Nature and Functions of Quasi-Judicial Bodies: Competition Commission of India and Its Constitutional Conflicts
Nature and Functions of Quasi-Judicial Bodies: Competition Commission of India and Its Constitutional Conflicts
Nature and Functions of Quasi-Judicial Bodies: Competition Commission of India and Its Constitutional Conflicts
JUDICIAL BODIES
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND
ITS CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS
Shaurya Aron
16132
Introduction
◦ Introduction of Articles 323A and 323B through the 42nd Amendment
◦ Case against CCI and COMPAT and the Delhi High court Judgement
◦ Characteristics:
◦ 1) creation of Statute
2
Bharat Bank Ltd. V. employees
Constitutionality of CCI and COMPAT
◦ Constitutionality challenged vide cases
◦ 1) Shamsher Kataria, In re, 2014
◦ 2) Mahindra and Mahindra v CCI, Del HC (2014)
◦ The provision of casting vote or second vote is also antithetical to the judicial process and suffers from
1
the vice of arbitrariness and unreasonableness
◦ Therefore, §22(3) that vests the Chairperson or member presiding with such an extraneous power, is
liable to be struck down as unconstitutional.
◦ Nature and Functions
◦ Declare any agreement between two parties as void (u/s 3 of the act)
◦ vested with powers to direct that the agreement shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner that may be
prescribed 2
1
Shobhana Shankar Patil v. Ramchandra Shirodkar, 1996 SCC OnLine Bom 55
2
The Competition Act, 2002, §19.
Conclusion
◦ Brought into effect by the parliament to ensure free and fair competition in the economy
◦ A strong case can be established that the executive attempted to secure the composition and functioning
of the tribunal
Not only has the composition and manner of appointments directly infringed upon judicial
independence, they have also had a bearing on the effective functioning of the two bodies, which