BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS

MALFORAMTION

cka

DR. SURESH BISHOKARMA

MS, MCH (Neurosurgery)
Department of
Neurosurgery, Upendra
Devkota Memorial National
Institute of
Neurological and Allied Sciences
 APPROACH TO VASCULAR LESION

Suspected vascular
lesion

Abnormal vessels in No abnormal vessels

parenchyma in parenchyma

Compact nidus Diffuse nidus Enlarged pial arteries No enlarged pial Fine networks
appearance appearance arteries

Single Multiple Early draining No early draining Caput medusae Pial AVFs DAVFs Moyamoya
appearance

Brain AVM, Pial Proliferative type Proliferative DVA

CAMS
AVM brain AVMs angiopathy CM, VA

CAMS: Cerebrofacial arteriovenous metameric

syndrome
DVA: Developmental Venous Anomalies
CM: Cavernous malformation
 DYSPLASTIC VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS

1. Venous anomalies
2. Capillary telangiectasias
3. Cavernous malformations
4. AVM

 AVM: Unique from other in there is presence of an arteriovenous shunt, which is defined
as oxygenated blood passing directly into the venous system without gas exchange
occurring in a capillary bed.
 These shunts are characterized by high flow and high pressure, which distinguish them
from other vascular malformations.
 HISTORY OF AVM
SURGERY
 AVMs were initially described in the mid- 1800s by Luschka1 (in 1854) and Virchow2 (in
1863). Three decades later, Giordano performed the first surgical exposure of an AVM in
1889.3 In the same year, Péan performed the first successful extirpation of an AVM.3
Multiple neurosurgeons attempted to treat AVMs in the early 20th century. Krause, for
example, was the first to attempt a surgical elimination of an AVM by ligating its arterial
feeders, without great success, however.4 Multiple techniques that were considered
innovations at a certain point in the 20th century might look bizarre to the contemporary
neurosurgeon. In 1951, Bilsland5 published a report in which he reviewed the use of
preoperative exsanguination to decrease bleeding during intracranial surgery; of particular
interest were AVMs because it was thought that exsanguination might help control
intraoperative bleeding. In 1954, Brown6 supported this technique by illustrating a series
of 133 patients. He stated that “[exsanguination] can be readily controlled more so than
when specific vasodilator drugs are used to reduce bleeding.
 DEFINITION

 Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are dynamic, high pressure flow, dysplastic
vascular lesion characterized by abnormal connections between arteries and veins leading
to arteriovenous shunting with no capillary bed and intervening neural parenchyma in an
intervening network of vessels—the so- called nidus.
 These usually are congenital lesions with a lifelong risk of bleeding of ≈ 2–4% per year.
 Small AVMs are now thought to have much higher pressure in the feeding arteries: so
small AVMs are more lethal than larger ones and bleeds more frequent.
 S-m grade 1–3: annual risk of hemorrhage is 3.5%. S-m grade 4–5: annual risk of
hemorrhage is 2.5%.
 The hemorrhage risk (but not the rate) may be higher in pediatrics or with posterior-fossa
AVMs.
 AVM mimics

 Unlike aneurysms, they are not thought to develop de novo, yet the vast majority of them
remains clinically silent for decades.
 Unlike a neoplasm, it can grow along with the brain without necessarily displacing
functional structures.
 Therefore, many never cause functional neurological compromise regardless of size
 Types of
AVM
 AVMs may be plexiform, fistulous, or both.

 A fistulous malformation may be an otherwise normal artery directly joining a vein.

 A plexiform malformation is defined as an artery connecting to a network of poorly
differentiated, immature vessels before (nidus) passing into a vein.
 ADJECTIVE FOR
AVM
 True, cerebral, pial, parenchymal, cisternal, ventricular, medullary
 MORPHOLOGY OF
AVM
 Nidus
 Feeders
 Venous
drainage
 NIDUS

 Size
 Location: proximity to eloquent structure
 Shape: Radiological or surgical planning.
 FEEDERS
 Number, size, Origin from part of COW, relative contribution to the nidus, location,
association (Aneurysm)
 ICA or ECA origin.
 Supply from pial collaterals.
 Watershed AVM may have ACA and PCA
 Erratic feeders.
 Types of arterial feeders.
1. Direct feeders are the simplest to conceptualize: they end directly and exclusively
in the nidus, and they are also known as terminal feeders.
2. Transit arteries or artery en passage are normal arteries that appear on
angiogram
to pass near or even through the nidus while going on to supply normal tissue.
3. The third type of feeding artery is the indirect feeder. This artery combines
the previous two in that as it passes near the nidus it can contribute to the
shunt before continuing on to supply normal brain.
 AVMs within the sylvian fissure usually harbor many en passage contributions from the
distal middle cerebral arteries.
 VENOUS DRAINAGE

 Number, size, and locations

 Tortuous course, ectasias, stenosis.
 Arterialization
 Draining into superficially via the cortical surface or deeply to the vein of Galen.
 Like transit arteries: normal veins may be draining functional cerebral tissue that may be
adjacent to the lesion.
 Vasculature of
AVM
 The arterial feeder vessels and venous drainage of a brain AVM will depend on the
location of the nidus.
 Deep and ventricular locations will recruit perforator (lentriculostriate, thalamoperforator
branches) and choroidal (anterior, medial, and lateral posterior choroidal arteries) supply,
respectively, whereas venous drainage will typically be via the deep venous system.
 In more superficial or cortical locations, the main arterial supplies are through the pial
arteries (branches of the anterior cerebral artery, MCA, and PCA), whereas venous
drainage is mainly through the cortical veins.
 The absence of cortical venous drainage in a superficially located brain AVM may
indicate thrombosis of the superficial outlets with subsequent rerouting into the deep
system, which would suggest a more unstable lesion.
 Recruitment of the transdural supply is sometimes seen in large lesions.
 SUB-TYPES OF LOBAR AVM

