Organizational behavior (OB) is the study of how individuals and groups act within organizations. It examines human behavior in work settings to gain an understanding of performance. OB draws from psychology, sociology, and social psychology to study individuals, groups, and organizational structure and their impact on behavior. The human relations movement was influential in highlighting the importance of informal social groups, good human relations, and meeting employee needs to improve motivation and productivity. Studies like the Hawthorne Experiments showed that social and group factors strongly influence individual behavior at work. OB aims to apply this knowledge to enhance organizational effectiveness and performance.
Organizational behavior (OB) is the study of how individuals and groups act within organizations. It examines human behavior in work settings to gain an understanding of performance. OB draws from psychology, sociology, and social psychology to study individuals, groups, and organizational structure and their impact on behavior. The human relations movement was influential in highlighting the importance of informal social groups, good human relations, and meeting employee needs to improve motivation and productivity. Studies like the Hawthorne Experiments showed that social and group factors strongly influence individual behavior at work. OB aims to apply this knowledge to enhance organizational effectiveness and performance.
Organizational behavior (OB) is the study of how individuals and groups act within organizations. It examines human behavior in work settings to gain an understanding of performance. OB draws from psychology, sociology, and social psychology to study individuals, groups, and organizational structure and their impact on behavior. The human relations movement was influential in highlighting the importance of informal social groups, good human relations, and meeting employee needs to improve motivation and productivity. Studies like the Hawthorne Experiments showed that social and group factors strongly influence individual behavior at work. OB aims to apply this knowledge to enhance organizational effectiveness and performance.
Organizational behavior (OB) is the study of how individuals and groups act within organizations. It examines human behavior in work settings to gain an understanding of performance. OB draws from psychology, sociology, and social psychology to study individuals, groups, and organizational structure and their impact on behavior. The human relations movement was influential in highlighting the importance of informal social groups, good human relations, and meeting employee needs to improve motivation and productivity. Studies like the Hawthorne Experiments showed that social and group factors strongly influence individual behavior at work. OB aims to apply this knowledge to enhance organizational effectiveness and performance.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Compiled by: Kefyalew Geneti
Addis Ababa Chapter One: An Overview of OB
• OB is related to the study of individuals, group of people working together and
their expected behavior in organizational setting. • An organization is more than a formal arrangement of functions, more than an organizational chart, more than a vision statement , more than a set of accounts etc… • An organization is a collection of people who work together to achieve individual and organizational goals; it is a social system • No two individuals are likely to behave in the same manner in a particular work situation. • Researchers, management practitioners, psychologists, social scientists etc… must understand the very credentials of an individual, his background, social framework, educational update, impact of social groups and other situational factors on behavior. • It is the human factor that contributes to the productivity. • Hence the study of human behavior in organizational setting is important. Definitions • “OB is a field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups and organizational structure have on behavior within the organization, for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards improving an organizational effectiveness”. • OB is “the study and application of knowledge about human behavior related to other elements of an organization such as structure, technology and social systems (LM Prasad). • “Organizational behavior as a systematic study of the actions and attitudes that people exhibit within organizations.” (S.P. Robins) • “OB is a field of study devoted to understanding, explaining, and ultimately improving the attitudes and behaviors of individuals and groups in organizations.” The three basic levels of analysis in OB Individual Level Analysis: • At the individual level, managers and employees need to learn how to work with people who may be different from themselves in a variety of dimensions, including personality, perception, values, and attitudes. • where employees have a variety of experiences and come from several cultures. • Individuals also have different levels of job satisfaction and motivation, and these affect how managers manage employees. • For instance, some employees may be drug and alcohol dependencies that affected their motivation and productivity. • More organizations expect employees to be empowered and to take on more responsibility than ever before. Contd…. Group Level Analysis: People’s behavior when they are in a group differs from their behavior when they are alone. The behavior of people in groups is more than the sum total of all the individuals acting in their own way. Thus, to better understand OB the study of group behavior is crucial Workforce Diversity: Organizations are becoming more diverse, employing a greater variety of people in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, disabilities, seniority, socio- economic status, educational background, cultural, political, nation or nationality(African, European, Asian, Canadians, Japanese,..), etc.. Therefore today, the ability to adapt to different people is one of the most important and broad-based challenges facing