Quiz:: Match The Description/ Concepts in Column A With The Philosophers/ Theorists in Column B
Quiz:: Match The Description/ Concepts in Column A With The Philosophers/ Theorists in Column B
Quiz:: Match The Description/ Concepts in Column A With The Philosophers/ Theorists in Column B
Sociologist George Simmel stated that you join these groups because
your family is also a part of it, in the first place. He called it organic
motivation. Simmel noted that the positive effect of organic groups is
rootedness. This means the foundation of the social network runs deep,
thus, giving the person a sense of belongingness. The downside, however,
is that organic group imply less freedom and greater social conformity.
You are expected to act and behave according to your community’s
standards (Allan, 2012).
SOCIAL GROUPS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS
Rational Group- occur in modern societies. Modern societies are made
up of different people coming from different places. The family in modern
societies is not the main motivation when joining rational social groups.
Rational groups are formed as a matter of shared self-interest, moreover,
people join these group out of their own free will. Simmel called this
rational motivation. Rational groups imply greater freedom, especially the
freedom of movement.
Language
According to Mead, self-development and
intimately tied. Through shared understanding of
symbols, gestures, and sound, language gives the
individual the capacity to express himself or herself
while at the same time comprehending what other
people are conveying.
Language sets the stage for self-development.
MEAD AND THE SOCIAL SELF
Play
The second stage for self-development is play. At
this level, individuals role-play or assume the
perspectives of others. Role-playing enables the person
to internalize some other people’s perspectives; hence,
he or she develops an understanding of how the other
people feel about themselves (and about others, too) in
a variety of situations.
MEAD AND THE SOCIAL SELF
Game
This stage is the level where the individual not
only internalizes the other people’s perspectives, he or
she is also abele to take into account societal rules and
adheres to it. According to Mead, the self is developed
by understanding the rule, and one must abide by it to
win the game or be successful at an activity.
TWO SIDES OF SELF: “I” AND “ME”
Mead sees the person as an active process, not just a mere
reflection of society. He further proposed two interactive
facets of the self: the “I” and the “me”.
The “me” and the “I” have a didactic relationship, which is
like a system of checks and balances.
According to Mead, “me” is the product of what the person
has learned while interacting with others and with the
environment. Learned behaviors, attitudes, and even
expectations comprise the “me”. The “me” exercises social
control over the self. It sees to it that the rules are not
broken.
TWO SIDES OF SELF: “I” AND “ME”
The “I” is part of the self that is unsocialized and
spontaneous. It is the individual’s response to the
community’s attitude toward the person.
The “I” presents impulses and drives. It enables him or her
to express individualism and creativity.
The “I” does not blindly follow rules. It understands when
to possibly bend or stretch the rules that govern the social
interactions. It constructs a response based on what has
been learned by the “me”.