intention to create legal relations; contractual capacity; consideration; and privity of contract. It examines relevant cases that helped establish principles for what makes an agreement legally binding and how third parties' rights and past consideration affect enforceability. The document aims to introduce foundational elements of how the law approaches formation and obligations within business contracts.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in business law related to contractual agreements, including: intention to create legal relations; contractual capacity; consideration; and privity of contract. It examines relevant cases that helped establish principles for what makes an agreement legally binding and how third parties' rights and past consideration affect enforceability. The document aims to introduce foundational elements of how the law approaches formation and obligations within business contracts.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in business law related to contractual agreements, including: intention to create legal relations; contractual capacity; consideration; and privity of contract. It examines relevant cases that helped establish principles for what makes an agreement legally binding and how third parties' rights and past consideration affect enforceability. The document aims to introduce foundational elements of how the law approaches formation and obligations within business contracts.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in business law related to contractual agreements, including: intention to create legal relations; contractual capacity; consideration; and privity of contract. It examines relevant cases that helped establish principles for what makes an agreement legally binding and how third parties' rights and past consideration affect enforceability. The document aims to introduce foundational elements of how the law approaches formation and obligations within business contracts.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law Intention to Create Legal Relations
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Simpkins v Pays (1955)
• Mrs Pays, her granddaughter and lodger
enter into a competition each week. • They agree to share any prizes. • Entries are sent in Mrs P’s name. • One week they win £750. But Mrs P refuses to share money with lodger. Decision: From facts there was an intention to enter into legal relations - lodger entitled to 1/3rd of winnings.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Commercial/Business Agreements
Presumed parties intend agreement to be
legally binding unless: • Agreement states it is not binding or • Party seeking to have agreement set aside can show that at the time the agreement was made there was no intention that it should be legally enforceable.
If the commercial/business agreement is ambiguous
an intention to create legal relations will be presumed. Edwards v Skyways (1964).
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Contractual Capacity
• Capacity to enter into contracts may be
limited where one of the parties is: • A minor • Intoxicated • Mentally impaired • A corporation acting outside its powers.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Contractual Capacity: Minors
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Consideration
• In order for a contract to be legally
enforceable there must be an exchange of consideration (the law does not enforce gratuitous promises unless made under deed). • The consideration provided by each party must have some value but need not be of adequate value i.e. the law is not concerned if one party makes a poor bargain.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Value of Consideration
Even items which Chappell v Nestle (1966)
are disposed of by Chocolate wrappers one parties as sent to Nestle could having no value amount to part of the may represent consideration for a valuable legal record, as Nestle consideration. benefitted the sales of chocolate which may not otherwise have been sold.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Past consideration Re McArdle (1951) • Consideration • Mr. M died and left his house given before a to Mrs M and then to their contract is children in equal shares. completed (past • Daughter-in-law, (D) made consideration) is house improvements costing not adequate for £488. a binding • After improvements made all contract. children signed agreement that they would reimbursed D when Mrs M died. • Decision: Agreement was after work done and was not legally enforceable D could not claim reimbursement.
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Consideration must be sufficient
• Performance of a public duty:
• A party to a contract cannot use what they are required to do as a public duty as consideration in a contract, Collins v Godefroy (1831). • But if they do more than their public duty that can amount to good consideration, Glasbrook Bros v Glamorgan CC (1925).
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Contractual Duties in existing contracts: Williams v Roffey Bros (1990)
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Privity of Contract
Jones: Introduction to Business Law
Contracts (Rights Of Third Parties) Act 1999 • Persons who are not party to a contract can sue for their rights under the contract: where the contract expressly permits enforcement by third parties or where the purpose of the contract is to benefit the third party (unless clear that the contract did not intend to create rights for third parties). • A person need not be in existence at time contract was made to gain rights under it.