organizations. Much of the success in any job involves developing good interpersonal, or “people,” skills. “Human Skill” that organizations need to have. Contd….. Organizational Level Analysis: OB analysis at organizational level is getting more complex. As groups are not the sum total of individuals, organizations are also not the sum total of individuals and groups. More other organizational level factors may put constraints on individual and group behavior. A. Productivity: An organization or group is productive if it achieves its goals and does so by transferring inputs (labor and raw materials) to outputs (finished goods or services) at the lowest cost. • Productivity implies a concern for both effectiveness (achieving goals) and efficiency (watching costs). Contd…. B. Developing Effective Employees: One of the major challenges facing organizations in the twenty-first century is how to engage employees effectively so that they are committed to the organization. We use the term organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) to describe discretionary behavior that is not part of an employee’s formal job requirements, but that nevertheless promotes the effective functioning of the organization. Recent research has also looked at expanding the work on OCB to team behavior. C. Global Competition The world has come to do business under one umbrella. • In recent years, businesses have faced tough competition with world wide competitors. Therefore, to survive, they have to reduce costs, increase productivity, and improve quality. Mintzberg’s Managerial Roles and OB Cont’d…. Characteristics of OB • A way of thinking • Interdisciplinary field • Having a distinctive humanistic outlook • Performance oriented • Setting external environment as critical • Uses scientific methods to study human behavior in organizational setting • Having application orientation OB development (Past and Present Status)g1 ex. A large number of people have contributed to the growth of OB as a discipline. 1. The Human Relations Movement • Despite the economic progress brought about in part by Scientific Management, • critics were calling attention to the "unpleasant side of progress," which included severe labor/management conflict, lack of concern, boredom, and wasted human resources. These concerns lead a number of researchers to examine the discrepancy between how an organization was supposed to work versus how the workers actually behaved. In addition, factors like World War I, developments in psychology (eg. Freud) and later the depression, all brought into question some of the basic assumptions of the Scientific Management School. • One of the primary critics of the time, Elton Mayo(known as a founder of human relations movement & for his research including Hawthorne studies) , claimed that this "alienation" stemmed from the breakdown of the social structures caused by industrialization, the factory system, and its related outcomes like growing urbanization. Cont’d • The credit of highlighting the importance of informal social groups, good human relation, and the needs for managerial motivation, participation, better communication, good leadership and committee management goes to this school of thought. • McGregor’s theory ‘Y’ is heavily human relation oriented. The theory made it explicit that group relationships are the key to behavior. • It throws light on how and why individuals and group behavior influences workers motivation, supervision, communication pattern and productivity. • Human relations theories also helped to provide a better explanation of why people in Organizations behave as they do by stressing and exploring the role of group. The Hawthorne Studies, by Elton Mayo • The research he conducted under The Hawthorne Studies of the 1930s showed the significance of groups in affecting the behavior of individuals at work. • The research helped him to make certain deductions about how managers behave. • He carried out a number of investigations to look at ways of improving productivity, for example changing lighting conditions in the workplace. His findings were that: • work satisfaction depended to a large extent on the informal social pattern of the work group. • wherever norms of cooperation and higher output were established it was due to a feeling of importance. • Physical conditions or financial incentives had little motivational value • People will form workgroups and this can be used by management to benefit the organizations Cont’d • People’s work performance is dependent on both social issues and job content • Suggested a tensions between worker’s ‘logic of sentiment’ and managers’ ‘logic of cost and efficiency’ which could lead to conflict in the organization • Individual workers cannot be treated in isolation, but as members of a group • Monetary incentives and good working conditions are less important to the individual than the need to belong to the group. • Informal or unofficial groups at workplace have strong influence on behavior of those workers in a group • Managers must be aware of these ‘social needs’ and cater for them to ensure that employees collaborate with the official organization rather than work against it. Contributing fields to OB/its relation with other fields • Psychology: Psychology is an applied science, which attempts to explain human behavior in a particular situation and predicts actions of individuals. • contributed towards various theories on learning, motivation, personality, training and development, theories on individual decision making, leadership, job satisfaction, performance appraisal, attitude, ego state, job design, work stress and conflict management. • Sociology: Science of Sociology studies the impact of culture on group behavior. Contributed to a large extent to the field of group-dynamics, roles that individual plays in the organization, communication, norms, status, power, conflict management, formal organization theory, group forming processes and group decision-making. Cont’d • Social psychology: Working organizations are formal assembly of people who are assigned specific jobs and play a vital role