AVM Subtype Subtype Feeders Venous drain

1 Lateral frontal, MCA branches that originate from the superior SSS
trunk. Sylvian v

Frontal AVM 2 Medial frontal ACA Medial frontal veinSSS

5 Subtypes
3 Paramedian frontal Watershed: MCA, ACA lateral and medial frontal veins 
SSS
4 Basal frontal Watershed: MCA, ACA SSS via an anterior OrbFrV or
FrPolV
5 Sylvian frontal M3 SupSylV, DeepSylV

1 Lateral Temporal AVM ATA and MidTempA feeding anterior AntTempV, MidTempV, and
temporal AVMs and PosTempA and PosTempV to the vein of Labbe
TempOccA feeding posterior temporal AVMs and the TrvS
Temporal AVM
4 Subtypes 2 Sylvian temporal M3 opercular empSylV, SupSylV, and
DeepSylV.

3 Basal temporal PCA >MCA TempBasV

4 Medial temporal. AChA and the P2 PCA BVR

1 Lateral parieto- occipital, MCA cortical arteries: CenA, AntParA, SSS

PosParA, AngA, and TempOccA. Sylvian v

Parieto-Occipital AVM
4 subtypes 2 Medial parieto-occipital PCA>ACA SSS, VOG

3 Paramedian parieto- occipital MCA, PCA, ACA SSS

4 Basal occipital TempA and inferior branches from CalcA. TrvS or TentS

Michael T Lawton: Seven AVM: Tenets and Techniques for resection.

 Deep AVM and subtypes

Subtype Subtype Feeders Venous drain

1 Pure sylvian M2, M3 SupSylV > DeepSylV

2 Insular M2 Sylvian V.
3 Basal ganglia InsP and lLSA DeepSlyV (lateral variant) or CauV
and ThaStrV (medial variant)
4 Thalamic avms Below: AntThaP (PCoA) and
ICV PosThaP (P1 PCA), and from
above by lPChA and mPChA

Michael T Lawton: Seven AVM: Tenets and Techniques for

 SUBTYPES OF CEREBELLAR AVM

Subtype Subtype Feeders Venous drain

1 Suboccipital cerebellar AVM SCA, AICA, and PICA IHemV and/or IVerV TrVs.

2 Tentorial Cerebellar AVM SCA SHemV that can bridge anteriorly to the
VoG, posteriorly to Torc, or superiorly to
TentS or StrS
3 Vermian Cerebellar AVM Superior: SCA SuperiorSVerV and VoG, inferior
Inferior: PICA IVerV and Torc.

4 Tonsillar Cerebellar AVM PICA Medial and lateral TonsV as well as

ReTonsV.
5 Petrosal Cerebellar AVM AICA AHemV and VCPonF, which then course to
SPetrV and SPS.

Michael T Lawton: Seven AVM: Tenets and Techniques for

 Angiogram

 Rotational angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction has now replaced the old-
fashioned stereoangiography, which previously provided excellent tracking of the course
of feeding arteries and draining veins.
 Superselective angiography of a suspected vessel can show if it contributes to the nidus or
not and help distinguish a transit artery.
 However, superselective catheterization of an artery en passage can have variable
presentation on angiography depending on the hemodynamics of the vessel.
 AVM feeders is that they do not seem to follow the traditional pattern of progressive
luminal narrowing as they flow distally.
 Arterial feeders can even exhibit pathological stenosis or even aneurysms.
 CTA

Tangle of serpigenous vascular structures are seen at the left frontal lobe, supplied by the
distal branches of the hypertrophied left anterior and middle cerebral arteries and drained by
enlarged cortical veins draining into the superior sagittal sinus, few enlarged veins are also
seen draining into the left transverse & sigmoid sinuses.
DSA
MRI
 MRI

1. Flow void on T1WIor T2WIwithin the AVM

2. Feeding arteries
3. Draining veins
4. Increased intensity on partial flip-angle (to differentiate signal dropout on T1WI or T2WI
from calcium)
5. Significant edema around the lesion may indicate a tumor that has bled rather than an
AVM
6. Gradient echo sequences (GRASS) help demonstrate surrounding hemosiderin which
suggests a previous significant hemorrhage
7. A complete ring of low density (due to hemosiderin) surrounding the lesion suggests
AVM over neoplasm
 CT SCAN

 Intracranial hemorrhage.
 Suspicion of an AVM.
 calcium deposition (25% to 30% )
 Iso- to hyperdense serpiginous vessels that might be located at some distance from the
hemorrhage.
 A CT angiogram (CTA) : delineate the nidus and associated vessels.
CT SCAN
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

 A weakness common to both CT and MR modalities is the lack of temporal sequencing of

images to determine the dynamic aspect of the malformation
 SPECIAL TEST

 Use of adjunctive diagnostic studies is helpful in selective cases.

