Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Ca3 Therapeutic Modality Grp.3

    Uploaded by

    Valjim Pacatang
    This document describes and compares four models of treatment collaboration: 1. Separate parallel treatment has no communication between practitioners, risking over-treatment. 2. Informed parallel treatment has practitioners know other treatments but no coordinated plan, limiting over-treatment risk but coordination. 3. Team-based treatment has practitioners coordinate a combined treatment plan evaluated and adjusted over time, benefiting patients but requiring resources. 4. Interdisciplinary treatment has practitioners synthesize treatments customized for each patient's needs and goals, ideally lowest overtreatment risk but very high resource use.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ca3 Therapeutic Modality Grp.3

    Uploaded by

    Valjim Pacatang
    43 views15 pages
    This document describes and compares four models of treatment collaboration: 1. Separate parallel treatment has no communication between practitioners, risking over-treatment. 2. Informed parallel treatment has practitioners know other treatments but no coordinated plan, limiting over-treatment risk but coordination. 3. Team-based treatment has practitioners coordinate a combined treatment plan evaluated and adjusted over time, benefiting patients but requiring resources. 4. Interdisciplinary treatment has practitioners synthesize treatments customized for each patient's needs and goals, ideally lowest overtreatment risk but very high resource use.

    Original Title

    Ca3 Therapeutic Modality Grp.3 Ppt (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document describes and compares four models of treatment collaboration: 1. Separate parallel treatment has no communication between practitioners, risking over-treatment. 2. Informed parallel treatment has practitioners know other treatments but no coordinated plan, limiting over-treatment risk but coordination. 3. Team-based treatment has practitioners coordinate a combined treatment plan evaluated and adjusted over time, benefiting patients but requiring resources. 4. Interdisciplinary treatment has practitioners synthesize treatments customized for each patient's needs and goals, ideally lowest overtreatment risk but very high resource use.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    43 views15 pages

    Ca3 Therapeutic Modality Grp.3

    Uploaded by

    Valjim Pacatang
    This document describes and compares four models of treatment collaboration: 1. Separate parallel treatment has no communication between practitioners, risking over-treatment. 2. Informed parallel treatment has practitioners know other treatments but no coordinated plan, limiting over-treatment risk but coordination. 3. Team-based treatment has practitioners coordinate a combined treatment plan evaluated and adjusted over time, benefiting patients but requiring resources. 4. Interdisciplinary treatment has practitioners synthesize treatments customized for each patient's needs and goals, ideally lowest overtreatment risk but very high resource use.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 15

    Advantages And

    Disadvantages Of The
    Different Treatment Model
    Type of
    collaboration (FEATURES)

    A) Separate parallel Treatment- Patient treatment is


    provided by practitioners who do not communicate with
    other practitioners about the course of treatment and do not
    have any knowledge of each other’s treatment models.

    TAMANO
    ADVANTAGES
    No resources expended on coordination. Patients are
    completely autonomous with regard to individual
    practitioners and free to choose or reject treatments without
    these choices having any notable influence on treatment
    collaboration

    PUGONG
    DISADVANTAGES
    Practitioners do not have the knowledge to consider the
    strengths and weakness of the other treatments the patient is
    receiving. Therefore there are no considerations about the
    extent to which treatments promote or inhibit (or even
    directly counteract) each other. Risk of over-treatment.

    PARTOL
    B) Informed parallel treatment- Patient treatment is
    provided by practitioners who have acquired knowledge
    about each other’s treatment models. This knowledge is
    either acquired before the alternative practitioners begin
    their treatments or once treatments have started. Treatments
    are thus informed by each other to some degree, but there is
    no combined treatment plan, as treatments are provided in
    parallel by isolated’ practitioners.

    PACATANG
    ADVANTAGES
    Limited use of resources. Patients find practitioners
    knowledgeable about other treatments received. This in turn
    produces a more qualified dialogue between each
    practitioner and the patient about the treatments.

    SUSON
    DISADVANTAGES
    Practitioners can relate to only a limited extent to the
    strengths and weakness of the other treatments the patient is
    receiving. Treatments are given in parallel so there is
    limited coordination, as well as the risk of over-treatment
    (although a smaller risk than for A).

    TEVES
    TREATMENT
    C) Team-based treatment - Based on knowledge of each
    other’s treatment models and acquired knowledge about
    which treatments can promote or impede others, a treatment
    plan is drawn up in cooperation with the patient focusing on
    the patient’s needs and goals. The combined treatment plan
    (which treatments, how many, how often and in what order)
    is evaluated and adjusted underway

    VILLEGAS
    ADVANTAGES
    Patients meet a team of practitioners who work together
    with each other and the patient to plan the course of
    treatment. The patient receives a treatment combination that
    is evaluated as optimal for the individual. Patients are better
    safeguarded against over-treatment because efforts are
    coordinated and followed up underway

    TABO-TABO
    DISADVANTAGES
    Considerable resources needed for on-going conference
    participation/team meetings: In the beginning in order to
    refer the patient to the right combination of treatments, and
    subsequently to evaluate the course of treatments and
    possibly change referrals

    TORRES
    D) Interdisciplinary treatment team- Based on in-depth knowledge
    of each other’s treatment models and acquired knowledge on
    which elements from different treatments can promote or impede others,
    a synthesis of treatments is generated with regard to the needs and goals of
    the individual patient. In other words, a new treatment is developed, one that
    contains elements from the treatment models of the participating
    practitioners. A combined treatment plan is drawn up indicating how
    treatment will be carried out, and the plan is evaluated and adjusted underway

    OGABANG
    ADVANTAGES
    Patients receive a combined treatment that is specially
    developed to match their individual needs and goals. Ideally
    patients face the lowest possible risk for overtreatment.

    NERI
    DISADVANTAGES

    Very high resource consumption in order for the


    practitioners to be in good rapport, to meet sufficiently
    often to ‘design’ individualized treatments and to evaluate
    the course of treatments for the individual.

    SINGSON
    THANK YOU!

    You might also like