This document discusses different types of moral dilemmas. It defines a moral dilemma as a situation where a moral agent must choose between two or more conflicting options that are both morally unacceptable. The document outlines four main types of moral dilemmas: 1) epistemic and ontological dilemmas where there is a lack of knowledge or conflict between moral requirements, 2) self-imposed vs. world-imposed dilemmas caused by one's own actions or external events, 3) obligation vs. prohibition dilemmas involving choosing between two wrong options, and 4) single-agent vs. multi-person dilemmas that involve one or multiple moral agents. It also discusses moral dilemmas at the systemic, organizational, and individual levels.
This document discusses different types of moral dilemmas. It defines a moral dilemma as a situation where a moral agent must choose between two or more conflicting options that are both morally unacceptable. The document outlines four main types of moral dilemmas: 1) epistemic and ontological dilemmas where there is a lack of knowledge or conflict between moral requirements, 2) self-imposed vs. world-imposed dilemmas caused by one's own actions or external events, 3) obligation vs. prohibition dilemmas involving choosing between two wrong options, and 4) single-agent vs. multi-person dilemmas that involve one or multiple moral agents. It also discusses moral dilemmas at the systemic, organizational, and individual levels.
This document discusses different types of moral dilemmas. It defines a moral dilemma as a situation where a moral agent must choose between two or more conflicting options that are both morally unacceptable. The document outlines four main types of moral dilemmas: 1) epistemic and ontological dilemmas where there is a lack of knowledge or conflict between moral requirements, 2) self-imposed vs. world-imposed dilemmas caused by one's own actions or external events, 3) obligation vs. prohibition dilemmas involving choosing between two wrong options, and 4) single-agent vs. multi-person dilemmas that involve one or multiple moral agents. It also discusses moral dilemmas at the systemic, organizational, and individual levels.
This document discusses different types of moral dilemmas. It defines a moral dilemma as a situation where a moral agent must choose between two or more conflicting options that are both morally unacceptable. The document outlines four main types of moral dilemmas: 1) epistemic and ontological dilemmas where there is a lack of knowledge or conflict between moral requirements, 2) self-imposed vs. world-imposed dilemmas caused by one's own actions or external events, 3) obligation vs. prohibition dilemmas involving choosing between two wrong options, and 4) single-agent vs. multi-person dilemmas that involve one or multiple moral agents. It also discusses moral dilemmas at the systemic, organizational, and individual levels.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16
MORAL DILEMMAS
ETHICS (BSBA 1B)
LECTURE NO. 3 WHAT ARE MORAL DILEMMAS?
These are situations where persons, who are
called, “moral agents” in ethics, are forced to choose between two or more conflicting options, neither of which resolves the situation in a morally acceptable manner. TYPES OF MORAL DILEMMAS 1. EPISTEMIC AND ONTOLOGICAL DILEMMAS EPISTEMIC MORAL DILEMMA There are two or more moral requirements that conflict with each other. The moral agent hardly knows which one takes precedence over the other. One option must be better than the other; only it needs fuller knowledge of the situation. 1. EPISTEMIC AND ONTOLOGICAL DILEMMAS ONTOLOGICAL MORAL DILEMMA There are two or more moral requirements that conflict with each other, yet neither of these conflicting moral requirements override each other. Neither of the moral requirements is stronger than the other; hence, the moral agent can hardly choose between the conflicting moral requirements. 2. SELF-IMPOSED AND WORLD-IMPOSED DILEMMA SELF-IMPOSED DILEMMA A self-imposed dilemma is a situation that has been caused by the individual’s mistakes or misconduct. The moral dilemma is self-inflicted. This can cause a number of complications when attempting to make a decision. 2. SELF-IMPOSED AND WORLD-IMPOSED DILEMMA WORLD-IMPOSED DILEMMA A world-imposed dilemma is a situation where events that we can’t control have created an unavoidable moral conflict. An individual must resolve a moral dilemma, even though the cause of it is beyond his/her control. For example, this could be in times of war or a financial crash. 3. OBLIGATION DILEMMAS AND PROHIBITION DILEMMAS Prohibition dilemmas are the opposite of obligation dilemmas. The choices that are offered to us are all, on some level, morally reprehensible. They can all be considered as wrong, but we must choose one. They could be illegal, or just plain immoral. An individual must choose between what would normally be considered as prohibited. 4. SINGLE-AGENT AND MULTI PERSON DILEMMAS SINGLE-AGENT MORAL DILEMMA The agent “ought, all things considered, to do A, ought all things considered, to do B, and she cannot do both A and B”. 4. SINGLE-AGENT AND MULTI PERSON DILEMMAS MULTI-PERSON MORAL DILEMMA One agent, P1, ought to do A, a second agent, P2, ought to do B, and though each agent can do what he ought to do, it is not possible both for P1 to do A and P2 to do B”. It requires more than choosing what is right; it also entails that the persons involved reached a general consensus. TYPES OF MORAL DILEMMAS A. SYSTEMIC (MACRO-LEVEL)
Ethical Standards are universal or general;
ethical standards apply to all who are within the system (Example: R.A 6713 “Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees) B. ORGANIZATIONAL (COMPANY LEVEL)
At a company or corporate level, ethical standards
are embedded in the policies and procedures of the organization; ethical standards apply to all those within the organization (Example: code of Ethics for Professional Teachers) C. INDIVIDUAL (INDIVIDUAL LEVEL)
Ethical Standards of individuals; individuals may
well have a different set of ethical standards from their employer (organization) and this can lead to tensions. ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU!