Activity Based Costing - APO 9
Activity Based Costing - APO 9
Activity Based Costing - APO 9
Costing -
Dabur
APO GROUP – 9
A B H I N AV G U L A T I – 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 2
M A N A N G U P TA – 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 0
P R AT E E K J A I N – 2 1 0 1 0 3 1 1 7
R A J AT S H A R M A – 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 5 7
Unlike traditional costing methods, this accounting method of costing acknowledges the relationship
between costs, overhead activities, and produced items, attributing indirect costs to products with less
arbitrariness.
However, some indirect costs, such as the salaries of management and office workers, are difficult to
attribute to a product.
2. Divide the processes into cost pools, which contain all of the specific expenses associated with
each activity—for example, manufacturing. Calculate each cost pool's total overhead.
3. Assign cost drivers to each cost pool activity, such as hours or units.
4. Divide the total overhead in each cost pool by the total cost drivers to get the cost driver rate.
5. To get the cost driver rate, divide each cost pool's total overhead by the total cost drivers.
• Consumer care has been the Leading revenue generation segment for Dabur as it accounts to about
60% of the revenue.
• Dabur has 20 state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities across the globe out of which 12 are present in
India, with Baddi being the biggest manufacturing plant.
Types of products
There are 2 types of products which are produced by Dabur. The first one is Standard product
which is produced in large batches. The other one is the custom product which is produced in
comparatively smaller batches.
Dabur India Standard Product Dabur India Custom Product
Annual Sales (units) 12217 11349
Sales Price (per unit) 62 83
Batch Size (units) 1000 50
Direct Labor Time/ per unit 2 2.5
Direct laor rate per hour 8 8
Direct Input Cost per unit 22 32
Number of Custom parts per unit 1 4
Number of Set-ups per batch 1 3
Separate Material per batch 1 1
Using the Overhead Recovery Rate formula, total cost per unit can be computed using the usual
technique by adding together raw material costs, labour costs, and indirect cost allocation.
Selling Price 62 83
Overhead (a) Standard (b) Custom Diver (c) Total Diver (e) Driver Rate (f) Standard Total (g) Custom Total Standard Unit Custom Unit
Cost Driver Diver Volume Volume Volume a+b (d) Costs USD (d/c) Cost a*e Cost b*e Costs Costs
Set Up Costs Set-up per 12.00 720.00 732.00 73307.00 100.15 1201.75 72105.25 0.10 6.35
Batch
Special part Special 12217.00 45396.00 57613.00 60577.00 1.05 12845.52 47731.48 1.05 4.21
handling cost Parts per
unit
Customer Invoices per 50.00 240.00 290.00 28645.00 98.78 4938.79 23706.21 0.40 2.09
invoicing cost year
Material Number of 12.22 226.98 239.20 62616.00 261.78 3198.12 59417.88 0.26 5.24
handling cost Batches
Other Labor 24434.00 28372.50 52806.50 107498.00 2.04 49740.20 57757.80 4.07 5.09
overheads Hours
Direct Costs :
Labor 16 20
Material 22 32
Indirect Costs :
Selling Price 62 83
Under the ABC approach, the profit per unit of a standard product is higher than that of a
personalized product. We can readily infer that ABC is a lot more effective costing strategy for
Dabur India because it prevents unnecessary cost allocation to Standard product by comparing
the Return on Sales numbers under both traditional and ABC techniques. Dabur India should
concentrate on conventional products rather than personalized products because standard
products generate significantly larger sales returns.
Conclusion
By taking the price same, we saw from the ABC method that the return on sales is much
lower in the custom products than the standard products
The cost of producing custom product is higher than the standard but the pricing is kept close
Traditional method is successful for pricing for the companies with low customisability and
need for simplicity
ABC method is time consuming and is costly but is more effective to price the products
correctly
It expands understanding of overheads and cost drivers; and makes exorbitant and non-
esteem adding exercises more apparent
Thank You!