Ethical Dilemmas in Picu: May Chehab, MD, FRCP (Lon), FRCP (Edin), ABIP
Ethical Dilemmas in Picu: May Chehab, MD, FRCP (Lon), FRCP (Edin), ABIP
Ethical Dilemmas in Picu: May Chehab, MD, FRCP (Lon), FRCP (Edin), ABIP
Medical judgments
Professional clashes
Ethical battlefield
ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN PICU
Healthcare team
Children
Parents
Economic, cultural, religious, and legal differences, as well as personal
attitudes, play a role in ethical dilemmas in PICU
m ic Pe
no rso
Eco al na
Le g l att
i tud
es
r a l
t u
Cul
ou s
li gi
Re
a l d i l em ma s
Ethic
Ethics concerns doing the “right thing” when faced with a choice
MEDICAL ETHICS
1-Autonomy
2-Beneficence
3-Nonmaleficence
4-Justice
MEDICAL ETHICS
AUTONOMY PATERNALISM
BENEFICIENCE NONMALEFICIENCE
Justice/Rationing
Resources allocation
ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN PICU
DNR orders
Withdrawal/withholding of Life Supporting Therapy (LST)
Nutrition at end of life
Futility
Family-centered care
Resources allocation
Clinical research
Telemedicine
Teaching trainees
Behavioral issues and attitudes
DNR ORDERS
WITHDRAWAL/WITHHOLDING OF LST
NUTRITION AT END OF LIFE
FUTILITY
PERMANENT COMMITTEE FOR RESEARCH AND FATWA, SAUDI ARABIA ISSUED FATWA (DECREE) NO.12086 ON 28/3/1409 (1989)
DNR
Treatment of a patient can be terminated if a team of medical
experts consider that treatment is futile
Seeking Remedy
Islamic Jurisprudence
Each child should be “given the opportunity to participate in decisions affecting his or her
care, according to age, understanding, capacity, and parental support”
Children capable of safely eating and drinking who show signs of wanting to eat or drink
should be provided food and fluids
In Islam, nutritional support is considered basic care and not medical treatment; hence, it
is a duty to feed people who are no longer capable of feeding themselves
Islamic law, therefore, does not allow withholding or withdrawal of basic nutrition because
this would lead to death by starvation, which is a crime in Islamic teachings
ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN PICU
WITHDRAWAL/WITHHOLDING OF LIFE-SUSTAINING THERAPY (LST)
Europe and Brazil: Less than 50% of overall unit death rate
Varying clinical practices, different attitudes, cultural backgrounds and
changes in practice over time
Intensivists more reluctant to withdraw than to withhold LST particularly
for some religious beliefs
DO PHYSICIANS DISTINGUISH BETWEEN WITHHOLDING AND
WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUSTAINING THERAPY?
50% of intensivists found withdrawal more psychologically and ethically
problematic than withholding LST
Religious physician found withdrawal more ethically problematic than
withholding LST but not more difficult psychologically
End-of-life discussions between physicians, patients, families should include
Advance directives
Patient’s religious and spiritual beliefs
The potential quality of life after discharge
Nurses feel left out in decision making as they are not always involved in multidisciplinary end-of-
life discussions
Nurses understand that the intensivist decision to withdraw
Nurses and junior doctors experience impatience and desire for decisions
Widely accepted around the world on medical, legal and ethical grounds
End-of-life decisions should be based on team discussions
Reduce subjective elements to a minimum
Provide input from all members of the ICU team
Importance of consensus as a symbol of the team’s strength
Family should be approached and facts discussed fully with them
Quality of life
ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING END-OF-LIFE CARE
An ethical duty to
keep the child informed in age-appropriate ways
Solicit child's assent when appropriate, to undergo the proposed
treatment
‘BEST INTERESTS’ IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE: AN EMPIRICAL ETHICS STUDY
ARCH DIS CHILD 2017;102:930–935
Legal and professional guidance states that parents and clinicians should
share ‘best interests’ decisions
Fear that presence of parents might inhibit open discussion among staff
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE
HOSPITAL PEDIATRICS VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, FEBRUARY 2017
The ethical principle is that all patients have the right to have
family members present and that the patients’ family members
should have the opportunity to be present during resuscitation of a
relative
RESOURCES ALLOCATION
ETHICS OF INTENSIVE CARE RESOURCES ALLOCATION
Ethics dictates that resources be allocated where there are more likely to have impact
What to Do When There Aren’t Enough Beds in PICU?
BEDSIDE
RATIONING
Utilitarian ethics
Duty Ethics Utilitarian Ethics
Duration of benefit
Urgency of treatment
Amount of resources required for successful treatment
CLINICAL RESEARCH
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Conducting research in PICU is challenging but remains essential
Subject selection
Respect for subjects
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Minimal risk has been defined as a level of harm or discomfort that is not
greater than those risks that a child may encounter in daily life
ETHICS OF DRUG RESEARCH IN THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE
CARE UNIT
PEDIATR DRUGS (2015) 17:43–53
Beneficience Justice
Not harmful to patient
Virtual ICU coverage when no ICU
Tele-ICUs is a welcome addition
coverage is available during off hours
Non-maleficience
Layer of insulation between treating
doctor and patient
Patient transforms into a name and sets of
data on computer screen
TEACHING TRAINEES
Training physicians should not compromise optimal patient care
Computer-based learning
New educational modalities in
most training programs Simulation
Teach conceptual and technical
fundamentals
Closely supervised, controlled patient experiences
Verbal abuse
Major sources of
Behavior-related conflicts Personal animosity
conflicts
Mistrust
Communication gaps
Disrespect
Suicide rate among male doctors is 40% higher than among males in
general
Suicide rate among female doctors is 130% higher than among women in
general
MORAL DISTRESS
Organizational influences
Legislation
Stressful environment
Advances in technology
Futile treatment
Poor communication
Inadequate resources
Hierarchies of decision-making
ETHICAL
DILEMMS
MORAL
DISTRESS
‘‘Thetask of medicine is to cure sometimes, to relieve often, and to comfort
always.’’
16th-century French surgeon Ambroise Pare
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and
what is right to do.
Potter Stewart, American judge, 1915–1985