Lecture 3 Introducing Organisations
Lecture 3 Introducing Organisations
ORGANISATIONAL
BEHAVIOUR
3:
Introducing
Organisations
LAST TIME – FIND ON
TEAMS/MOODLE
• MODULE OVERVIEW/INTRODUCTION/HANDBOOK
• OB THEORY HELPS US UNDERSTAND MANAGEMENT
• DIFFERENT APPROACHES OVER TIME – TAYLORISM ETC
• FRAMEWORK FOR COMPARISONS
• HELPS US ANALYSE AND IDENTIFY PROBLEMS
• HELPS MANAGERS CHOOSE APPROPRIATE SOLUTIONS
• THEORIES COME AND GO – CLASSICS ENDURE
• GIVE US A A WAY OF LOOKING AT SOMETHING
• BECAUSE WE WANT MANAGERS AND ORGANISATIONS
TO BE MORE SUCCESSFUL
PRE-WORK DISCUSSION
1. To explain what an
organisation
is and how it is designed
– operating component
(workers)
– administrative component
(managers)
ACTIVITY 1: WHAT DO THEY ALL DO?
• Operational Core
Carrying out daily tasks e.g. a teacher teaching
• Operational Support
Indirect daily tasks e.g. Stores, maintenance
• Organisational Support
Whole organisation services e.g. HR, catering, office
• Top management
Broad objectives/policy, Strategy, Overview,
External relations e.g. Chief Executive
• Middle management
Co-ordination, integration, links other layers
e.g. Department or functional Head
SOME WAYS OF CLASSIFYING ORGANISATIONS
• Public/Private/Not-for-Profit
• Formal/Informal
• Product/Service
PRIVATE AND Private enterprise Public sector
PUBLIC SECTOR
• Owned and financed by • Created by
ORGANISATION individuals, partners or government and
shareholders financed through
S accountable to their taxation, accountable
owners or members. to the electorate.
• Main aim is of a
commercial nature such
• Do not generally have
as profit, return on
profit as their goal but
capital employed,
have a political or
market standing or sales
levels. welfare purpose.
SEVEN ASPECTS OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR
‘The old distinctions between private public and not-for-profit sectors have
been blurred as charities have taken on an ever-increasing role in the
delivery of services. Tough competition for funds and growing public
scrutiny have led many charities to adopt practices once more commonly
associated with the commercial sector’.
Arnott
PRODUCTION AND SERVICE ORGANISATIONS
Production
Service Organisations
Organisations
• Concerned with
• Concerned with tangible intangible services.
goods. • Services cannot be
• Goods can be stored for stored.
future use. • Services are consumed
• Goods remain with the at the moment of
customer. delivery.
WAYS OF CLASSIFYING ORGANISATIONS
• Public/Private/Not-for-Profit
• Formal/Informal
• Product/Service
• By major purpose
CLASSIFICATION BY MAJOR PURPOSE
• Economic/Business • Political
• Protective • Educational
• Social/Associative • Protective/Military
• Public service • Voluntary/Charity
• Religious
Examples?
Many organisations are ‘multi-purpose’, with more than
one goal
Often possible to identify a single main goal.
SOCIAL ENTERPRISE ORGANISATIONS
• Set up in response to
social or environmental
concerns
COMMON • People
FEATURES OF • Objectives
ORGANISATIONS • Structure.
• Public/Private/Not-for-Profit
• Formal/Informal
• Product/Service
• By major purpose
• By prime beneficiary
SO WHO BENEFITS FROM THE
ORGANISATION?
• Businesses – owners
Issue: maximising efficiency and profits
• Public/Private/Not-for-Profit
• Formal/Informal
• Product/Service
• By major purpose
• By prime beneficiary
• By primary activity
CLASSIFICATION BY PRIMARY ACTIVITY
The ‘first order’ function of the organisation
determines the classification:
• Productive or Economic
– Concerned with wealth creation, public service
• Maintenance
– Concerned with socialisation of people
• Adaptive
– Concerned with research and the pursuit of knowledge,
theory testing
• Managerial or political
– Concerned with social order, control
Katz & Khan (1978)
...THEN BY SECONDARY ACTIVITY
Object or People
Are they moulding
organisations?
People process or
If people, do people change?
they:
WAYS OF CLASSIFYING ORGANISATIONS
• By legal status/ownership:
Public/Private/Not-for-Profit
• Formal/Informal
• Product/Service
• By major purpose
• By prime beneficiary
• By primary activity
AUTHORITY IN ORGANISATIONS (WEBER)
• Traditional organisations
– Authority derived from custom and tradition
– The ‘right to rule’
e.g. Pope/King
• Charismatic organisations
– Authority derived from belief in the personal qualities of the leader
e.g. Churchill, Jobs, Branson?
• Bureaucratic organisations
– Authority derives from the acceptance of rules
– ‘Legal-rational’ authority based on position
e.g. Army, Govt ministers, Vice Chancellor
SEES THE
ORGANISATION AS A
Open Systems ‘SYSTEM’
Approach
Inputs
Outputs
• Social groups/cliques
• Informal/unwritten rules: ‘how we do things
around here’
• Informal communication: the ‘grapevine
• faster but often less accurate
• Co-exists with formal structure
• Can be beneficial and negative
• Managerially challenging
PEOPLE AND
ORGANISATIONS HAVE A
RELATIONSHIP
‘People modify the working of the formal organisation, but their
behaviour is also influenced by it. It may make demands on them,
which they find an undue strain so that they seek ways of modifying
these pressures.
Stewart
ORGANISATIONS OF THE FUTURE
‘The essence of organisations has shifted and will
continue to shift from focusing on structure to
capability.
Capability represents what the organisation is able
to do and how it does it rather than the more
visible picture of who reports to whom and which
rules govern work….
Organisations will operate in the future to identify
and nurture a handful of critical capabilities.’
Ulric
h
Figure 2.4 Areas of social responsibility for organisations Rollinson (2008)
TODAY’S OBJECTIVES
1. To explain what an
organisation is and how it is
designed
2. To distinguish between the
different types
3. To look further at the
‘open systems’ model
4. To explain the ‘informal
organisation’
5. To consider the future shape
of organisations