 Functional MRI (fMRI) has helped assess the proximity of language and motor function
in relation to AVM but has limitations.
 Magnetic source imaging (MSI) can accurately localize sensory cortex and even visual
and motor areas and the information can be overlaid on the MRI.
 MR Tractography should aid in assessing the relationship of deep white matter tracts to
the AVM.
 The information derived from these studies is helpful in deciding the treatment and
possibly assessing the neurological risk before intervention.
 Intraoperative functional mapping has limited value because one cannot do partial
treatment in AVMs, in contrast to tumors.
 Angiotomography: Especially for spinal AVM
 PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 Defect in Vasculogenesis lead to dysplastic vessels in embryonic period.:

vasculogenesis process creates a haphazard network of immature cells that form
angiocysts, which eventually fuse to form a primitive capillary plexus.
 AVM is a congenital lesions: HPE reveals embryonic blood vessels.
 Genetic association: Osler-Weber-Rendu, Wyburg-Mason syndromes, Heriditary
Hemorrhagic Telengiactasis.
 Congenital theory: Stable vascular and capillary plexus: molecular basis
 Patho-anatomy in vascular bed

 Steal: surrounding normal brain tissue:

 Lower vascular resistance:
 Lower local arterial pressures.

 This association may be attributable to higher feeding pressures in smaller

AVMs.
 From this concept, two ideas have developed.
 Decrease vascular resistance from the arteriovenous shunt
 Dysautoregulation: lower perfusion pressures in adjacent tissue:
↑
NPPB.
 Arterialisation: tortuosity.
 Molecular biology

 VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor):

 ANGs (angiopoetins) regulate the recruitment of smooth muscle cells and pericytes to
endothelial cells are thought to promote vascular stabilization during angiogenesis.
 FGFs (fibroblast growth factors):
 It has been reported that some endothelial and angiogenic molecular factors
(angiopoetins), such as endoglin, Alk1, VEGF, SMAD1, and Notch signaling are related
to the bAVM formation.
Biological process suspected in formation
AVMand re-modelling

Characteristics VASCULOGENESIS ANGIOGENESIS ARTERIOGENESIS

Formation of endothelium Formation and stabilization Growth and formation of

Definition
from progenitor cells of capillary networks arterial collaterals

Preprogrammed molecular Shear stress on vascular

Stimulus Ischemia
factors endothelium
Post-vasculogenesis cell bed Sprouting from existing
Location Embryonic cell bed in embryo. Hypoxic cell bed
arteries
in adult
Role in brain
arteriovenous Later remodeling and Growth, remodeling, and
Dysplasia in initiation
malformation recurrence recurrence

Role in dural Ischemia or trauma may

Growth, remodeling, and
arteriovenous Unlikely (noncongenital) initiate dysplasia. Later
recurrence
fistulas remodeling and recurrence
 Genetics

 The congenital nature of the AVM implies that the surrounding normal brain tissue has
developed with relatively lower vascular resistance than what would have normally
occurred.

 As a result, the vascular beds of normal brain parenchyma surrounding the AVM are
perfused at lower local arterial pressures.
 This association may be attributable to higher feeding pressures in smaller AVMs.

 From this concept, two ideas have developed.

 Decrease vascular resistance from the arteriovenous shunt
 Dysautoregulation: lower perfusion pressures in adjacent tissue: ↑ NPPB.
 PATHOLOGICALSEQUELAE

1. Hemorrhage:
2. Seizure
3. Headache
4. Neurological deficit
 HEMORRHAGE
 Peak age for hemorrhage is between 15–20 yrs.
 Mortality: 10%, morbidity: 30–50%

Hemorrhage location with AVMs

1. Intraparenchymal (ICH): 82%
Note: ICH is usual presentation of deeper AVM.
2. Intraventricular hemorrhage:
a) usually accompanied by ICH as the result of rupture of the ICH into the ventricle
b) pure IVH (with no ICH) may indicate an intraventricular AVM
A small, deep AVM may hemorrhage exclusively intraparenchymally, but a cortical
AVM may have a subarachnoid blood component.
3. Subarachnoid: SAH may also be due to rupture of an aneurysm on a feeding artery; common
withAVMs
Note: SAH is usual presentation of superficial AVM or Intranidal aneurysm.
4. Subdural: uncommon. May be the source of a spontaneous SDH.
5. Small AVM associated with increased risk of bleed: High feeding pressure.
6. Spinal AVM: Excruciating low ow back pain with Headache and compressive myelopathy
 HEMORRHAGE RELATED TO SM GRADE

 S-M grade 1–3: annual risk of hemorrhage is 3.5%.

 S-M grade 4–5: annual risk of hemorrhage is 2.5%.

Jayaraman MV et al. Hemorrhage rate in patients with Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V AVM:
is
treatment justified? Stroke. 2007
RISK CALCULATION FOR HEMORRHAGE

 Annual and lifetime risk of hemorrhage and recurrent hemorrhage

The average risk of hemorrhage from an AVM is ≈ 2–4%per
year.

 Risk of bleeding at least once = 1- (annual risk of not bleeding) ^ expected years of
remaining life.

 Risk of bleeding at least once in 25 years = 1-0.97^25 = 0.53 = 53%

 The cumulative probability can also be simply approximated with the linear formula of p
= (105 − age)/100.

longevity is taken from insurance life-tables

Applying the law of multiplicative probability, one can construct a risk curve for hemorrhage based on
the expected years of life remaining using the various annual risks reported.
Spetzler RF, et al. Relationship of Perfusion Pressure and Size to Risk of Hemorrhage from AVM. J Neurosurg.
1992
 ANNUAL HEMORRHAGE RATES FOR
AVERAGE AVM SUBGROUPS
VARIOUS

Stapf C, et al. Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated bAVM. Neurology. 2006;
66:1350–
LIFE TIME RISK OF HEMORRHAGE
  The average interval between hemorrhages was noted to be 7 years.

