Unit-2 Law
Unit-2 Law
Unit-2 Law
Documents
Memorandum of association
• A Memorandum of Association (MOA) represents the
charter of the company. It is a legal document
prepared during the formation and registration
process of a company to define its relationship with
shareholders and it specifies the objectives for which
the company has been formed.
• The company can undertake only those activities that
are mentioned in the Memorandum of Association. As
such, the MOA lays down the boundary beyond which
the actions of the company cannot go.
• MOA must be signed by at least 2 subscribers in case
of a private limited company, and 7 members in case
of a public limited company.
• Memorandum of Association helps the
shareholders, creditors and any other person
dealing with the company to know the basic
rights and powers of the company.
• Also, the contents of the MOA help the
prospective shareholders in taking the right
decision while thinking of investing in the
company.
Format of Memorandum of Association
Case- In Eley vs Positive Govt. Life Assurance Co. Ltd., the articles of
a company provided that E should be the solicitor of the company for
life and could be removed from office only for misconduct. E took
office and became a shareholder. But after sometime the company
dismissed him. E sued the company for damages for breach of
contract. It was held that the articles did not constitute any contract
between the company and the outsider and as such he had no cause
of action.
Distinction between articles of association and
memorandum of association
Memorandum of Association Articles of Association
1. It is character of company indicating nature of They are the regulation for the internal management
business & capital. It also defines the company’s of the company and are subsidiary to the
relationship with outside world memorandum.
2. It defines the scope of the activities of the They are the rules for carrying out the objects of the
company, or the area beyond which the actions of company as set out in the Memorandum.
the company cannot go.
3. It, being the charter of the company, is the They are subordinate to the Memorandum.
supreme document
4. Any act of the company which is ultra vires the Any act of the company which is ultra vires the
Memorandum is wholly void and cannot be ratified articles can be confirmed by the shareholders if it is
even by the whole body of shareholders. intra vires the memorandum.
5. Every company must have its own memorandum. A company limited by Shares need not have Articles
of its own. In such A case, Table A Applies.
6. There are strict restrictions on its alteration. They can be altered by a special resolution, to any
Some of the conditions of incorporation contained extent, provided they do not conflict with the
in it cannot be altered except with the sanction of Memorandum and the Companies Act.
the Central Government.
Moa Aoa
Doctrine of Ultra Vires
• The term “Ultra” means beyond and “Vires” means powers.
The term, therefore, means the doing of an act, which is
beyond the legal power, and authority of the company. It is
considered as an act outside the scope of the object of the
company.
• The Memorandum, being the constitution of the company
sets out the principal objectives, powers, scope and its area
of operation, both internal and external. A company,
therefore, can do anything within the scope of the powers
specified in the Memorandum.
• It has also an implied power to do all such things that are
fairly incidental to its main objects. If the company does
anything which is beyond the powers specified in the
Memorandum it shall be construed as an Ultra Vires act.
Why the Doctrine?
• The objective of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires is to
ensure the shareholders and the creditors that the
fund and assets of the company will not be used for
any purpose other than those specified in the
Memorandum.
• Especially the creditors, while dealing with the
company can make themselves aware of the fact
whether his transaction with the company is ultra
vires or not. If it is found ultra vires, he can avoid
such transaction and thereby safeguard his interest.
• An act, legal in itself, but not authorized by the object
clause of the Memorandum of Association of a
company or statute, is Ultra Vires the company. Hence,
it is null and void.
• An act ultra vires the company cannot be ratified even
by the unanimous consent of all shareholders.
• If an act is ultra vires the directors of a company, but
intra vires the company itself, then the members of the
company can pass a resolution to ratify it.
• If an act is Ultra Vires the Articles of Association of a
company, then the same can be ratified by a special
resolution at a general meeting.
