Session 5 - Upload
Session 5 - Upload
Session 5 - Upload
Management
SESSION 5
S H I VA N E E P E T H E
Inventory Management
Ralph Lauren: Inventory Cuts
In 2016 Ralph Lauren appointed a new chief executive – Stefan Larsson. Stefan’s first task?
Cut costs in inventory and warehouse management. That meant a ‘refocus’ on the brand’s best-
selling labels, cutting it’s different layers of management and closing stores.
The result of such dramatic changes? Profits plummeted 50 percent in the two years to follow.
The brand had an inventory lead time of fifteen months which kicked up several issues. Firstly,
the company couldn’t be responsible when it came to being reactive with trends. Secondly,
holding on to so much excess stock was expensive. Third, Ralph Lauren’s inventory grew by 26%
over three years, but sales only grew by 7%.
The end result? Lots of discounted stock, lots of promotions, and a desperate need to shift shock
Marks & Spencer’s : Failure to Stock
Marks & Spencer’s admitted failure to stock enough clothes in popular sizes during autumn of
2019.
They called it a “challenging period” for their clothing and homeware business.
After-sales falling 2.1% in the space of a few months the brand quickly released this inventory
oversight was costing them almost £5 million.
As well as poor availability of stock, the brand also admitted to too much stock and markdown
on their clothing line.
Kinds of Inventory
Cycle Inventory: Fulfil regular sales
Safety Stock: Inventory to avoid losing sales during lead time
Seasonal/Anticipatory Inventory: In hopes of surge
WIP Inventory: Stock of unfinished goods
Pipeline Inventory: Product “in transit”
Shelf Inventory: Inventory as an “ad”
Questions to Ask
What should be the order quantity?
Model Assumptions:
◦ Demand is known, certain and constant over time
◦ Lead time is constant and known
◦ Entire order quantity is received at the end of the lead time
◦ No shortages allowed
◦ Infinite planning horizon
EOQ Model
Annual demand is
Holding cost or inventory carrying cost is per unit
Ordering cost is per order
Safety Stock
Continuous Review Policy
Demand for the period (week/month/year etc) is
We denote as a tabulated value value of the standard normal distribution
Lead time is time periods
Holding cost is per unit per unit time
Probability of stockout during a cycle is
◦ Safety stock =
◦ Safety stock =
Periodic Review Policy: Assumptions
Infinite planning horizon
Daily demand is random, probabilistic and continuous
Inventory level is reviewed after certain time. I order at the beginning of every review period.
If an order is placed, it arrives after the specified lead time
Lead time is constant and known
If a customer order arrives when there is no inventory, the order is lost
There is a specified service level (the probability of not stocking out during lead time)
◦ This can be interpret as the knowing the proportion of times we may tolerate a stockout
Periodic Review Policy
R R R
Periodic Review Policy
Assuming same parameter notations as in Continuous Review Policy, except which denotes the
order upto level in periodic review
We calculate the safety stock and order upto quantities for the period Review time +Lead time
Find the safety stock, order upto level and the amount ordered at the time of the third review.
Periodic Review Policy: Solution
A Hint Table
Continuous Review Periodic Review