Principles of Monitoring & Evaluation - Notes
Principles of Monitoring & Evaluation - Notes
& Evaluation
February 2020 Edition
Noel Muzondo
+263 772 402 560
noelmuzondo@gmail.com
https://chat.whatsapp.com/GesWqajiYVc3FSs5lj2apf
that the private sector has a big role to play in the attainment of these
goals (see World Investment Report – United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development, 2014) and this is with reference to SDG 17.
Environmental Quality
Water and Sanitation
Personal Rights
Personal Safety
Opportunity
Shelter
Mauritius 73.24 89.44 72.84 57.46 96.32 97.64 81.02 82.77 94.14 74.40 61.48 61.34 62.27 69.67 67.21 30.69
South Africa 67.60 66.95 68.23 67.61 87.00 72.96 66.02 41.84 85.12 78.50 45.63 63.19 75.15 75.73 66.40 53.14
Botswana 67.03 71.94 70.37 58.77 75.76 77.48 59.52 75.00 86.85 70.41 53.41 70.82 76.25 77.78 60.13 20.90
Namibia 62.01 61.75 66.14 58.14 65.25 57.99 57.74 65.99 74.53 73.50 50.11 66.42 80.63 75.38 53.52 23.02
Malawi 53.44 54.62 57.82 47.87 67.08 50.52 34.37 66.50 66.12 41.94 61.20 62.01 75.45 59.24 38.20 14.59
Lesotho 52.39 53.44 51.56 52.17 67.69 45.32 41.98 58.76 60.05 61.02 37.92 47.23 67.16 61.86 54.74 24.94
Swaziland 51.76 58.08 56.33 40.87 65.58 54.56 49.88 62.29 76.04 53.24 39.77 56.25 18.76 64.74 56.09 23.91
Tanzania 49.99 47.13 60.95 41.90 66.84 23.35 36.47 61.84 61.14 51.57 64.31 66.79 48.84 54.01 39.04 25.70
Zimbabwe 49.11 51.29 62.33 33.72 61.46 44.43 47.02 52.26 75.98 57.58 56.26 59.49 14.01 53.84 39.90 27.14
Mozambique 47.96 45.50 58.76 39.62 62.06 19.95 41.17 58.83 56.86 53.65 62.79 61.76 58.28 38.11 59.63 10.47
Madagascar 45.91 43.76 56.91 37.05 69.12 15.91 24.50 65.52 62.93 43.79 62.95 57.96 43.37 40.32 48.14 16.37
Angola 39.70 43.74 49.73 25.65 62.41 27.69 31.12 53.73 52.19 52.23 51.58 42.91 21.36 23.77 43.13 14.32
Zambia 49.19 42.49 54.75 36.13 40.63 65.26 53.97 64.68 59.00 40.32 60.81 46.75 22.09
DRC 51.99 28.72 19.70 27.03 40.55 60.42 41.50 55.58 50.48 24.34 36.03 36.79 17.70
Regional
Annual 55.01 56.68 60.30 45.15 69.33 45.97 45.61 60.80 70.18 57.66 54.83 58.98 50.44 56.52 50.69 23.21
Noel Muzondo, Principles of M&E,
Mean* MDU UZ 01/24/2021 10
The Human Development Index (HDI)
The measures the opportunities people have during their
lifetime—life expectancy at birth (measured in years), mean
years of schooling and expected years of schooling, and gross
national income (GNI) per capita, which are aggregated into an
HDI value ranging from 0 to 1.
◦ To me this means that M&E officers do not just need budgeting and scheduling skills but
also project and programme management skills (Explain).
Can you notice how these actions feed into the project and programme
planning processes?
Also note how the steps above relate to Kusek and Rist’s (2004) 10-step
M&E in the next slide.
concerned?
Who will own the system? Who will benefit from the
system? How much information do they really want?
3.1 Introduction
◦ Your introduction could, ideally, have a topic sentence summarising your understanding
of the question or the key concepts, theories or ideas in the question
◦ It should also identify one or two key terms and define them
◦ Ideally, the introduction should summarise the answer.
