Introduction To Framing Part 2
Introduction To Framing Part 2
Introduction To Framing Part 2
overarching narrative
revenue is being diverted into union coffers. But if you assume that each union member pays between
$500 and $750 annually, taken involuntarily directly from their paychecks, that means the government
union industry in Wisconsin is worth at least $100 million a year.
If government employees want to voluntarily form associations and lobby the government for higher pay,
better benefits, and working conditions, that is their constitutional right. But they have no right to force
all employees to join their organization and take money from their paychecks every week.
Governor Walker’s bill fixes these problems: It affords government workers the right to quit their union a
nd keep their jobs; it requires unions to demonstrate their support through annual secret-ballot votes; and i
t stops state and local governments from collecting union dues through their payroll systems
[16]. These are common-sense measures that would increase worker freedom, restore power to
taxpayers, and make America more competitive internationally. Keep fighting, Governor Walker! The
American people can’t afford you to lose.
THE RIGHTWING NETWORK
http://scholarcitizen.williamcronon.net/2011/03/15/alec/
One key insight you should take from this history is that after the Goldwater defeat in
1964, visionary conservative leaders began to build a series of organizations and
networks designed to promote their values and construct systematic strategies for
sympathetic politicians. Some of these organizations are reasonably well known–for
instance, the Heritage Foundation, founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich, a Racine native and
UW-Madison alumnus who also started the Moral Majority and whose importance to the
movement is almost impossible to overestimate–but many of these groups remain largely
invisible.
The most important group, I’m pretty sure, is the American Legislative Exchange Council
(ALEC), which was founded in 1973 by Henry Hyde, Lou Barnett, and (surprise,
surprise) Paul Weyrich. Its goal for the past forty years has been to draft “model
bills” that conservative legislators can introduce in the 50 states. Its website claims
that in each legislative cycle, its members introduce 1000 pieces of legislation based
on its work, and claims that roughly 18% of these bills are enacted into law. (Among
them was the controversial 2010 anti-immigrant law in Arizona.)
WHY THIS FRAMING IS STATEGIC/MULTI-LAYERED
THE ELEMENTS OF THE ELEVATOR SPEECH
“I believe in …” [followed by two strong progressive
value words for a total of 27 words to be delivered in
9 seconds]
The ES is based on our specific framing of the issue
We take words, ideas and images from the specific
framing of the issue.
The specific framing is ,in turn, based in our master
narrative/framing of our position- our statement of
who we are and what we broadly stand for.
THE MESSAGE/SPECIFIC FRAMING
America promises its people protection for their “life, liberty
and their pursuit of happiness.” This can be an empty
promise for the uninsured, especially children and working
Americans. We are the wealthiest country in the world yet we
rank 44th in infant mortality , 38th in life expectancy and last
in the cost of health care.(See note at end.) We also have the
highest number of uninsured, with Texas standing squarely at
the bottom among the states.
This is NOT acceptable.
THE OVERALL NARRATIVE/BRANDING
Americans are bound together by their adherence to the values laid
down by Our founding fathers and mothers. We are banded together
because together we can create a more perfect union. If we work
together , guided by our thirst for justice, seeking always the common
good , then our story is not ended, but just beginning.
From DFH’s framing of the Healthcare Reform issue….
We face a moment of great peril brought on by” the greed and
irresponsibility of some and the collective failure of us all to make hard
choices about our future.” These are the times that try men’s souls, that
sap their confidence, but we have chosen hope over fear, unity of
purpose over conflict and discord.
Based on Obama’s campaign and inauguration speeches
YOUR FIRST TRY: FRAMING AT HOME
Elevator Speech and First Framing Worksheet
Your task: write an elevator speech in which you “frame” a
topic of your choice. Use the master frames of this lesson or
create your own.
Health care
Financial Reform
School Finance
The Budget/Deficit
Unionism
Uses and limits of the elevator speech
THE POLITICAL BRAIN – NEXT TIME
The view of democracy that naturally flows from the dispassionate view of the mind is of a marketplace of ideas.
Parties and politicians who want to convince others of their point of view lay out the data, make their best
case, and leave it to the electorate to weigh the arguments and exercise their capacity to reason. To the
Western ear, and particularly to the American ear, this view of mind and politics seems eminently “reasonable.”
But this view of mind and brain couldn’t be further from the truth. In politics, when reason and emotion
collide, emotion invariably wins. Although the marketplace of ideas is a great place to shop for policies, the
marketplace that matters most in American politics is the marketplace of emotions. Republicans have a keen
eye for markets, and they have a near-monopoly in the marketplace of emotions. They have kept government off
our backs, torn down that wall, saved the flag, left no child behind, protected life, kept our marriages sacred,
restored integrity to the Oval Office, spread democracy to the Middle East, and fought an unrelenting war on
terror. The Democrats, in contrast, have continued to place their stock in the marketplace of ideas. And in so
doing, they have been trading in the wrong futures. I have it on good authority (i.e., off the record) that
leading conservatives have chortled with joy (usually accompanied by astonishment) as they watched their
Democratic counterparts campaign by reciting their best facts and figures, as if they were trying to prevail
in a high school debate tournament. They must have heaved a huge sigh of relief (but not on the air) when Al
Gore ran for president pretending that he had not co-presided over one of the most prosperous periods in modern
American history.
Westen, Drew (2008). The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation (pp. 35-36).
PublicAffairs. Kindle Edition.