Finnish study: 2008: Laakso A et al. Long-term excess mortality in 623 patients with brain arteriovenous
malformations.
Neurosurgery
Future hemorrhage when patients present
with ruptured bAVMs
(1) Associated aneurysms (maybe an effect, but the magnitude of this effect is not
quantifiable),
(2) Deep venous drainage (maybe an effect, but the magnitude of this effect is not
quantifiable),
(3) venous outflow stenosis (a reasonable hypothesis that patients with a progressive
restriction of venous outflow have an increased risk),
(4) Increasing age (may increase the risk, but perhaps not independent of the correlation
between age and aneurysms),
(5) Pregnancy (more likely than not that there is no or minimal impact of pregnancy),
(6) AVM size (unlikely to be of importance), and
(7) Female gender (unlikely to be of importance).

Morgan et al. Critical review of brain AVM surgery, surgical results and natural history. Acta Neurochir.
2017
 SEIZURE

 Approximately 15% to 30%

 epileptogenic AVMs :
 Cortical (temporal or parietal) location of the nidus or feeding artery, feeding by the
MCA/ECA, absence of aneurysms, presence of varices in the venous drainage,
 Pathogenesis: cortical irritation or remodeling from ischemia, altered hemodynamics,
mass effect, or micro hemorrhage.
 Rx: Medical: Refractory: Radiosurgery/surgery.
 USUAL
PRESENTATION
 A higher percentage of patients under the age of 20 and over the age of 60 present with
hemorrhage,
 while
 seizure presentation is more likely between the ages of 20 and 60 years.
 Headaches

 Headaches are the presenting symptom in approximately 15% of patients without

evidence of rupture.
 They can be characterized as similar to migraines with lateralization to one side, but they
may have a more permanent nature.
 AVMs may occasionally be associated with migraines. Occipital AVMs may present with
visual disturbance (typically hemianopsia or quadrantanopsia) and H/A that are
indistinguishable from migraine.
 NEUROLOGICAL DEFICIT

 Relatively rare.
 Spectrum of deficits varies with the morphological nature of the malformation.
 Transient, progressive, or permanent and the deficits can arise through a number of
mechanisms.
 Mass effect
 Arterial steal: Redirecting flow toward the shunt at a cost to normal vascular beds to
normal brain.
 Infact, steal is thought to be relatively rare because the surrounding tissue does
manage to adapt.
 Large AVMs: increased physiological evidence of steal.
 GRADING SYSTEM
THE SPETZLER-MARTIN
SYSTEM
CHARACTERISTICS POINTS

Medium 3-6cm 2

Location Non- eloquent site 0

Pattern of venous drainage Superficial only 0

* Sensorimotor, language, visual cortex, hypothalamus, thalamus, internal capsule,

brain stem, cerebellar peduncles, or cerebellar nuclei.
 FALLACIES OF SM GRADING

1. It lacks the ability to assess risks for interventions other than exclusive microneurosurgery
2. The studies were carried out by a highly experienced vascular team and may not
necessarily be applicable to a general neurosurgeon’s ability.
3. Deep perforator supply and nidus diffuseness parameters are not included.
4. Flow dynamics were not assessed
5. Posterior fossa AVM
6. Size measurement is taken as a linear parameter, which when taken in the context of
volume, has tremendous variation within the range of dimension.
Treatment with radiosurgery is volume dependent.
 As an example, the spherical volume of a 5.54-cm-diameter AVM is approximately
four times greater than an AVM measuring 3.5 cm, even though both of them are
assigned 2 points in the Spetzler-Martin scale.
 Lawton and young classification
SM Grading Points Supplementary Grading
Size Age
Small <3cm 1 <20
Medium 3-6cm 2 20-40
Large >6cm 3 >40
Venous Drainage Bleeding
Superficial only 0 Yes
Deep component 1 No
Eloquence Compactness
No 0 Yes
Yes 1 No
Total 5
SM-Supp point= 10

SM-Supplemantary grade of 6 is cut- off or boundary for AVM

operability
 MANAGEMENT

“Considerations to be taken into account”

1. Age
2. Previous hemorrhage
3. Morphology
4. Grade
5. Eloquency
6. Associated aneurysms
7. Flow: High or low
8. Availability of interventional neuro-radiologist.
9. General medical condition of the patient.
CONSIDERATION FOR DEFINITIVE TREATMENT

1. Medical or symptomatic management

2. Embolization
3. Microsurgery
4. Radiosurgery
5. Multimodality therapy
A MULTIDISCIPLINARY
APPROACH
 It is best to have a multidisciplinary team consisting of a vascular neurosurgeon,
neuroendovascular specialist, and radiation oncologist.

