Analytical Design Method Vs FEA

Electric Machine Design Course
Analytical design method vs. FEA analysis method

Lecture # 7
Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 1

Classical electrical machine design
Analytical machine design formulas developed over the years have been
used electric machine design.
The success of this design method has been validated and improved by
calibration adjustments from actual machine testing.
Certain parameters causing accuracy difficulties have been addressed by

famous engineers who developed approximation solution methods based
upon test results.
Examples: Equivalent Circuit (Alger & Speed methods)

(Plus others) End winding leakage reactance (Alger, Richter & Postnikov)
Leakage reactance saturation (Norman)
Deep Bar effects (Boldea)
Magnet circuit flux densities assumed to be uniform in each cross section

using classical analytical methods. Does not account for path length.
Using classical analytical equations requires leakage flux or armature

reactance flux linkage reduction values be estimated or measured.
Analytical calculations using classic field equations
Analytical methods using classic magnetic field equations for calculating the
magnetic flux magnitude and distribution within the magnetic circuit can only
be estimated. Leakage and the effects in changes in material permeability due
to flux densities can not be accounted for using classic field equations.
However these design methods are very useful because they are fast and re-
iterative solutions can be rapid. This process is used for initial designs and
sizing of machines. Over the years charts of typical data for average current
densities & average circuit flux densities are available to speed up this process.
Expert designers have developed and validated special solution methods as
mentioned earlier.
These classic field equations are also used with all FEA solvers for post
processing the field distribution results to accurately predict current densities,
inductances, torque output, losses, efficiencies as well as thermal conditions.
Using these FEA results, the magnetic circuit can be refined.

Using FEA simulations methods
Finite element analysis of magnetic circuits greatly enhances the study of the
flux distribution by dividing the circuit up into smaller pieces including the
surrounding air into very small bits such as triangles for 2D analysis and
pyramids for 3D analysis. The magnetic field equations are solved for each of
these bits (called mesh) of the motor and iterated until the level of change
from iteration to iteration has become very small. All the correct material
properties of the materials in the mesh must be used in the field equation
solutions to achieve accurate results.
By solving the field equations for each bit rather than the major circuit
components such as the yokes, the teeth, the magnets, the coils, (and
usually ignoring the fame and shaft parts), the open circuit air gap flux
distribution can be accurately studied including the flux leakage details as
a function of phase current (for both motoring & generating).
Summary: According to Prof. Duane Hanselman, “ FEA analysis is not a

practical tool to be used exclusively for the design of electric machines but
moreover to confirm or improve a machine design”. I agree with him.
Two very efficient design simulation tool choices are called MOTORSOLVE or SPEED

Simple electro-magnetic circuit
Small amount of
As
NI required to A lot of NI
magnetize steel required to
portions magnetize
air-gap
(Function of L)
G (air-gap)
N (turns)
Ag
Certain NI
produces Each steel
certain flux, section has
cross section certain cross
determines flux section area
L
density
(Length of path)
ϕ Magnetic flux

Simple flux density calculations
of a simple magnetic circuit
Flux density in Tesla for each part of the circuit where the cross section
changes can be simply be calculated by dividing that circuit cross
section, (sections A1, A2, A3, A4, & A5 from the diagram) by the total air
gap flux.
This is based upon: ϕ Magnetic flux = B times cross section area
The source of magnetic flux is either from a magnet in the circuit or
from the NI from phase coils
The features of this simple

circuit are easily converted
to a circuit cross section of
most electric machines.
The same circuit calculations

are applicable.

Analytical calculations methods
Such simple circuit calculations can be sufficiently accurate for many
machine calculations, but not always..
Works fine as long as the flux leakage is not excessive

Works fine as long as there is only minimal or no saturation
Works fine if magnetic circuit can be defined in X-Y plane
Works fine if testing of a prototype is practical (perhaps risky)
Analytical calculation methods have been used for about 75 years for
electric machine design with perhaps hundreds of millions machines
operating successful without the use of FEA analysis.
The number of machine types and electric power sources were

limited for most of those 75 years. Now with electronic
inverters/controllers and new machine configurations, FEA analysis is
required for a final design performance prediction before fabrication.

FEA flux distribution of IPM machine
Note the complex magnetic circuit of the PRIUS traction machine below
High saturation
Distorted flux circuit sections
distribution
Tapered
teeth
IPM machines can be initially sized with analytical methods but FEA must be used
Cogging torques
Cogging torques or open circuit shaft torques are associated with PM
machines only. (Not to be confused with torque ripple under load).
Can be estimated by analytical methods and useful for relative
analysis for comparing slot pole combinations and pole angles
For precise calculations in order to achieve extremely low cogging

torques FEA analysis must be used.
FEA analysis is required to evaluate the effects of cogging torques at

very low speeds on torque ripple at low currents or torque levels.
Example: the cogging torque cannot exceed the running torque
Note: when motoring or generating power at speeds any cogging

torque nearly cancel so the expected loss is nearly zero ???

