1 Exercises Product Quatity Control Geometrical Tolerancing
1 Exercises Product Quatity Control Geometrical Tolerancing
1 Exercises Product Quatity Control Geometrical Tolerancing
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCING
EXERCISES
COURSE: QUALITY MANAGEMENT EMT0060
• Geometrical tolerancing
• Feature Control Frame
• Maximum Material Condition (MMC)
• Regardless of Feature Size (RFS)
• Regardless of Feature Size (RFS)
• Perpendicularity gauging measurement method example
• True Position –Location of a Feature
• Geometrical tolerancing, problems to solve, homework
• Standards geometrical tolerancing
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
The third and following compartments of a feature control frame contain the datum
feature reference(s) if they are required. For example, if a form tolerance, such as
flatness or straightness, is specified, then no datum feature reference is allowed.
However, if a location tolerance like position is specified, the datum feature
references are usually specified.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
Feature Control Frame
The alphabetical order of the datum references has no significance—the significance is their order of
precedence, reading from left to right as primary, secondary, and tertiary. The primary is the first feature
contacted (minimum contact at 3 points), the secondary feature is the second feature contacted (minimum
contact at 2 points), and the tertiary is the third feature contacted (minimum contact at 1 point). Contacting
the three (3) datum features simultaneously establishes the three (3) mutually perpendicular datum planes
or the DRF. The DRF is created by so-called Datum Simulators which are the manufacturing, processing, and
inspection equipment, such as surface plate, a collet, a three jaw chuck, a gage pin, etc.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
In certain situations, the datum feature modifiers Maximum Material Boundary (MMB)
or Least Material Boundary (LMB) may be applied to the datum feature. The default
modifier is Regardless of Material Boundary (RMB). Since the datum feature has size
(it can get larger and smaller), information is necessary on the size condition of the
datum feature to which the datum feature reference applies. The modified condition
of the datum feature (MMB, LMB, RMB) defines the size or condition of the datum
feature simulator.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
Callout
In each of these cases, the part will have the maximum amount of material that
would be allowed within the part tolerances.
Max Material Condition is one of the dimensional limits on a part. The other side of
the tolerance range would be the Least Material Condition.
The only GD&T Symbols where Max Material Condition can be applied are:
Straightness (axis)
Parallelism
Perpendicularity
Angularity
True Position – very common
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
The Go-Gauge for a hole or internal feature would exist of a pin that is just a tiny bit
(few microns) smaller than the Maximum Material Condition of the hole. The gauge
pin would then be inserted into the hole and as long as the pin Goes into the hole,
the part is in spec.
(Note: The pin gauge may be made slightly smaller (a few microns) than the MMC to
account for any straightness or tolerance issues that may be inherent in producing
the gauge)
Final Notes:
Features of Size:
Maximum Material Condition is one of three features of size callouts in GD&T. The
other two are Least Material Condition and Regardless of Feature Size. All of these
specify the condition that the part or feature must be in to apply the specified
geometric tolerance.
Default to Regardless of feature size
When there is not call out to Maximum Material Condition or Least Material Condition,
the part, by default, is measured regardless of feature size (RFS). This means there
is no bonus tolerance and the envelope of the part is not defined. The part must be
controlled geometrically regardless of what size the feature is at.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
Reason for Use Regardless of Feature Size (RFS):
Since Regardless of feature size is the default condition it is used always and ignored only when specified. It
is applied for most part conditions. RFS is always kept where balance is critical and where both sides of the
tolerance must be maintained independently of the GD&T callouts.
Regardless of Feature size requires the axis to be measured separately from the size of the hole and cannot
be gauged easily. However, there is no bonus tolerance allowed in this condition so the perpendicularity
would be much better controlled regardless of the size of the hole.
In the following example, no material modifiers are called out, RFS would be implied and the control for the
parts would be like this:
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
Reason for Use Regardless of Feature Size (RFS):
This of course makes sense and follows the normal rules of GD&T. However if you were to add a
Max Material Condition to the drawing, the hole limits are quite different. If you were to control
perpendicularity of an axis with MMC, you could control and gauge the part according to Example
from perpendicularity.
There is now a bonus tolerance that is added to the perpendicularity tolerance to make it larger.
With Regardless of feature size this could not happen, as the perpendicularity would have to be the
same, regardless of the features size.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCES
Reason for Use Regardless of Feature Size (RFS):
Axis control can also be called out for Perpendicularity and is one of the more common forms of axes call
outs. When it is referenced for a circular feature, the feature control frame will contain the diameter (Ø)
symbol. Axis Perpendicularity can be applied to a positive feature (pin/boss) or to a negative feature (a
hole). When Perpendicularity is referenced for axial control of a feature, the symbol now specifies a
cylindrical boundary where the axis of the referenced feature must lie. This cylindrical boundary is formed by
taking a line that is directly perpendicular to the datum feature. When this version of Perpendicularity is
called out it is to be used with maximum material condition (MMC) to enable easy gauging of the part. See
example below for how these particular parts are gauged.