in formulating human behavior. It is a subject where concept of psychology and sociology are blend to achieve better human behavior in organization. • The field has contributed to manage change, group decision-making, communication and ability of people in the organization, to maintain social norms. • Anthropology: It is a field of study relating to human activities in various cultural and environmental frameworks. It understands difference in behavior based on value system of different cultures of various countries. The study is more relevant to organizational behavior today due to globalization, mergers and acquisitions of various industries. • Political Science: The study of the behavior of individuals and groups within a political environment. It contributed to OB concepts like conflict management, intra organizational politics and power. MANAGEMENT and OB IN THE 21ST CENTURY • Information technology is a major force driving change. We are experiencing the rapid integration of information across all industries everywhere, yet it is still people who invent, direct, guide, and manage change in their own careers and in the boundary less organization. This text relates organizational behavior topics to managing dynamic body of knowledge that can be used to understand and manage a wide technological change as a driver of performance and integration. “Business at the speed of thought” is a major factor of competitive advantage. • Another set of success factors that lead to competitive advantage are developing and sustaining world-class products and services with Internet speed and meeting and exceeding customer demand. Organizations are adapting by reengineering, reinventing, restructuring, and rethinking their strategies, structures, and expertise around web-based, Internet integrated business processes. Not all organizations are changing at the same pace or on the same scale. contd • However, Internet-driven networks and software applications have produced a type of “digital Darwinism”. • Internationalism : People and Situations: Internationalism is a relatively new approach to understanding behavior in organizational settings. • First presented in terms of interactional psychology, this view assumes that individual behavior results from a continuous and multidirectional interaction between characteristics of the person and characteristics of the situation. • More specifically, internationalism attempts to explain how people select, Organization Behavior—Text and Cases interpret, and change various situations. • When people enter an organization, their own behaviors and actions shape that organization in various ways. Similarly, the organization itself shapes the behaviors and actions of each individual who becomes a part of it. • This interactionist perspective can be useful in explaining organizational behavior. contd • Organizational behavior is the study of human behavior in organizational settings, the interface between human behavior and the organization, and the organization itself. The study of organizational behavior is important because organizations have a powerful influence over our lives. • * Serious interest in the study of management first developed around the beginning of this century. • Two of the earliest approaches were scientific management (best represented by the work of Taylor) and classical organization theory (exemplified by the work of Weber) i.e. Bureaucracy. • !*Organizational behavior began to emerge as a scientific discipline as a result of the Hawthorne studies. • McGregor and Maslow led the human relations movement that grew from those studies. • *Contemporary organizational behavior attempts to describe, rather than prescribe, behavioral forces in organizations. contd • Ties to psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, engineering, and medicine make organizational behavior an interdisciplinary field. • ! The basic concepts of the field are divided into three categories : individual processes, interpersonal processes, and organizational process and characteristics. Organization as a system (buma 2012) Organization: • A consciously coordinated social unit, composed of two or more people, that functions on a relatively continuous basis to achieve a common goal or set of goals. Also defined as • Is a collection of people who work together to achieve individual and organizational goals Virtual Organization • Virtual Organization popularly known as ‘E’ Organization will have the following characteristics: • 1. There are no generally accepted rules. There are no established and proven e-org models or strategic plans. What worked in March may be scrapped in May. E-orgs in their infancy and players are being forced toe experiment. • 2. Victory goes to the quick. Fast to no longer fast enough. It used to be that the big would eat • the small. In an e-word, the fast eat the slow. Competition is forcing e-organizations to make decisions quickly, develop new products and service in record time, move into market fast, and be able to respond to competitive actions immediately. The old saw “Ready, Aim, Fire” has been replaced by “Fire, Ready, Aim”. • 3. Location doesn’t matter. In the past, the people you hired, the suppliers you used, and the customers you serviced were largely defined by your geographic location. For instance, you hired from the labour pool from Bangalore to New Delhi or tried to entire prospective employees to move from where they lived to where your organization was located. Now, through network linkages, employers in remote locations can have access to the best and brightest. And talented people no longer have to move their residence to pursue job opportunities in faraway places. • 4. Integrated information is everything. Intranets, extranets and the internet have changed the way that information can move inside organizations. Open and integrated information systems allow bypassing of traditional organizational hierarchies; making it easy for employees and managers alike to track projects, democratizing internal decision making; and closely linking organizations to their suppliers, partners, and customers.