 Choice of therapy:
 Small AVM : Microsurgery is a choice: Role of embolisation is practically nil
 SM 2&3 : Radiosurgery
 SM 2&3 with;
 Size 3-6cm or 14cc volume : Radiosurgery
 Volume >14cc : Embolization SRS
 SM 4&5: NO SURGERY: SRS though inadequate: Volume * dose is complication.
 Dose staging: Small dose few year then high dose afterward
 Volume staging: Sequential irradiation of 15ml volume of target every 6months with
full dose.
 MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

 Medical management or nonintervention is indicated when the patient may have suffered
a devastating neurological deficit.
 The malformation may be very
extensive, located deep in the
brain, with blood supply
 primarily from deep perforating
vessels, which are not amenable
 Obviously poor ormedical
to endovascular condition, such as advanced heart disease, respiratory
radiosurgical
insufficiency,
treatment. or cancer with metastasis.
 Symptomatic
Very advancedtreatment
age refers to management of non-hemorrhagic sequelae such as AEDs
for seizure control.
 EMBOLISATION

 The advancement of applications in interventional neuroradiology has led to its

application in the treatment of
 AVMs.
Although the treatment of certain AVMs may be possible with interventional techniques
alone and the technologies are evolving, embolization is not yet considered an exclusive
 general treatment for most AVMs for two reasons.
 First, AVMs that are embolized have a rate of permanent morbidity between 4% and 14%.
Second, if the goal of AVM cure is considered to be complete obliteration of the nidus
with no remaining arteriovenous shunting, then current techniques are not yet at the point
where any vessel of any size and location can be safely embolized without risk of
 perforation or cerebral infarcts.
Additionally, attempting to arrest all arteriovenous shunting visualized on angiography
can result in eventual reconstitution of shunting by recanalization or de novo vascular
 development, depending on the embolized vessel’s reaction.
Early microsurgery following embolization must be institute before recanalization,
usually within a week.
 Goal of Embolization

 Pre surgical: To control the feeders.

 Pre SRS: To reduce the size of nidus amenable for radiation.
 EMBOLIC AGENTS

 Embolic agents generally can be classified into three categories:

1. Occlusive devices,
2. Microparticles, and
3. Liquids.
 OCCLUSIVE DEVICES

 Balloons for large vessel occlusions,

 Braided silk threads which are highly thrombogenic, and coils.
 Fibered coils, in particular, are usually platinum coils with polyester fibers attached to
increase thrombogenicity.
 Coils can be used to permanently occlude larger arterial feeders.
 PARTICLES

 Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA):

Radiolucent
 irregularly shaped: 50-μm-100 μm.
 Selected sizes : 45 to 1180 μm.
 Appropriate particle size selection: enough to lodge within the nidus.
 Exact sizes of the largest and smallest nidus vessels may be obscure.
 Particles must not reflux into en passage or transit vessels and occlude capillary beds of
normal brain tissue
 Drawback:
 High recanalization rate after angiographically confirmed obliteration.
 A patent nidus may simply recruit new vasculature by the mechanisms of
angiogenesis and arteriogenesis.
 Embospheres:
 Trisacryl gelatin microspheres: Better pack vessels than PVA particles.
 Liquids

 N-Butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and EVOH (ethylene and vinyl alcohol) (Onyx):
 The primary difference is in their mechanical properties for delivery.
 On contact with an ionic solution such as blood, NBCA polymerizes to form a solid cast
that strongly adheres to surrounding structures such as the endothelium of a nidus vessel.
 Polymer flowing past the shunt into the venous circulation, risking pulmonary
embolism
 Sometime may stick with catheter: conversion to microsurgery.
Surgical planning
 Microsurgery

 The microsurgical resection of an AVM must take into consideration the complex nature
of its feeding arteries and draining veins.
 First, the ectatic, high blood flow and irregular pattering of AVM vessels generally give
them a different appearance under direct visualization com- pared to normal cerebral
vessels.
 Second, feeding arteries can usually be distinguished from draining veins not by sight, as
the veins will usually have arterialized blood, but by noting if the distal vessel collapses
with gentle occlusion.
 Third, unless there is definite evidence on an angiogram that an artery is a direct nidus
feeder, the surgeon should always secure the feeding artery as close to the nidus as
possible to ensure this is no en passage artery feeding normal brain.
 BASIC TENETS OF AVM
SURGERY
1. Wide exposure: Define the venous drainage.
2. Most often, proximal and distal vessels around the nidus is a venous drainage. Since
artery will be feeding from the depth.
2. Occlude feeding (terminal) arteries before draining veins (lesions with a single draining
vein can become impossible to deal with if premature blockage of the draining vein occurs,
e.g. by kinking, coagulation)
3. Excision of whole nidus is necessary to protect against rebleeding (occluding feeding
arteries is not adequate)
4. Identify and spare vessels of passage and adjacent (uninvolved) arteries
5. Dissect directly on nidus of AVM, work in sulci and fissures whenever possible
6. In lesions that are high-flow on angiography, consider preoperative embolization
7. Lesions with supplies from multiple vascular territories may require staging
8. Clip accessible aneurysms on feeding arteries.
 BASIC TENETS OF AVM
SURGERY
 Securing the individual vessels can be done with low power bipolar coagulation.
 However, the pathological nature of the AVM vessel wall (thin) may not allow it to be
sufficiently coagulated to withstand arterial pressures.
 Excessive bipolar coagulation usage can cause retraction into eloquent tissue and
significant neurological morbidity.
 Sundt vascular microclips (small feeder) and aneurysm clips (for large feeders) should
always be loaded and ready for use.
 Planning: portion of the nidus should be inside the line of resection.
 With the arteries identified and secured, dissection of the nidus can begin
 One of the principles of AVM resection is that the draining veins be preserved at all costs
to avoid an intranidal pressure increase, which may facilitate rupture.
 The last structures to be secured before removing the nidus are the draining veins.
 How to differentiate vein from artery in
AVM
Due to arterialization of vein, sometime its difficult to differentiate it from artery.
1. Size
 Vein dilates to considerable size due to lack of smooth muscle, any vessels >4mm is a
vein unless proven otherwise.
2. Flow on occlusion
 On gentle compression of vein, it will collapse distally unlike artery.
3. Colour
 Though due to oxygenated blood both appear red, but on careful view under
illuminant microscopy, vein appears bright red due to thin muscular layer and artery
appears light pink.
4. Courses
 Arteries dive into sulci and fissure when veins rise to the surface toward sinuses.
 INTRAOPERATIVE BLEED

