The document discusses different types of legislations including their application, effect, and scope. It also outlines the typical parts of legislations such as the title, preamble, enacting clause, body, and provisions. Key cases are summarized that discuss tests of legislative sufficiency and the distinction between civil and common law systems.
The document discusses different types of legislations including their application, effect, and scope. It also outlines the typical parts of legislations such as the title, preamble, enacting clause, body, and provisions. Key cases are summarized that discuss tests of legislative sufficiency and the distinction between civil and common law systems.
Original Description:
powerpoint for legal research, topic on legislations
The document discusses different types of legislations including their application, effect, and scope. It also outlines the typical parts of legislations such as the title, preamble, enacting clause, body, and provisions. Key cases are summarized that discuss tests of legislative sufficiency and the distinction between civil and common law systems.
The document discusses different types of legislations including their application, effect, and scope. It also outlines the typical parts of legislations such as the title, preamble, enacting clause, body, and provisions. Key cases are summarized that discuss tests of legislative sufficiency and the distinction between civil and common law systems.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
LEGISLATIONS
Judge Harold Cesar C. Huliganga, Ll.M.
Types • As to application Prospective – operates after it takes effect Retrospective – affects acts already committed before • As to effect Repealing – revokes or terminates another statute Amendatory – addition to the original law for improvement • As to scope Special – particular persons, entities, things Local – specific, within territorial limits Parts • Title – gives the general statement of the subject matter • Preamble – states the reason for, or the objects of the; does not create nor grant a right, not an essential part (Whereas) • Enacting clause – indicates the authority which promulgates the • Body – contains the subject matter of the statute, the contents Parts • Provisos – acting as a restraint upon, or as a qualification of • Interpretative clause – legislature defines its own language • Repealing clause – announces the legislative intent to • Saving clause – restricts a repealing act • Separability clause – if for any reason, any section or Enactment • TITLE must have only one subject to prevent hodge-podge or log-rolling legislation, to prevent surprise or fraud, and to fairly apprise the people of the subject of legislation • Hodge-Podge – a mischievous legislative practice of embracing in one bill several distinct matters, none of which, perhaps, could singly obtain the assent of the legislator, and then procuring its passage by a combination of the minorities in favor of each of the measure into a majority that will adopt them all. Objective: to unite the legislators who favor any one of the subjects in support of the whole act. VOID Test • The test of sufficiency of the title indicates in broad but CLEAR terms in nature, scope and consequences of the proposed law and its operation • In case of doubt as to the sufficiency of the title, the presumption is in favor of the validity of the acts Lidasan vs. COMELEC FACTS: RA 4790 An Act Creating the Municipality of Dianaton in the Province of Lanao del Sur was signed into law consisting of 21 barrios, 12 of which are from the municipalities of Parang and Buldon, province of Cotabato. The Office of the President recommended the COMELEC to suspend the operation of the statute until clarified. Notwithstanding, the COMELEC declared that the statute should be implemented unless declared unconstitutional by the SC. Hence, the petition for certiorari and prohibition filed by Bara Lidasan, a resident and taxpayer of the detached portion of Parang, Cotabato and qualified voter. Lidasan vs. COMELEC HELD: RA 4790 is unconstitutional because it violates the provision that no bill which may be enacted into law shall embrace more than one subject which shall be expressed in the title thereof. Two-pronged purpose combined in one statute: It creates the municipality of Dianaton purportedly from 21 barrios in the towns of Butig and Balabagan, both in the province of Lanao del Sur; and it also dismembers two municipalities in Cotabato, a province different from Lanao del Sur. People vs. Echavez FACTS: Fiscal Ello filed separate informations against 16 persons charging them with squatting penalized by PD 772. The informations were dismissed on the grounds that (1) entry should be by force, intimidation or threat and not through stealth and strategy as alleged; (2) PD 772 does not apply to the cultivation of a grazing land. People vs. Echavez HELD: The decree does not apply to pasture lands because its preamble shows that it was intended to apply to squatting in urban communities or more particularly to illegal constructions in squatting areas made by well- to-do individuals. The squatting complained of involves pasture lands in rural areas. Aglipay vs. Ruiz FACTS: Bishop Aglipay sought prohibition from the court to prevent the Director of Posts from issuing and selling postage stamps commemorative of the 33rd International Eucharistic Congress which violates the provision that no public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied or used, directly or indirectly, for the benefit or support of any sect, church, denomination or the principle of separation of church and state. Aglipay vs. Ruiz HELD: Petition denied. RA 4052 which appropriates a sum of P60,000.00 for the said stamps contemplates no religious purpose in view. Stamps were not issued and sold for the benefit of the Roman Catholic Church; nor money derived from the sale given to that church. Moreover, what is emphasized is not the Eucharistic Congress itself but Manila as the seat of that Congress. How a bill becomes a law i. Proposal to the committee ii. 1st reading (in session, reading of the title, author, synopsis) iii. Referral to appropriate committee iv. 2nd reading (debate, interpolation, amendment, finalize) v. Endorsement to plenary vi. 3rd reading (Voting viva voce or roll-call, yeas or nays) vii. If there’s a second committee (repeat steps 2-6) How a bill becomes a law • Harmonization of the bill, if necessary: i. Parallel reading between house and senate – bicameral conference committee (3rd house of Congress) ii. Enrolled bill iii. Signed by the Senate President and Speaker of the House iv. Submit to President for approval (approve/veto/lapse into law) Distinction between civil and common law systems • Civil laws are written laws at the time it was crafted while the latter are laws handed down by elders through memory of men, originally unwritten then codified. In the former, judges only interpret the laws because the legislature has the exclusive power of promulgating such; while in the latter, judges may legislate.