Review Module ON Criminal Law 1
Review Module ON Criminal Law 1
Review Module ON Criminal Law 1
ON
CRIMINAL LAW 1
CRIMINAL LAW 1
INTRODUCTION:
Before the Spanish Colony, we have
Criminal Law, “The Code of Kalantiao”,
which often termed as the First Penal
Law in the History of the Philippines.
Under this code, if a man would have a
relation with a married woman, he is
penalized.
CRIMINAL LAW 1
3.) Felony
-is an act or omission punishable by
The Revised Penal Code.
4.) Offense
-may be defined as an act or omission
punishable by Special Laws.
CRIMINAL LAW 1
5.) CRIMINAL LAW
-may be defined as a branch of public or municipal
law, which defines crimes, treats of their nature and
provides for their punishment.
6.) Omission
-means inaction, failure to do a positive duty, which
one is bound to do.
7.) Act
-means any bodily movement tending to produce
some effect in the external world.
DIFFERENT
PHILOSOPHIES
UNDERLYING CRIMINAL
LAW SYSTEM:
PHILOSOPHIES UNDERLYING
CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM
1.) Classical/Juristic Theory
-Best remembered by the maxim “an eye
for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. The purpose
of penalty is retribution. The offender is made
to suffer for the wrong he has done.
A man is regarded as a moral creature who
understands right from wrong; he must be
prepared to accept the punishment therefore.
PHILOSOPHIES UNDERLYING
CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM
2.) Positive/Realistic Theory
-The purpose of penalty is reformation.
Crimes are regarded as a social
phenomenon, which constrains a person to
do wrong although not his own volition. A
tendency towards crime is the product of
one’s environment. There is no such thing as
natural born killer. This was criticized as
being too lenient.
PHILOSOPHIES UNDERLYING
CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM
3.) Eclectic/Mixed Theory
-This combines both positivist and
classical thinking. Crimes that are
economic and social in nature should be
dealt with in a positivist manner, thus the
law is more compassionate. Heinous
crimes should be dealt with in a classical
manner, thus capital punishment. The
Revised Penal Code follows the
mixed/eclectic theory.
PHILOSOPHIES UNDERLYING
CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM
3.) Eclectic/Mixed Theory
Example:
Intoxication of the offender is considered
to mitigate his criminal liability, unless it is
intentional or habitual.
A woman who killed her child to conceal
her dishonor has in her favor mitigating
circumstances.
BASIC MAXIMS IN
CRIMINAL LAW
BASIC MAXIMS IN
CRIMINAL LAW
1.) Doctrine of PRO REO
-Whenever a penal law is to be
constructed or applied and the law
admits of two interpretations, one
lenient to the offender, and one strict to
the offender, the latter interpretation,
which is lenient of favorable to the
offender, will be adopted.
BASIC MAXIMS IN
CRIMINAL LAW
1.) Doctrine of PRO REO
-This is in consonance with the
fundamental rule that all doubts shall be
construed in favor of the accused and
consistent with presumption of
innocence of the accused.
BASIC MAXIMS IN
CRIMINAL LAW
2.) Nullum Crimen Nulla Poena Sine
Legis
-There is no crime when there is no law
punishing the same. Because of this
maxim, there is no common law crime
in the Philippines, no matter how
wrongful, evil or bad the acts is, if there
is no law defining the act, the same is
not considered a crime.
BASIC MAXIMS IN
CRIMINAL LAW
1.) GENERALITY
-That the law is binding upon all
persons who reside or sojourn in the
Philippines, irrespective of age, sex,
color, creed or personal circumstances.
(Art. 114, NCC);
THREE GENERAL
CHARACTERISITIC OF
CRIMINAL LAW
2.) TERRITORIALITY
-That the law is applicable to all crimes
committed within the limits of Philippine
territory, which includes its atmosphere,
interior waters and maritime zone. (Art. 2,
RPC, see Art. 1 of the Philippine
Constitution);
THREE GENERAL
CHARACTERISITIC OF
CRIMINAL LAW
3.) IRRETROSPECTIVITY OR
PROSPECTIVITY
-That the law does not have any
retroactive effect (Art. 4, NCC) except if
it favors the offender (Art. 22, RPC)
who is not a habitual criminal (Art. 62,
par. 5 RPC).
