Final Effective Facilitation
Final Effective Facilitation
Final Effective Facilitation
Dr JP Upadhyay
Facilitation?
Process
What you
cover.
Facilitative Approach
• Creating a structure that is open and flexible
enough to allow for exploration of issues.
• Visual.
• Auditory.
ACTIVIST
Concrete
Experience
Experiential REFLECTOR
PRAGMATISTS
Learning
Reflective
Active
Observation
experimentation
THEORIST
Abstract
Conceptualisation
Group dynamics
• “Group dynamics is the combined configuration
of mental (cognitive), emotional and physical
energy in the group at any given time; and the
way in which that configuration undergoes
change” (Heron, J; 1999)
Heron Model of Facilitation
Planning Dimension
Role of Facilitator in planning agenda and focus of the group
Moving group to self-manage time and outcome
Meaning Dimension
Role of facilitator ensuring everyone understands meaning and interpretation
of all experiences and contributions by members Moving from high to low
intervention or interpretation
Confronting Dimension
Role of facilitator in raising consciousness about the group’s resistance to
and avoidance of issues to face and deal with. Challenging defensive and distorted
behaviour, beliefs or inappropriate attitudes. Moving from high to low
confrontation
Heron Model of Facilitation (cont.)
Feeling Dimension
Role of Facilitator in enabling group to manage the emotional affective
dimension within group dynamics
Structuring Dimension
Role of facilitator in ensuring managing process and learning task -
determining focus, learning resources available etc.
Valuing Dimension
Role of facilitator in creating environment where individuals can be
genuine on self disclosure in a climate of personal value, integrity and
respect.
Feeling Dimension:
(Management of feeling and emotion)
• Are we all feeling involved and able to participate, at this stage?
• We seem to be in a high emotional state which is impacting on our ability
to work together; why is this? What can we do?
• How far does everyone feel understood and respected?
• Our dialogue seems to becoming irrational and emotional; should we take
a little time out for reflection?
• How are we feeling about this decision making stage?
• I sense that there are high levels of frustration within the group; do we
need to address this?
• Do you feel the group is working well together? What do you think is going
well? Is there anything we need to address?
• I sense that there is a high level of emotional maturity being
demonstrated within the group. Do we need to be acknowledging /
supporting this more?
Meaning Dimension (Interpretation)
• “We have been discussing this aspect for some time now, can anyone
summarise what we have learnt?”
• “Can I ask, x, what do you mean by y”
• “X, you have mentioned y a number of times now, why is this a recurring
theme?
• Do you think that we have a shared understanding about the problem?
• Are we moving ahead to solutions without having fully understood the
problem?
• We have spent a long time on this dimension – why do you think that is?
• Why is it that we all have such divergent views?
• Are there any other underlying themes which we should be surfacing and
considering?
• X – do you see any relationship between a and b? Is so what? Why?
Confronting Dimension:
(Raising consciousness about resistance / avoidance / blockages)
• “I wonder whether behaviour X is a way of avoiding y – what do you
think?
• Contributions are being blocked from this group – why is that occuring?
• I think we are getting stuck in behaviour y – what can be done about this?
• Can anyone tell me, why are we struggling with this issue?
• We don’t seem to be able to move forward –what is going on in terms of
the group dynamics here?
• We agreed in our ground rules to …., why are we breaking with that?
• I think we are low in energy and challenge – what should we do about
this?
• Does the group feel it is open to consider new ideas or are we preferring
to stick to the traditional ones?
Five Stages of Group Development
• Forming
• Storming
• Norming
• Performing
• Adjourning
Forming
• Task completion
• Bringing closure to decisions
• Bringing closure to roles
• Summarizing agreements
• Foreshadowing issues for the next meeting
Facilitator’s Role in Group Stages
• Forming: to be more directive by clearly articulating the purpose of
the meeting/group and discussing ground rules for group
functioning
• Storming: to help members deal with conflict, clarify differing
viewpoints, and make sure hidden agendas or viewpoints are
revealed-keep people focused on the big picture (it is about the
students)
• Norming: to use problem-solving skills to mediate differing
positions, clarify any role ambiguity, and when appropriate refocus
the purpose or rules for group functioning
• Performing: to be a collaborator and to keep the group moving in a
nondirective manner-stay out of the way and manage time
• Adjourning: to summarize decisions and clearly articulate
responsibilities of group members
Personality Attributes of Facilitator
Preparation & Planning
for process •
•
boundaries
Building consensus
Redefining issues if necessary
consultancy •
4. Getting There
• Brainstorm barriers and ways to overcome them
• Breaking down options/ideas into tasks - who, what, where, when
(CREATE) •
•
Gaining agreement
5. Commitment to Action
• Making decisions
• Action planning
• Building commitment
• Review process, outcomes, amend and monitor
Thanks