Trademark: - Meaning - Purpose - Criteria For Registration/refusal - Registration
Trademark: - Meaning - Purpose - Criteria For Registration/refusal - Registration
Trademark: - Meaning - Purpose - Criteria For Registration/refusal - Registration
- Meaning
- Purpose
- Criteria for registration/refusal
- Registration
What is a trademark?
• Comprise two words “trade” and “mark”
1 st Sou
nd
• Trademark: mark used in trade In India mark regd.
:Y
trade m ahoo Inc’s
ark “yo
del”
Purpose/ function of TM
• Identifies & differentiate
• Signifies source
•
• Provides assurance
• advertises
Need for TM protection
• Prevent injury
Trade Marks Act, 1999
• “goods” – s.2(1)(j)
• “service’ – s.2(1)(z)
Types of ‘Marks’
The Act of 1999 recognises three kinds of marks:
Note: ‘Service mark’ is sometimes considered the fourth type of mark, but in practice
it/s subsumed/overlapped by TM.
• Certification mark
It’s a species/kind of TM. But unlike a regular TM, it does not signify trade origin.
It indicate that goods have been certified by proprietor (of certification Mark) to
be of certain characteristics – in respect of origin, material, mode of
manufacture of goods or performance of services, quality,accuracy or other
characteristics
Eg. Proprietor of ISI mark is BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards),
Other eg. : Agmark (agricultural products), Woolmark
Agmark Woolmark
Collective mark
- Another type of TM
- Association of persons is the proprietor of TM.
ICAI
• The definition of TM is for both registered and unregistered marks.
• Regn. under the Act gives exclusive right to TM owner to use the mark and
prohibit others from using it.
• In case of infringement of TM, the owner must prove “use” of TM (by the
accused party) as per the law/Act.
Unregistered TM
• Protected outside the statutory framework (‘Passing off’ action)
• Need abundant evidence to show product (g/s) is quite distinct from product of
the accused
• Prove that accused passed of his product as product of the aggrieved (TM
Meaning of “use” of TM
As per sec.29(6) person uses a registered mark, if, in particular, he—
(b) offers or exposes goods for sale, puts them on the market, or stocks
them for those purposes under the registered trade mark, or offers or
supplies services under the registered trade mark;
• (b) which consist exclusively of marks or indications which may serve in trade
to designate the kind,, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical
origin or the time of production of the goods or rendering of the service or
other characteristics of the goods or service;
• Inherent distinctiveness
Eg. In case of invented word (Google, Kodak, Savalon, Dettol, Swiggy, Zepto, BlinkIt), non-
descriptive words
• Acquired distinctiveness
Common words of language are public property and no monopoly can be allowed over
such words
Eg. “Rasoi” for hydrogenated groundnut oil [Hindustan Development Corp.(1955) Cal]
Court rejected the mark on following grounds:
- it is a common word of language – s.9(1)(c)
- To the general public the word "Rasol" means cooking and the normal
use of hydrogenated groundnut oil is for cooking purpose. Thus, word "Rasoi"
would imply a direct reference to the character of the goods, thus, violates
s.9(1)(b).
Provided that a trade mark shall not be refused registration if before the date
of application for registration it has acquired a distinctive character as a result
of the use made of it or is a well-known trade [Explanation to s.9(1)]
Absolute Grounds for refusal : s.9(2)
A mark shall not be registered as a trade mark if—
• (a) it is of such nature as to deceive the public or cause confusion;
• (d) its use is prohibited under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of
Improper Use) Act, 1950
Absolute Grounds for refusal : s.9(3) shape
• A mark shall not be registered as a trade mark if it consists exclusively
of—
• (a) the shape of goods which results from the nature of the goods
themselves; or
• (b) the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result;
or
• (c) the shape which gives substantial value to the goods
Relative Grounds (s.11)
• Main thrust of the provision is to avoid any conflict with any pre-
existing mark
rival marks are identical and the goods/services covered by them are
also identical;
rival marks are identical, but goods/services covered by them are not
identical but similar,
rival marks are not identical but similar and the goods/services covered
by them are either identical or similar.
Similar goods
Examples:
Rationale:-