Group 5 Assessmemt Report
Group 5 Assessmemt Report
Group 5 Assessmemt Report
Prepared
by:
Group 5
Development Angela L.
of Classroom Pogoso
Assessment Madel
Montanez
Tools Freddie
Villas
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS IN
WRITING THE TEST ITEMS
•
• The stem may be in a question or in an incomplete
statement. The options include the correct answer
which is called the key and several plausible wrong
options, which are called the distracters, whose
function is to distract students from the correct
answer.
•
Multiple-choice items are preferable to use
than other type of items because of the
following reasons:
Example:
BAD:
A table of specifications
a. specifies the weaknesses of student performance
b. indicates hoe learning can be improved
c. adequately samples the behavior to be tested*
d. reduces the amount of time to construct the items
BETTER:
Why is table of specifications primarily important before
writing any test?
a. It indicates how learning can be improved.
b. It specifies the weakness of student performance.
c. It adequately samples the behavior to be tested.*
d. It reduces the amount of time to construct the items.
2. State the stem in simple, clear language.
The stem should be written in simple language devoid of any difficult word. The sentence structure
must be in simple form. Complex sentence structure should be avoided. Any unnecessary word/s and
irrelevant details in the stem must be eliminated.
Example:
BAD:
To measure adequately the learning outcome that is to get
the main idea of a selection without giving chance to
ambiguity, the best type of item to use is
a. Short answer item
b. Completion item
c. Multiple-choice item*
d. Matching item
The stem is wordy and contains a difficult word (ambiguity), unless the
word is introduced and explained during instruction. The stem needs that to be
shortened to make it concise and clear in defining the problem.
BETTER:
To measure clearly and precisely the skill of getting the
main idea of a selection, the best type of item to use is
a. Short-answer
b. Completion
c. Matching
d. Multiple-choice*
3. Make the stem longer than the options.
The stem should adequately cover enough details to make it clear and precise. It is common error
to load the options with too many details so that the alternatives become longer than the
stem. The options should be shorter than the stem. In other words, the stem should be longer than
the options.
Example:
BAD:
Objectives are useful when
a. Course content is clearly specified.
b. Student performance is precisely delineated.
c. Teacher behavior is definitely demonstrated.
d. Learning activities are made congruent and observable.
The options are too wordy. Brevity and clarity of expression must be
observed in writing an item. To shorten the options, the stem should contain
enough details to make it clear and definite.
BETTER:
Objectives are useful in test construction when they are stated in the point of view of the
a. teacher
b. student*
c. course
d. activity
4. Stress the negative word used in the stem.
There are instances that the use of a negative
word is important in measuring a particular
learning outcome.
Example:
POOR:
True False*
The true-false item as seen by
Newton takes little time to prepare.
BETTER:
True* False The true-false item takes little time to
prepare.
• The “poor” example is marked false because Newton is a scientist not an
expert on test construction. The falsity of statement is based on a minor
detail not on the major idea, which is takes little time to prepare
• The “better” item focuses on a major idea. The main idea which is takes
little to prepare should be judged true or false.
2. Each statement should be short and simple.
The item becomes clear when the statement is short and
is expressed in a simple sentence.
Example:
POOR:
T*
F
True-false items provide for adequate sampling objectives
and can be scored rapidly.
BETTER:
T*
F
True-false items provide for adequate sampling of
objectives.
T*
F
True-false items can be scored rapidly.
Example:
POOR:
T
F*
True-false items are seldom prone to
guessing.
BETTER:
T*
F
True-false items are prone to guessing.
• The qualifier “seldom” makes the “poor” example a
false item. When “seldom” is deleted, the item
becomes true.
4. Negative statements should be used sparingly.
If such statements cannot be avoided, emphasize the
negative word used by underlining it or capitalizing all the
letters in that word. This practice will preclude negative
statements to be read as positive ones.
Example:
POOR:
T
F*
True-false items are NOT prone to guessing.
BETTER:
T
F*
5. Double negatives should be avoided.
Double negatives can be interpreted as affirmative.
However, they may be understood as emphasized negative.
Double negatives tend to make statements ambiguous.
Example:
POOR:
T
F
True-false items cannot be scored by an untrained person.
BETTER:
T
F*
True-false items CANNOT be scored by a trained person.
The “poor” example uses double negatives. To improve this item,
delete
• one of the negative words and use capital letters to show
emphasis.
6. Statements of opinions or facts should be
attributed to some important person
or organization.
Example:
POOR:
T
F
Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of
death.
BETTER:
T*
F
The Department of Health reported that
pneumonia is one of the leading causes of
death.
7. The number of true and false statements
should be equal whenever possible.
Example:
POOR:
1. True 2. True 3. False 4. True 5. True 6. False
BETTER:
1. False 2. True 3. True 4. False 5. True 6. False