EM 531 - Lecture Notes 7
EM 531 - Lecture Notes 7
Observe that 10% is only calculated over the unpaid balance. These 3 annual payments
of $4,021 repay the loan itself and provide a return of 10% on the amount still
outstanding each year.
0 1 2 3 4
1,000
FW(i)= - 1,000(F/P,i*,4)+1,500=0
1,500=1,000 (1+i*)4 (1+i*)4 =1.5
i*= 4√1.5 - 1= 10.67 %
0 1 2
2,000
PW(i)= - 2,000+ 1,300/(1+i) + 1,500 /(1+i) 2=0
Let x= 1/(1+i). Then PW(i)= - 2,000 +1,300 x + 1,500 x 2=0 a quadratic equation.
x=[-1,300±√1,3002-4(1,500)(-2,000)] / 2 (1,500) = 0.8 or -1.667.
0.8=1/(1+i) i=25%
- 1.667 = 1 / (1+i) i = - 160 % has no economic significance (less than -100 %)
Hence, i*=25 %.
Computational methods
Trial-and-error method:
This method does not work for nonsimple investments in which the NPW
function is not monotonically decreasing function of interest rate.
2.8 M
1.8 M
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10 M
PW(i)
accept reject
i
*
Project should be accepted for interest rates below i*.
For interest rates above i*, it should be rejected.
But for nonsimple investment, it is not clear which i* to use to make an
accept/reject decision.
Example:
Project investment cost: $ 1,250,000.
project annual net savings: $ 731,500.
salvage value: $ 80,000 at the end of year 15.
IRR=? If MARR=18%, is the investment justifiable?
Project is a simple investment. unique IRR.
PW(i)=-1,250,000+731,500(P/A,i%,15)+80,000(P/F,i%,15) = 0
EM 531 - Lecture Notes 7 17 Apr. 9, 2013
Internal rate of return (IRR) criterion
Example (cont’d):
PW(50%)=209,842
PW(60%)=-31,822.
The number of real i*s that are greater than -100% for a project
with N periods is never greater than the number of sign
changes in the cash flow series.
The accumulated cash flow series is the sum of the net cash
flows up to, and including a given time.
If the rule of cash flow signs indicates multiple i*s, we should
proceed to “accumulated cash flow sign test” to eliminate some
possibility of multiple rates of return.
If the accumulated series starts negatively and changes sign only
once, a unique positive i* exists.
Example:
Project D n cash flow
0 - 1000
1 3900
2 - 5030
3 2145
i*= 10 %, 30 %, 50 %.
PB(50 %)0= - 1000
PB(50 %)1= - 1000(1+50 %) + 3900= 2400
PB(50 %)2= 2400(1+50 %) - 5030= - 1430
PB(50 %)3= - 1430(1+50 %) + 2145= 0
(-,+,-,0) mixed investment.
EM 531 - Lecture Notes 7 23 Apr. 9, 2013
Mixed versus pure investment projects
Take project C.
i*=29.95 %. MARR=15 %.
C is a pure investment project. PB(29.95%)n ≤ 0.
29.95 % is the true IRR.
IRR > MARR, then the project is acceptable.
PW(15%)=-1000+500(P/F,15%,1)-500(P/F,15%,2)+2000(P/F,15%,3)=$ 371.74.
Since PW(15%) > 0, the project is also acceptable under the NPW criterion.
The IRR and NPW criteria always give the same decision, if the criteria are
applied correctly.
In the pure investment projects, since PB(i*)n ≤ 0, at no time the firm
withdraws money from the project.
The IRR is earned on the funds that remain internally invested in the project.
When PB(i%)n > 0, this money can be put into the firm’s investment pool
until it is needed in the project.
The i% of this investment pool is the interest rate at which the money can be
invested outside the project MARRexternal i.
PB
MARR
IRR time
IRR
PW(i)
Example (cont’d):
Since the project is a mixed project, we need to find the true IRR.
Net investment test: i*=10%, unit=1000
periods 0 1 2
Beg. Balance 0 -1000 1200
Return on invest. 0 -100 120
Payment -1000 2300 -1320
Ending balance -1000 1200 0
Example (cont’d):
n=0 PB(i,15%)0=-1,000,000
n=1 PB(i,15%)1=-1,000,000(1+i)+2,300,000
=1,300,000-1,000,000 i
=1,000,000(1.3-i)
Is PB(i,15%)1 > 0 or < 0?
(1) if i < 1.3, PB(i,15%)1 > 0.
In this case, the cash released from the project will grow at MARR,
until it is required in the project.
PB(i,15%)2=1,000,000(1.3-i)(1+0.15)-1,320,000
= 175,000 – 1,150,000i=0 IRR=15.22 %.
Example (cont’d):
(2) if i > 1.3, PB(i,15%)1 < 0.
The firm is still in investment mode.
PB(i,15%)2=1,000,000(1.3-i)(1+i)-1,320,000
=-20,000 + 300,000i – 1,000,000 i2=0
IRR=0.1 or 0.2 < 1.3, which violates i > 1.3.
Example (cont’d):
PB
1000
15 %
0
1 2
15.22 % time
-1000
Example (con’d):
After many trials, IRR=6.13 % (verify this).
Since IRR > MARR, the project is acceptable.
PW(6%)=-1000+3900(P/F,6%,1)-5030(P/F,6%,2)+2145(P/F,6%,3)=3.55 > 0.
PW(i)
0
10 % 30 % 50 % i
Accept Accept
Reject
Reject
2,000 7,000
1
1,000
A1:
A2:
PW(10%)=$ 818
IRR=100% 5,000 PW(10%)=$1,364
IRR=40%
Example (cont’d):
n B1 B2 B2-B1
0 -3,000 -12,000 -9,000
1 1,350 4,200 2,850
2 1,800 6,225 4,425
3 1,500 6,330 4,830
IRR 25% 17.43%
Both B1 and B2 are revenue projects. MARR= 10%.
Both projects are profitable at 10%.
Find IRRB2-B1.
At MARR ≥ 25%,
neither project
is acceptable.