 Lowest Cotton pressure to occlude bleeding

 Intranidal bleed exploration leads to multiple bleeding source: difficult
 Rapid isolation of the suspected vascular pedicle should be attempted while anesthesia is
notified of the blood loss.
 Blood pressure reduction and packing of the surgical cavity may assist in localizing the
hemorrhage, followed by more aggressive surgical exploration
 Prevention of NPPB

 Patient should ideally be pre-treated with propranolol 20 mg PO QID for 3 days to

minimize post-op normal perfusion pressure breakthrough (postulated cause of
postoperative bleeding and edema.
 Labetalol has also been used peri-operatively to keep MAP 70–80 mm Hg
Angioarchitectural Features with Associated Risks at
Endovascular
Treatment or Radiosurgery for Brain
AVMs
 Post op Imaging

 It is generally advisable to undergo an angiogram to confirm total resection of the AVM

prior to discharge.
 POST OP COMPLICATION

 Delayed postoperative deterioration may be due to any of the following:

 Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough: characterized by post-op swelling or
hemorrhage.
 Thought to be due to loss of autoregulation, although this theory has been challenged.26
Risk may
be reduced by pre-op medication
 Occlusive hyperemia in the immediate post-op period probably due to obstruction of
venous outflow from adjacent normal brain, in a delayed presentation may be due to
delayed thrombosis of draining vein or dural sinus. Risk may be elevated by keeping the
patient “dry” post-op re-bleeding from a retained nidus of AVM
 Seizures
 Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

 Stereotactic radiosurgery has been recognized as a major treatment modality for AVMs.
 Radiation induces a biological effect that is dependent on cellular mitosis
 The goal of radiosurgery : sufficient ionizing radiation to the complete nidus volume to
obliterate arteriovenous shunting.
 Ideal alternative : comorbid patients, difficult AVMs to resect.
 Obliteration rates: 60% to 85%: dependent on size.
 Indications of Radiosurgery

 Deep seated
 Eloquent area of brain
 Patient unsuitable of GA
 Residual AVM after surgery/Embolisation: But Size and volume
constraints
 Take time to act- risk of bleed.
 RADIATION DOSE

 Conventional: 25Gy
 Less than 18Gy not effective
 Ideal: 20-22Gy (Brainstem 18-20Gy)
 Re-radiation should be done only after 4 years

 Large: Embolisation  SRS

 DRAWBACKS

 Delay of 2 to 5 years between treatment and nidus obliteration.

 Does not reduce bleeding risk: Applying the 2.7% annual rate leaves a 2- to 5-year
actuarial risk of 5.3% to 12.7%.
 Risk: Post-radiation edema, cyst formation, and radionecrosis.
 Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough or premature venous occlusion: minimal
than surgery/embolization.
 AVM is a biologically dynamic structure: compensate if the radiation dose is
insufficient.
 OBLITERATION

 Successful AVM obliteration:

1. Size: <3 mL or a nidus or <2 cm,
2. Sharp delineation of the nidus border on imaging,
3. Younger age,
4. Fewer draining veins, and
5. Hemispheric location.
6. If unobliterated: 4 to 6 weeks to let the nidus achieve a stable geometry before re-
radiosurgery is performed.
 CAUSE OF FAILURE

 Inaccurate Nidus

 DSA delineates the actual target nidus than MRA/CTA

 Radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation (AVM)
grading
scale
Pollock and Flickinger
 To predict patient outcomes after radiosurgery.
 AVM score = (0.1)*(volume, mL) + (0.02)*(age, yr) + (0.3)*(location,
hemispheric/corpus callosum/cerebellar = 0; basal ganglia/thalamus/brainstem = 1).

Chance (in %) of excellent outcome (with 95% CI)

 AVM score ≤1.00: 89% (79-94)
 AVM score 1.01 - 1.50: 70% (59-
79)
 AVM score 1.51 - 2.00: 64% (51-75)
 AVM score >2.00: 46% (33-60)

 Chance (in %) of modified Rankin Scale decline (with 95% CI)

 AVM score ≤1.00: 0 (0-8)
 AVM score 1.01 - 1.50: 13 %(7-22)
 AVM score 1.51 - 2.00: 20% (12-32)
 AVM score >2.00: 36% (24-50)

Ref: Pollock BE, Flickinger JC. Modification of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation grading system. Neurosurgery 2008;
63:239-4
Follow-up of treated
AVMs
After satisfactory complete angiographic obliteration

Catheter angiogram (not CTA or MRA): 1 & 5 years.

 Failure of SRS

 Persistent arteriovenous shunting demonstrated on angiography 5 years after treatment.