3.2 Alternative approaches to building and introducing an RBME in a an
organisation
3.2.1 Whole-of-government
3.2.2 Enclave approach
3.2.3 Mixed approach
3.3 Recommendation: Mixed approach
3.4 Conclusion
gauge of something
Types of indicators
Financial Customer
Perspective Perspective
Innovation &
Internal Business
Learning
Perspective
Perspective
Leadership Perspective
01/24/2021
Noel Muzondo, Principles of M&E,
MDU UZ 46
Key terms in definitions of projects:
characterisation of projects
◦ unique venture with a beginning and an end
◦ established goals
◦ parameters of cost, schedule and quality
(performance) goals
◦ set of people and other resources temporarily
assembled to reach a specified objective
◦ fixed budget
◦ fixed time period
◦ products and/or procedures
◦ dedicated resources
◦ single point of responsibility
Power
High Low
Interest
Hence “there is much discussion about whether there is only one ‘true’
model of a project life-cycle or many, and whether these are accurate
descriptions of what happens in real life” (Field and Keller, 1998, p.61).
Field and Keller also admit that there is no single life-cycle that applies
to all projects so a model that one adopts may be determined by the
situation.
As such, in this course chapter we present two project life cycle models.
Compare Value
Value Value
alternatives engineering
planning assessment
Firm Infrastructure
Human Resources Management
Technology Development Margins
Procurement
Margins
Primary
Activities
Executing
Planning Closing
Defining
Identification
Evaluation Lesson
learning Design
Implementation
Monitoring Evaluation
Definition of objectives
◦ Define project vision/overall goal
◦ Define project objectives (between 3 & 5 objectives at most)
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Define stage and project document
3.3 Planning stage and project document
3.4 Execute stage and project document
3.5 Close stage and project document
3.6 Conclusion
Whereas the stages follow each other in linear form, they are not as
clear-cut and straight forward to handle in practice; they overlap
hence requiring planners move back and forth during the planning
process, revising what will have been written.
A baseline is a foundation. It is the basis from which an individual can start or build on in
the process of executing something.
◦ Thus baseline information is the information about the project situation which enable
project managers or M&E officers to define goals, objectives or performance targets
e.g. existing awareness or knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and behaviours
regarding a product or issue.
◦ Without baseline information, the task of goal setting can be daunting if not
impossible.
◦ Baseline information
◦ Interview schedule
◦ Open-end question
◦ Sample
◦ Research process
◦ Focus group discussions
Consonance
◦ The programme or project must be adaptable or adaptive
to its environment. This means projects and programme
documents and project and programmes themselves have
to be continuously adapted so that they maintain a viable
fit with the environment.
Feasibility
◦ The final broad test of a project or programme is its feasibility
given the pressures exerted on it by the environment.
A small NGO that employed 23 people, which I worked for,
positioned itself as a national organisation hence always faced
challenges in demonstrating impact; it was thinly spread.
“Project and programme evaluation should go beyond the obvious facts concerning
the short-term health of a project or programme and appraise instead the more
important factors and developments that determine success.” Critically evaluate this
statement. Assignment question – October 2013 Cohort.
References
◦ Kling, N.D (1985) “The Marketing Audit: An Extension of the Marketing Control Process”,
Managerial Finance, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp.23 – 26.
◦ Rumelt, R. (1980) “The evaluation of business strategy”, in de Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (1998)
Strategy: Process, Content, Context – An International Perspective, 2 nd Edition, London: Thomson
Learning.
Programme
Executive Certificate in Programme and Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Course
Principles of Monitoring and Evaluation
Facilitator
Noel Muzondo (Mr)
+263 772 402 560
noelmuzondo@gmail.com
Instructions
•Present your answer in management report format i.e. use suitable subheadings throughout
•Length – minimum 4 pages and maximum 5 pages excluding cover page and references
•Deadline – First day of the next course
Noel Muzondo, Principles of M&E,
MDU UZ 01/24/2021 97
Thermometer
“Assignment question – February 2015 Group
The logframe is the foundation of a good
monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework for
any development intervention, project or
programme.” Critically evaluate the statement.
Practice question
“Project and programme planning are only
different in time horizon. In practice, they are
similar in steps and or components.” Discuss.
3.1 Introduction
Instructions
◦ Maximum length excluding references and cover page—6 pages.
◦ Present your answer in management report format i.e. use
subheadings.
◦ Answer must be typed in Times New Roman, use 1.5 line spacing
and pages must be numbered.
◦ Cover page must have your full name, programme name, course
name, your intake group i.e. June 2016 Group or date of
submission, the facilitator’s name, and question.
Brief
Write a two-year funding project proposal for the organisation to be submitted to SAIDA—an
emerging international development aid agency of the South African government. SAIDA has
recently asked for funding proposals from 16 non-governmental organisations,
Mupfura/Amarula Project being one of them.
(100 marks x 0.3)
timetable.
Assignments are submitted to the MDU office not to me
please.