Effect of Ultra Vires Acts
As stated, an ultra vires act is considered void ab initio. The
doctrine has the following effects in the given situations:
1. Personal Liability of Directors: It is the duty of the
Directors to see that the investors’ money is utilized for the
purposes laid down in the memorandum. On failure of the
duty, resulting in money being used for other objects they
can be sued personally without making the company a
party, and be made liable for compensation. If the ultra
vires act is proved to be deliberate or mala fide, criminal
action may also be brought.
2. Contracts Void: Any contract which is ultra-vires the
company, will be void and of no effect whatsoever. “An ultra
vires contract being void ab initio cannot become intra vires
by reason of estoppel, lapse of time, ratification, or delay”.
However, if the contract is only ultra-vires the powers of the
directors but not ultra-vires the company, it may ratify such a
contract in the general meeting and thereby be bound by it.
3. Injunction: Any member of the company can bring injunction
against the company to restrain it from doing ultra-vires acts.
4. Ultra-vires Acquisition of Property: When money of a
company is spent ultra vires in acquiring a property, the right of
the company over that property would be secure. This is because
the property represents corporate capital, though acquired
wrongly.
• However, where the payment for an ultra vires acquired
property/asset has not been made, the vendor can obtain a
tracing order to recover the property from the hands of the
company. A company cannot be allowed to benefit from such
transactions at the cost of the other party.
5. Ultra vires lending- A person borrowing
money from the company under a contract
which is ultra vires, can be sued by the company
to recover the amount so lent.
6. Ultra vires torts- A company cannot be made
liable for torts committed by its officers in
connection with a business which is entirely
outside its objects. It can be made liable in torts
only if these are committed in the course of
intra vires activities by its servants or officers
within the course of their employment.
Doctrine of Constructive Notice
• Section 399 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that any person
may, after payment of the prescribed fees:
- Inspect by electronic means any documents kept with the
registrar.
- Require a copy of any document including certificate of
incorporation.
• In line with this provision, the Memorandum of Association and
the Articles of Association are public documents once filed with
the registrar. Any person may inspect the same after payment
of the fees prescribed.
• The doctrine presumes that every person has knowledge of the
contents of the Memorandum of Association, Articles of
Association and every other document such as special
resolutions.
• The special resolutions are required to be
registered with the Registrar under the
Companies Act, 2013.Thus, if any person
enters into a contract, which is inconsistent
with the company’s Memorandum and Article,
he shall not acquire any rights against the
company and shall bear the consequences
himself.
• This doctrine protects the company from
outsiders.
Doctrine of indoor management
• Various principles in the corporate world help to ensure the safety of
stakeholders. The doctrine of indoor management is exactly the
opposite of the doctrine of constructive notice. It provides some
protection to the outsiders against the company as it softened the
hardships that are faced by the outsiders while dealing with the
company.
• According to Turquand’s rule which is also known as the doctrine of
indoor management, it is not the responsibility of the person who is
dealing with the company to enquire those internal proceedings
related to the contract are followed if such person is satisfied that the
transaction he/she enters into is in accordance with the
memorandum and articles of association. This doctrine states that
the people who are dealing with the company to presume that the
internal proceedings are according to the document which is
submitted to the Registrar.
Origin of doctrine of indoor management
• From Royal British Bank vs. Turquand, the doctrine of indoor
management was originated. In this case, there was a
provision in the articles of association which states that the
borrowing of money can be done on bonds and for this, a
special resolution needs to be passed in a general meeting.
• The company said that they are not bound to pay the
money as no such resolution was passed in a general
meeting. But it was held that the company is bound to pay
back the money as the plaintiffs have a right to infer that a
resolution was passed related to this in a general meeting as
directors could borrow subjected to the resolution.
Exceptions to the Doctrine of indoor
management
Following are the exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management:
1. Knowledge of irregularity: if the person who is dealing with the
company has knowledge about the fact that there is a lack of
authority of the person who is acting on behalf of the company. The
outsider is well known about the irregularity so this doctrine will not
apply in this case.