 Options for therapy include revisiting multimodality treatment.
Special scenario
 Arteriovenous Malformations in the
Pediatric Population
 Hemorrhage> seizures> congestive heart failure>neurological deficit. Congestive heart
failure is a symptom
 CCF: left-to-right cardiovascular shunting (vein of Galen malformation)
 Poor prognosis: Critical care support and neuroendovascular advance.
 Aggressive treatment is warranted: Microsurgical resection with preoperative
embolization, if necessary.
 Higher lifetime risk of recurring hemorrhage
 Better recovery from initial deficits.
 Surgically resected AVMs in the pediatric population have occasionally been observed to
recur; these patients, therefore, need long-term follow-up.
 Hypothesis: microshunting: not apparent on angiography: enlarges over time.
 AVM and Pregnancy

 AVMs are likely present during a woman’s reproductive years.

 Hemodynamic alterations during pregnancy. ↑ risk of ICH.
 TBV ↑ 40%; CO ↑ 60% to match ↑ vascular resistance. HTN near delivery.
 2nd or 3rd trimester or early postpartum period.
 If a pregnant patient presents with a hemorrhage from an AVM, the risk of re-bleed during
the same pregnancy can be up to 27%.
 This risk can be mitigated only with total resection of the AVM.
 Seizures: anticonvulsants: Teratogenicity (1st trimester): ensure safe AED.
 TREATMENT

 Treating an AVM during pregnancy, however, entails risks to both mother and fetus.
 The patient needs to be followed in a high-risk pregnancy setting and delivered by
cesarean section.
 Pregnant patients with unruptured AVMs should consider definitive treatment after
parturition.
 If a patient presents with a life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage, immediate surgical
evacuation is necessary for stabilization
 Radiosurgery: not a viable option.
 Risks to the fetus and its slow rate of occlusion,
 Endovascular therapies:
 Risk: radiation, contrast agent, and embolic solvents.
 Microsurgical resection: Patient wishes to have treatment before delivery.
 The patient should be made aware that although these medications may pose a minimal
teratogenic risk, especially in the first trimester, they provide the safest option for both
mother and child as opposed to immediate surgical treatment

 Aneurysm with
AVM
 The increased flow associated with AVM vessels is thought to predispose them to
aneurysm formation because their walls will experience higher shear stress.

 The pathogenesis of AVM and concomitant aneurysms may relate to a combination of

factors such as underlying vascular defect, hemodynamic stress, vasoactive substances,
and locally generated growth factors.
Categories of Aneurysm associated with
AVM
 Aneurysms with
AVMs
 Aneurysms with AVMs can be characterized into four types
1. Unrelated to flow vessels (remote);
2. Arising at the circle of Willis origin of a vessel supplying the AVM
3. (proximal);

4. Arising from the midcourse of a feeding pedicle (pedicular); and

Arising from within the nidus itself (intranidal).
 The latter three types can be classified as “flow- related” aneurysms.

Proximal Peduncular

COW
Intranidal

Remote

Ellenbogen Principles of Neurological Surgery,4th ed

 General Principles

 AVM + Aneurysm can present with ICH, SAH (R/o by CTA, MRA)
 Higher risk of aneurysm re- rupture
 Higher risk of morbidity and death.
 Flow related aneurysm associated with AVM may regress after AVM resection.
 Proximal flow-related aneurysms (ie, proximal on artery which supplies brain AVM)
rarely regress with brain AVM treatment.
 Distal flow-related aneurysms (ie, distal on feeding artery): High prospect
 AVM is surgically treatable and the aneurysm can be secured
 Treat both in the same setting.
 Resection of the AVM is not feasible in acute setting.
 Treat the aneurysm by any means acutely and leave the nidus alone for later

Proximal Peduncular

COW
Intranidal

Remote
 INTRANIDAL ANEURYSM

 Resides within the nidus: Difficult to visualize.

 Difficult to diagnose its rupture as cause of ICH.
 Need to deal simultaneously.
 Un-resectable nidus: limited endovascular embolic therapy to occlude arterial pedicle
feeding aneurysm.
LANDMARK STUDIES IN
AVM
 FINNISH TRIAL 2008: 55 YEAR F/U
 Objective: Long-term follow-up studies in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) have been scarce and
without proper statistical estimates of mortality. We performed a retrospective survival study in 623 consecutive
patients with AVMs admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery in Helsinki University Hospital between 1951 and
2005.
 Methods: Patients were followed from admission until death or the end of 2005. Patient survival was estimated using the
relative survival ratio, which provides a measure of the excess mortality experienced by the patients compared with the
general Finnish population matched by age, sex, and calendar time.
 Results: Median follow-up was 11.9 years,.
 Treatment was conservative in 155 patients.
 Total AVM occlusion was attained in 356 patients, and partial occlusion was obtained in 94
 patients.
 Overall, 206 deaths were observed. Of these, 100 were related to AVMs.
Diagnosis of AVM was associated with significant long-term excess mortality, with cumulative relative survival
ratios of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.88) and 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.75) at 10 and 30
 years after admission, respectively.
 Men had higher excess mortality than women.
The excess in mortality was highest in
 conservatively treated patients, intermediate
in patients with partially occluded AVMs,
and lowest in those with totally occluded
 Conclusion:
AVMs. AVMs are associated with long-term excess mortality that may be reduced by active, even partial,
treatment. Male patients have a higher excess mortality rate than female patients.
The subgroup with the best outcome consisted of those with totally occluded unruptured AVMs, which did not
demonstrate excess mortality after the first year.