Axis:
A cylinder surrounding a referenced theoretical axis
which is directly perpendicular to the datum feature.
The tolerance zone is the diameter of this symbol in
which the central axis of the measured feature must
lie.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE
Perpendicularity gauging measurement method example
Axis:
To ensure that a part or feature is axially perpendicular, Maximum material condition is most often
called out on axis perpendicularity to allow easy measurement with a gauge. This allows it to be
designed for either a negative (hole) or positive (pin) feature and can take into account a bonus
tolerance.*
Gauge size for an internal feature (like a hole): *Note on Bonus Tolerance:
When a functional gauge is used for
Gauge Ø (pin gauge)= Min Ø of hole (MMC) – Perpendicularity Tolerance Perpendicularity, any difference the
actual feature size is from the
Gauge size for an external feature (like a pin): maximum material condition would
be a bonus tolerance. The goal of a
Gauge Ø (hole gauge) = Max Ø of pin (MMC) + Perpendicularity Tolerance maximum material condition callout
is to ensure that when the part is in
its worst tolerances, the
orientation and size of the hole/pin
will always assemble together. This
means that if you make a pin
smaller, you make more bonus
tolerance for yourself. This bonus
can be added to the GD&T tolerance
and would widen the
perpendicularity tolerance.
Bonus Tolerance = Difference
between MMC & Actual condition
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE
NB!
Adding this bonus tolerance to
your perpendicularity means
your “gauged” perpendicularity
tolerance can go up to 0.4 when
the part is at its largest
diameter.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE
Gauging / Measurement:
True Position –Location of a Feature
True position of a feature is made by first determining the current referenced point and then
comparing that to any datum surfaces to determine how far off this true center the feature
is. It is simplified like a dimensional tolerance but can be applied to a diameter tolerance
zone instead of simple X-Y coordinates. This is done on a CMM or other measurement
devices.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE
Locations of the gauge pins or holes are given on the drawing as basic dimensions. All gauge
features should be located in the datum true positions, but sized according to the formulas
above.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE
Relation to Other GD&T Symbols:
True Position –Location of a feature
True position is closely related to symmetry and concentricity as they both require the
location of features to be controlled. However, True position is more versatile since it can be
called on a feature of size or combined with other geometric tolerances to specify an entire
part envelope.
An example of the use of profile tolerancing for an additively manufactured part (ASME Y14.46-2017,
Product Definition for Additive Manufacturing, The Americal Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York,
NY, 2017)
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCE. IMPLEMENTATION IN DATA EXCHANGE STANDARDS
Supply chains in
manufacturing industry
depend on standardized data,
such as STEP, to exchange
complete product information.
Major CAD vendors have
implemented and tested
dimensional and geometrical
tolerancing specifications that
are currently used in industry
(CAx Implementor Forum.
www.cax-if.org). Figure on
the rigth shows an example of
a test case in which a 3D
model with geometrical
tolerancing information is
represented in a neutral STEP
format for exchange. But
similar support of new ISO
GPS tolerancing standards
must await the native CAD
implementations of these new
standards.
GEOMETRICAL TOLERANCING. DATUM
STANDARDS
GD&T (geometrical dimensioning and tolerancing) is defined and controlled by standards to provide
uniformity and clarity on a global scale. One widely utilized standard is published by the American Society
of Mechanical Engineers as ASME Y14.5–2009 Dimensioning and Tolerancing. It is part of the broader set of
ASME Y14 standards that cover all aspects of engineering drawings and terminology. The International
Organization of Standards (ISO) also publishes a series of standards that have been more commonly used in
European countries. The two standards have developed in parallel and are mostly similar in concept and
terminology. The ASME standard tends to put more emphasis on design intent while the ISO standards
have a greater emphasis on metrology, or the measurement of the resulting part. According to the ASME
approach, the parts are defined primarily in a way to ensure that they will perform the desired function,
without specifying what equipment or processes should be used to manufacture or inspect the parts. The
ASME Y14.5–2009 standard is utilized in this textbook.
[www]
1. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/perpendicularity/
2. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/maximum-material-condition/
3. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/true-position/
4. https://www.fictiv.com/articles/gdt-101-an-introduction-to-geometric-dimensioning-and-tolerancing
5. Edward P. Morse, Craig M. Shakarji, Vijay Srinivasan. A Brief Analysis of Recent ISO Tolerancing
Standards and Their Potential Impact on Digitization of Manufacturing. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-
review under responsibility of the Scientific Committee of the 15th CIRP Conference on Computer
Aided Tolerancing - CIRP CAT 2018.
Available from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327445529_A_Brief_Analysis_of_Recent_ISO_Tolerancing_
Standards_and_Their_Potential_Impact_on_Digitization_of_Manufacturing
[accessed Nov 21 2020].
6. https://www.industrial-electronics.com/engineering-industrial/fund-tool_9.html
TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL
Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Tel 620 2002 (E-R 8.30–17.00)
taltech.ee