Unusual copper loss calculations
Current densities in phase coils are usually easily handled by electric
machine analytics.
FEA methods are necessary when the current density is not uniform.
Equal sharing of parallel strands or parallel circuits.
High frequency causes of current concentrations in certain
conductors or on certain portions of individual conductors.
Proximity effects & Litz wire requirements
FEA methods are necessary top predict eddy current losses in phase
conductors
FEA analysis can be used to study circulating currents
FEA analysis can be utilized to study the effects of fault situations

IM rotor bar faults & shorts in stator phase coils

Rotor loss analysis
IM (AC Induction) aluminum, copper or wound rotors.
Cage analysis for proximity effects and transient currents.
Rotor leakage reactance studies.
Rotor tooth flux saturation at peak torques.
RSM (Reluctance Synchronous) rotor design.

D axis and Q axis inductance measurements vs. current.
Flux barriers vs. flux carriers determine the power factor,
so the design is critical and FEA is absolute necessity.
PMSM (All variations of PM brushless machines) for rotor design

De-magnetizing currents as function of temperature
PM rotor losses from eddy currents
Core back iron
Retention sleeves
Magnets themselves

Inductance calculations
Direct axis and quadrature axis inductance calculations can be

estimated using classical electric machine analytics.
Circuit saturation resulting for phase currents reduce the

accuracy and complicates their control circuit design without
actual measurements .
The use of FEA analysis allow the prediction of these important

inductance calculations for both IPM PMSM machines as well as
AC IM, SR and RSM machines.

Thermal predictions of electric machines
Until about one decade ago very little was available in the literature much
less any technical books on the thermal analysis of electrical machines.
(The technology of this topic was kept secret by suppliers)
Fortunately for us all Dave Staton of the UK has changed this for all time.
He has published may articles on this topic and also offers an analytical
thermal solver product that utilizes a lumped parameter model with motor
templates. This product filled a significant thermal analysis gap.
Recently Infolytica has introduced a 3D FEA thermal simulation tool for

IM, SR, RSM and PMSM electric machines.
The lumped parameter method offers somewhat faster solution times but
the 3D FEA thermal solver offers the potential of more accuracy

Motor & drive system behavior modeling
Using FEA field simulations linked to control simulation tools such

as MATLAB/Simulink, PSpice & PSIM and real-time simulation
tools like OPAL-RT & D-Space, complex control circuits can be
developed to predict motor behavior for different applications.
Without proactive FEA links of the actual motor field simulation

details to the above mentioned control simulation tools, high
performance machines would be very difficult to design using
traditional analytical methods (if not impossible).

FEA Pre-Processor used for cross section layout

IM Current distribution @ no-load

IM Peak torque FEA flux distribution

Flux distribution Toyota Prius peak Torque

Torque vs speed plot PMSM

Back EMF with & without rotor skew
(8) Pole SPM brushless PMSM batch file FEA solution

FEA pre-processor used for selecting balanced phase windings as function of
slots & poles

Winding layouts using FEA pre-processor

Title

Analytical Design Method Vs FEA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analytical Design Method Vs FEA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analytical Design Method Vs FEA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Electric Machine Design Course

Analytical design method vs. FEA analysis method

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 1

Certain parameters causing accuracy difficulties have been addressed by

Examples: Equivalent Circuit (Alger & Speed methods)

Magnet circuit flux densities assumed to be uniform in each cross section

Using classical analytical equations requires leakage flux or armature

Using these FEA results, the magnetic circuit can be refined.

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 3

Summary: According to Prof. Duane Hanselman, “ FEA analysis is not a

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 4

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 5

The features of this simple

The same circuit calculations

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 6

Works fine as long as the flux leakage is not excessive

The number of machine types and electric power sources were

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 7

For precise calculations in order to achieve extremely low cogging

FEA analysis is required to evaluate the effects of cogging torques at

Note: when motoring or generating power at speeds any cogging

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 9

FEA analysis can be used to study circulating currents

FEA analysis can be utilized to study the effects of fault situations

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 10

RSM (Reluctance Synchronous) rotor design.

PMSM (All variations of PM brushless machines) for rotor design

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 11

Direct axis and quadrature axis inductance calculations can be

Circuit saturation resulting for phase currents reduce the

The use of FEA analysis allow the prediction of these important

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 12

Recently Infolytica has introduced a 3D FEA thermal simulation tool for

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 13

Using FEA field simulations linked to control simulation tools such

Without proactive FEA links of the actual motor field simulation

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 14

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 15

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 16

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 18

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 19

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 20

(8) Pole SPM brushless PMSM batch file FEA solution

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 21

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 22

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 23

Mod 7 Copyright: JR Hendershot 2012 24

You might also like