Case- In Howard V Patent Ivory Manufacturing Company , the
Articles of the company empowered the directors to borrow up to
1,000 pounds. The limit could be raised provided consent was given
in the General Meeting. Without the resolution being passed, the
directors took 3,500 pounds from one of the directors who took
debentures. Held, the company was liable only to the extent of
1,000 pounds. Since the directors knew the resolution was not
passed, they could not claim protection under the Turquand’s rule.
2 Forgery: Transactions involving forgery are void ab
initio since it is not the case of absence of free consent;
it is a situation of no consent at all. This has been
established in the Ruben V Great Fingall Consolidated
case. The facts of the case –
A person was issued a share certificate with a common
seal of the company. The signature of two directors and
the secretary was required for a valid certificate. The
secretary signed the certificate in his name and also
forged the signatures of the two directors. The holder
contented that he was not aware of the forgery, and he
is not required to look into it. The Court held that the
company is not liable for forgery done by its officers.
3. Negligence: if the person dealing with the company
behaves negligently then, in that case, this doctrine will
not apply. Thus when an officer does something which
he should not have done it and the person dealing with
such officer rely on him rather than making proper
enquiries then the person cannot take the help of the
doctrine of indoor management.
Case- In the case of Anand Bihari Lal V Dinshaw & Co,
the plaintiff accepted a transfer of property from the
accountant. The Court held that the plaintiff should
have acquired a copy of the Power of Attorney to
confirm the authority of the accountant. Thus, the
transfer was considered void.
Prospectus
• The promoters of a public company will have to take steps
to raise the necessary capital for the company, after having
obtained the Certificate of Incorporation. A public company
may invite the public to subscribe to its shares or
debentures. Prospectus are to be issued for this purpose. To
issue a prospectus is very essential for a public company.
• If the promoters of the company are confident of raising the
required capital privately from their friend or relatives, they
need not issue a prospectus. In such a case, a statement in
lieu of prospectus must be filed with the Registrar.
• A private company is not allowed to issue a prospectus since
it cannot invite the general public to subscribe to its shares
and debentures.
Define prospectus
• Section 2(36) defines a prospectus an “any document described
as issued as a prospectus and includes any notice, circular,
advertisement or other document inviting deposits from the
public or inviting orders from the public for the subscription or
purchase of any share in, or debentures of, a body corporate”.
• In simple words, a prospectus may be defined as an invitation
to the public to subscribe to a company’s shares or debentures.
By virtue of the Amendment Act of 1974, any document inviting
deposits from the public shall also come within the definition of
prospectus. The word “Prospectus” means a document which
invites deposits from the public or invites offers from the public
to buy shares or debentures of the company. A document will
be treated as a prospectus only when it invites offers from a
public.
OBJECTS OF PROSPECTUS
The main objects of a prospectus are as follows:
1. To bring to the notice of public that a new
company has been formed.
2. To preserve an authentic record of the terms of
allotment on which the public have been invited to
but its shares or debentures.
3. To secure that the directors of the company
accept responsibility of the statement in the
prospectus
CONTENTS OF PROSPECTUS
• Registered company office address.
• Company secretary, auditors, bankers, underwriters, etc., their respective names and
address.
• Opening and closing dates of the issue.
• Allotment letters and refunds declaration within the prescribed time.
• A statement by the board of directors about the separate bank account where all monies
received out of shares issued are to be transferred.
• Underwriting of the issue their details.
• Directors, auditors, bankers Consent to the issue, expert’s opinion if any.
• The authority for the issue and the details of the resolution passed thereof.
• Procedure and time schedule for allotment and issue of securities.
• The Capital structure of the company with a comprehensive outlook.
• Main objects and location of the present business of the company.
• Public offer and terms of the present issue and its objective.
• Minimum subscription, amount payable by way of premium, issue of shares otherwise than
on cash.
• Appointment and remuneration details of the director
• Sources of promoter’s contribution.
• Declaration that all the provisions of companies act have been complied with.
