in Prof - Ed 9
in Prof - Ed 9
in Prof - Ed 9
Use simple information Work with glossary, Dictionary exercises: Answer key
tools/ resource table of contents, alphabetizing,
materials dictionary matching definitions to
Appropriate
words, synonyms,
information
antonyms, etc.
(found/partially
found/not found)
Results of search, as
part of project (+
comment card)
Notes from individual Models, photo showing use Diagrams, charts, Examples constitutions and
reading and research of manipulatives interpretation of trends civic responsibilities
Writing responses that Written discussion of Written discussions of Position paper on a
illustrate critical and mathematical concepts science concepts social issue
creative thinking
Writing responses to Statistical manipulation Inquiry Designs Investigation of social
literacy components: of data issue
plot, setting, point of
view, character
development, links to
life, theme criticism
Items with evidence of Description of Science-technology- Family shield and
style, organization, mathematical concepts society connections explanations of
voice, clarity found in the physical symbols
world
Evidence of effort-first Papers showing Example of science Proposal to respond to
drafts, second drafts, correction to misconception that is a social problem
finished drafts mathematical errors corrected
Musial (2009)
5. Identify and Evaluate Scoring Criteria
After determining the student reflection guidelines, the next step is to
establish the scoring criteria you will use in evaluating student performance.
By working on the student criteria, students will develop greater ownership of
the process and will have experience in working cooperatively and
collaboratively with you as a teacher. However, as the facilitator of learning,
you are responsible to ensure the reliability and high quality of scoring
criteria. The students should be informed also on how you will evaluate their
portfolios. This can be done by sharing the scoring criteria with your students
so that they can ask questions, give their suggestions and insights. The table
below shows example of Math portfolio under the content of Problem
Solving.
Math Problem-Solving Portfolio Rating Form
Content Categories
_____Problem Solving
_____Estimation
_____Problem One
_____Final Problem
_____Numbers and Operations
_____Predictions
_____Problem Two
To be completed by student:
1. Date submitted:
2. What does this problem say about you as a problem solver?
3. What do you like best about how you solved in this problem?
4. How will you improve your problem-solving skill on the next problem?
To be completed by teacher:
1. Quality of Reflection
Rating Description
5. Has excellent insight into his/her problem-solving abilities and some ideas of how to get better.
4. Has good insight into his/her problem-solving abilities and some ideas of how to get better.
3. Reflects somewhat on problem-solving strengths and needs. Has some idea of how to improve as a problem solver.
2. Seldom reflects on problem-solving strengths and needs. Has little idea of how to improve as a problem solver.
1. Has no concept of himself or herself as a problem solver.
2. Mathematical Knowledge
Rating Description
5. Shows deep understanding of problems, math concepts, and principles. Uses appropriate math terms and all calculations are correct.
4. Shows good understanding of math problems, concepts, and principles. Uses appropriate math terms most of the time. Few
computational errors.
3. Shows understanding of some of the problems, math concepts, and principles. Uses some terms incorrectly. Contains some
computation errors.
2. Errors in the use of many problems. Many terms used incorrectly.
1. Major errors in problems. Shows no understanding of math problems, concepts and principles.
3. Strategic Knowledge
Rating Description
5. Identifies all the important elements of the problem. Reflects an appropriate and systematic strategy for solving the problem; gives clear evidence of a
solution process.
4. Identifies most of the important elements of the problem. Reflects an appropriate systematic strategy for solving the problem and gives clear evidence of a
solution process most of the time.
3. Identifies some important elements of the problem. Gives some evidence of a strategy to solve the problems but process is incomplete.
2. Identifies few important elements of the problem. Gives little evidence of a strategy to solve the problems and the process is unknown.
1. Uses irrelevant outside information. Copies parts of the problem; no attempt at solution.
4. Communication
Rating Description
5. Gives a complete response with clear, unambiguous explanation; includes diagrams and charts when they help clarify explanation; presents strong arguments
that are logically developed.
4. Gives good response with fairly clear explanation, which includes some use of diagrams and charts; presents good arguments that are mostly but not always
logically developed.
3. Explanations and descriptions of problem solution are somewhat clear but incomplete; make use of diagrams and examples to clarify points but arguments are
incomplete.
2. Explanations and descriptions of problems are weak; makes little, if any, use of diagrams and examples to clarify points; arguments are seriously flawed.
1. Ineffective communication: Diagrams misinterpret the problem; arguments have no sound premise.