Finnish study. Laakso A et al. Long-term excess mortality in 623 patients with brain arteriovenous
malformations.
Neurosurgery 2008.
 How Safe Is Arteriovenous Malformation Surgery?
A Prospective, Observational Study of Surgery As
First-Line Treatment

 Methods: Data were collected on 640 consecutively enrolled in a

AVMs
database that included all patients not considered for surgery
 Surgical risk:
 SM 1,2: 0.7%
 SM 3 to 4 in non-eloquent cortex: 17%
 SM grade 3 to 5 AVMs in eloquent cortex (n = 168): 21%
offer
 CONCLUSION: The results
surgery as a preferred of this
treatment series
option for suggest that1 ittois2 reasonable
SM grade AVMs. This
tostudy
also reinforces the predictive value of SM grading system, with some caveats.

Davidson AS et al. How Safe Is Arteriovenous Malformation Surgery? A Prospective, Observational Study of Surgery As First-Line Treatment for Brain
Arteriovenous Malformations. Neurosurgery. 2010.
 Microsurgical removal of unruptured
AVM

 Steiger et al. also demonstrated that microsurgical removal of unruptured Spetzler-Martin

grade 1 and 2 AVMs produced more favorable long-term results than the modeled natural
history, while surgical treatment of Spetzler-Martin grades 3 and 4 AVM did not.

Steiger HJ et al. Microsurgical resection of Spetzler-Martin grades 1 and 2 un-ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations results
in lower long- term morbidity and loss of quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) than conservative management–results of a
single group series. Acta Neurochir. 2015.
 ARUBA TRIAL

A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain

Arteriovenous
Malformation
 Colombian multicenter RCT study on management of unruptured AVMs.
 Medical management alone VS medical management and prophylactic interventional
therapy
(endovascular, surgical, and radiation therapy, alone or in combination)

The primary end point was the composite measure of death from any cause or any stroke

The secondary analysis :functional status and quality of life at a minimum of 5 years.

An interim analysis performed after 6 years led to discontinuation of the study due to
excessive

morbidity in the treatment arm as compared with the conservatively treated cohort.

223 patients; Mean F/U 33.3 months.
April 4, 2007 and ended on April 15, 2013 after following 223 patients for 33 months

on average.
An interim analysis performed after 6 years led to discontinuation of the study due to 3-

fold increase in their risk of death or stroke than those who only received pharmacological
treatment.
Results: Stroke or death: medical management group (10.1%:) and Interventional therapy group
(30.7%)
 Arguments

 ARUBA trial argues that the best treatment for these patients is solely medical
management, using anticonvulsants if the patient has seizures, and analgesics if the
patient experiences headaches.
 However, the ARUBA trial has received plenty of criticism concerning its study design
and the credibility of its findings.
 Critiques
 1.Even prior to commencement of enrollment, the design of the ARUBA study had been heavily criticized, particularly
in regard to the proposed 5-year follow-up period, which many argued would unfairly detect all procedure related
complications but would be too short to detect the potential long-term benefits of prophylactic intervention.
 2. Methodology failure:
 Problem with ARUBA study had to do with the trial hypothesis: that conservative management improves patient
outcomes as compared to prophylactic intervention.
 They explain how this hypothesis is not only unusual but illogical because intervention should have been the
experimental arm that needed to be tested against conservative management, which should have been the control
group, and not vice versa. In fact, it is unethical to presume that intervention is harmful and inferior to medical
therapy and then decide to prove it.
 Inadequate analysis: Inappropriately drawn conclusions were the most frequently cited critiques, followed by the lack of
subgroup analyses and the lack of detail regarding the treatment results.
 Generalisation: Microsurgery occurred in only 14.9% of ARUBA intervention cases, raising concerns about the study’s
generalizability.
 Ethical consideration:
 Is it ethical, at least in the mind of a competent cerebrovascular surgeon, to randomize a young patient with a small
anterior frontal pole AVM to conservative management and thus expose him/her to the definite, albeit small, risk of
hemorrhage, and deny him/ her the chance of a cure through resection, which can be performed with minimal
morbidity?
 Conversely, would we randomize an older patient with a Spetzler-Martin (S-M) Grade V AVM knowing that any
intervention in this setting is ineffective, very dangerous, or both? Do we disregard personal experience and the
wealth of literature accumulated over the years because it is being not obtained through RCTs?
 Final

 We must keep in mind that cerebral AVMs are uncommon complex lesions
and
that no two patients are similar.
 There are many confounding factors that influence both the natural history and
the risk of intervention, and thus it becomes impossible and impractical to
conduct a study that can account for every possible combination of variables.
 BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION

References:
1.Ellenbogen Principle of Neurological surgery 4th edition
2.Greenberg Handbook of Neurosurgery; 8th edition
3.Michael T Lawton: Seven AVM: Tenets and Techniques for resection.
4.Beijnum JV et al. Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011.
5.The ARUBA Trial: A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. http://arubastudy.org/
6.Finnish study: Laakso A et al. Long-term excess mortality in 623 patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery.2008
7.Meling TR.To treat or not to treat brain AVMs—that’s still the question. Acta Neurochir. 2017.
8.Davidson A et al. How Safe Is Arteriovenous Malformation Surgery? Neurosurgery. 2010.
9.Pollock BE, Flickinger JC. Modification of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation grading system. Neurosurgery 2008;
63:239-4
NATIONAL INSTITUTEMEMORIAL
UPENDRA DEVKOTA OF NEUROLOGICAL
NATIONALAND ALLIED OF
INSTITUTE SCIENCES, BANSBARI,
NEUROLOGICAL AND KATHMANDU
ALLIED
SCIENCES,
BANSBARI, KATHMANDU

Thank you
