Topic 4: Mental Accounting
Topic 4: Mental Accounting
Topic 4: Mental Accounting
Mental Accounting
Definition – Thaler (1985)
Mental accounting is the set of cognitive operations used by individuals and
households to code, categorize and evaluate financial activities.
Hedonic-Editing Hypothesis
(1) segregate gains (because the gain function is concave due to diminishing
marginal sensitivity).
(2) integrate losses (because the loss function is convex, due to diminishing
marginal sensitivity).
(3) integrate or cancel smaller losses with larger gains (to offset loss-aversion), and
(4) segregate small gains from larger losses (the utility of a small gain can exceed
the utility of slightly reducing a large loss, again due to diminishing marginal
sensitivity).
A Few Concepts
• Cancellation
• Silver lining
• Acquisition utility
• Transaction utility
Transaction Utility Experiment
• You are lying on the beach on a hot day. All you have to drink is ice water.
For the last hour you have been thinking about how much you would enjoy
a nice cold bottle of your favorite brand of beer. A companion gets up to go
make a phone call and offers to bring back a beer from the only nearby
place where beer is sold (a fancy resort hotel) [a small, rundown grocery
store]. He says that the beer might be expensive so asks how much you are
willing to pay for the beer. He says he will buy the beer if it costs as much or
less than what you state. But if it costs more than the price you state, he will
not buy it. You trust your friend, and there is no possibility of bargaining
with the (bartender) [store owner]. What price will you tell him?
• The median answers, adjusted for inflation, were $7.25 and $4.10.
Components of Mental Accounting Process
Thaler’s papers refer to three components of the mental accounting
process:
• Why?
• Expectations
• Reference point
• Denomination effect
• Time frame
• Wealth budgeting
Time Periods in Mental Accounting
• Sunk cost & sunk cost fallacy
• Sunk cost & opportunity cost - how long does the memory of a past purchase linger?
Suppose you bought a case of good Bordeaux in the futures market for $20 a bottle. The
wine now sells at auction for about $75. You have decided to drink a bottle. Which of the
following best captures your feeling of the cost to you of drinking the bottle? (The
percentage of people choosing each option is shown in brackets.)
(a) $0. I already paid for it. [30%]
(b) $20, what I paid for it. [18%]
(c) $20 plus interest. [7%]
(d) $75, what I could get if I sold the bottle. [20%]
(e) –$55. I get to drink a bottle that is worth $75 that I only paid $20 for so I save money by
drinking this bottle. [25%]
Sunk Cost & Opportunity Cost
Suppose you buy a case of Bordeaux futures at $400 a case. The wine will retail at
about $500 a case when it is shipped. You do not intend to start drinking this wine for a
decade. At the time that you acquire this wine which statement more accurately
captures your feelings? Indicate your response by circling a number on each of the
scales provided. 1: strongly agree; 5: strongly disagree
(a) I feel like I just spent $400, much as I would feel if I spent $400 on a weekend
getaway.
1 ---- 2 ---- 3 ---- 4 ---- 5 Mean: 3.31
(b) I feel like I made a $400 investment which I will gradually consume after a period of
years.
1 ---- 2 ---- 3 ---- 4 ---- 5 Mean: 1.94
(c) I feel like I just saved $100, the difference between what the futures cost and what
the wine will sell for when delivered.
1 ---- 2 ---- 3 ---- 4 ---- 5 Mean: 2.88
Where PT is Silent
• Break even effect
74%
26%
61%
39%
77%
23%
References
• Wilkinson, N. and Kleas, M. An Introduction to Behavioral Economics,
Palgrave McMillan, ch 6
• Marketers
• Sales promotion
• Extra product promotion
• Price off promotion
• Premium promotion
• Disaggregated pricing
• Trade-in pricing