THREE GENERAL
CHARACTERISITIC OF
CRIMINAL LAW
-Penal laws shall not be given retroactive
effect. Acts or omission will only be subject to a
penal law if they are committed after a penal
law had already taken effect. Penal laws
operate only prospectivity.
Exception: If the penal law is favorable to the
accused.
Exemption to the exception: If the accused is
habitual delinquent.
THREE GENERAL
CHARACTERISITIC OF
CRIMINAL LAW
Example:
A, was convicted for illegal Possession of
firearm in 1995. The penalty for IP of F/A at
that time was 12 years and 1 day to 20 years.
On 1998 a law was passed lowering the
penalty to 6 years and 1 day to 10 years. Will
the new law be given retroactive effect to “A”
that is now serving his sentence?
THREE GENERAL
CHARACTERISITIC OF
CRIMINAL LAW
Answer:
Yes, the law can be retroactively
applied because it is favorable to the
accused.
ART. 2
EXTRA-TERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION
(Exception to
territoriality)
EXTRA-TERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION
Rules as to jurisdiction over crimes
committed abroad a foreign merchant
vessel:
1.) French Rule:
This rule suggest that such crimes are
not triable in the court of that country,
unless their commission affects the
peace and security or the safety of the
state is endangered.
EXTRA-TERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION
2.) English Rule:
Meaning, such crimes are triable in that
country, unless they merely affects
things within the vessel or they refer to
the internal management thereof.
Take Note:
The English rule is what is being applied
here in the Philippines.
FELONIES & CIRCUMSTANCES
WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL
LIABILITY
ART. 3
-FELONIES (Either by dolo or culpa)
ELEMENTS OF FELONY
a.) there must be an act of omission
b.) such act or omission is punishable by RPC;
and
c.) committed either by dolo or culpa.
FELONIES & CIRCUMSTANCES
WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL
LIABILITY
Impossible Crime
ART. 5 – DUTY OF
COURTS:
Ex.:
-Conspiracy to and proposal to
commit rebellion, treason and sedition.
ART. 8 – CONSPIRACY AND
PROPOSAL TO COMMIT A
CRIME
JUSTIFYING
CIRCUMSTANCES AND
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH
EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL
LIABILITY
ART 11. – JUSTIFYING
CIRCUMSTANCES
JUSTIFYING
-those wherein the acts of the actor
are in accordance with law, and hence,
he incurs no criminal and civil liability
ART 11. – JUSTIFYING
CIRCUMSTANCES
1.) Self-defense – requisites:
a.) unlawful aggression
b.) reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it; and
c.) lack of sufficient provocation on the
part of the person defending himself.
2.) Defense of relative
ART 11. – JUSTIFYING
CIRCUMSTANCES
3.) Defense of stranger
Penalty Prescribed for The principal in a The principal in an The accessory in a The accessory in an
the Crime frustrated crime and the attempted crime, the frustrated crime, and the attempted crime.
accomplice in a accessory in the accomplices in an
consummated crime. consummated crime, and attempted crime.
the accomplices in a
frustrated crime.
First Case Death Reclusion perpetua Reclusion temporal Prision mayor Prision correccional
2nd Case Reclusion perpetua to Reclusion temporal Prision mayor Prision correccional Arresto mayor
death
3rd Case Reclusion temporal in Prision mayor in its Prision correccional in its Arresto mayor in its Fine and arresto mayor
its maximum period to maximum period to maximum to prision maximum to prision in its minimum and
death reclusion temporal in its mayor in it medium correccional in its medium periods
medium period period medium period
4th Case Prision mayor in its Prision correccional in its Arresto mayor in its Fine and arresto mayor Fine
maximum period to maximum period to prision maximum period to in its minimum and
reclusion temporal in its mayor in its medium period prision correccional in its medium periods
medium medium period
ART. 62 – EFFECT OF THE ATTENDANCE OF
MITIGATING OR AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCES AND OF HABITUAL
DELINQUENCY