Types of prospectus
• Red Herring Prospectus
• Shelf Prospectus
• Abridged prospectus
• Deemed Prospectus
Red Herring Prospectus:
• It is the offer document which contains all the details about the offer of
securities. However it does not include quantum of issue and the price of
securities.
• Furthermore, it is not the final prospectus as Company can update it several
times before the final issue.
• Issuer company needs to file it with Registrar at least 3 days prior to the
opening of offer.
• It is named in such a way because it contains a para in Red ink. That states
that Company is not attempting to sell the shares before approval of SEBI.
• A red herring prospectus shall carry the same obligations as are applicable to
a prospectus and any variation between the red herring prospectus and a
prospectus shall thus highlighted as variations in the prospectus.
• Upon the closing of the offer of securities, the final prospectus stating therein
the total capital raised, whether by way of debt or share capital, and the
closing price of the securities and any other details as not included in the red
herring prospectus shall then filed with the Registrar and the Securities and
Exchange Board.
Shelf Prospectus
• Company can issue more than one issue from the single document which
we call Shelf Prospectus.
• Furthermore, banks and financial institutions usually issue it.
• In this case once the company files it with ROC, there is no need to file
fresh prospectus at every issue.
• However it has the validity of up to one year.
• A company filing a shelf prospectus shall be required to file an information
memorandum containing all material facts relating to new charges created,
changes in the financial position of the company as have occurred between
the first offer of securities or the previous offer of securities and the
succeeding offer of securities and such other changes as may be
prescribed, with the Registrar within the prescribed time, prior to the issue
of a second or subsequent offer of securities under the shelf prospectus.
• Where an information memorandum then filed, every time an offer of
securities is made, such memorandum together with the shelf prospectus
shall constitute the prospectus.
Abridged Prospectus
• Abridged Prospectus is the actual summary of a prospectus. It contains
all the salient features of a prospectus. The original prospectus that a
company files to the exchange regulator is too large. Reading the entire
prospectus may be too much time consuming for an investor. Instead,
they go through the abridged prospectus, which gives them the basic
idea about the company.
• The abridged prospectus contains all the important and materialistic
information. No company will issue the share buying from without the
abridged prospectus attached to it so that investors can take a well-
informed decision.
• A copy of the prospectus shall, on a request being made by any person
before the closing of the subscription list and the offer, be furnished to
him.
• If a company makes any default in complying with the above provisions,
it shall be liable with a penalty of fifty thousand rupees for each default.
Deemed Prospectus
• It is a document which the company issues in case of offer for sale of
securities to the public.
• Moreover this document is an invitation to public to purchase the shares of
company through an intermediary such as Issuing House.
• Section 64(1) provides that where a company allots or agrees to allot any
shares or debentures with a view to these being offered for sale to the
public, any document by which the offer of sale to the public is made, shall
for all purposes be deemed to be a prospectus issued by the company.
• Further, an allotment of, or an agreement to allot, shares or debentures
shall be deemed to have been made with a view to the shares or
debentures being offered for sale to the public, if it is shown;
(i) That the offer of the shares or debentures for sale to the public was made
within six months after the allotment or agreement to allot;
(ii)That at the date when the offer was made, the whole consideration to be
received by the company in respect of the shares or debentures had not
been received by it.
Mis-statement in Prospectus
• A prospectus is an invitation to the public to subscribe to the
shares or debentures of a company. Every person authorizing
the issue of prospectus has a primary responsibility to ensure
that the prospectus contains the true state of affairs of the
company and does not give any fraudulent picture to the public.
• People invest in the company on the basis of the information
published in the prospectus. They have to be safeguarded
against all wrongs or false statements in prospectus. Prospectus
must give a full, accurate and a fair picture of material facts
without concealing or omitting any relevant fact.
• The statements which do not qualify to the particulars
mentioned in the prospectus or any information is intentionally
and willfully concealed by the directors of the company, would
be considered as misstatement.
Remedies for Mis-statement in Prospectus