ECO121-Chapter 32-Open - Economy - Theory
ECO121-Chapter 32-Open - Economy - Theory
ECO121-Chapter 32-Open - Economy - Theory
32
A
Macroeconomic
Theory
of the Open Economy
Lecturer : Mr. Nguyễn Quốc Quân
Email : quannq6@fe.edu.vn;
Phone : 0934940205
FPT Education- FPT University Danang Campus
In this chapter,
look for the answers to these questions:
• In an open economy, what determines the real
interest rate?
• How are the markets for loanable funds and
foreign-currency exchange connected?
• How do government budget deficits affect the
exchange rate and trade balance?
• How do other policies or events affect the
interest rate, exchange rate, and trade balance?
2
Introduction
• The previous chapter explained the basic
concepts: net exports (NX), net capital
outflow (NCO), and exchange rates.
• This chapter ties these concepts together
into a theory of the open economy.
Use this theory to see how govt policies and
various events affect the trade balance,
exchange rate, and capital flows.
3
I. The Market for Loanable Funds
An identity from the preceding chapter:
S = I + NCO
Saving Net capital
Domestic
investment outflow
• Recall:
–S depends positively on
the real interest rate, r.
–I depends negatively on r.
• What about NCO?
A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF THE OPEN
ECONOMY
5
How NCO Depends on the Real Interest Rate
The real interest rate ( r )
is the real return on
domestic assets. Net capital outflow
r
A fall in r makes domestic assets
less attractive
relative to foreign assets. r1
– People in the U.S. purchase
more foreign assets. r2
– People abroad purchase fewer
U.S. assets. NCO
– NCO rises.
NCO
NCO1 NCO2
6
A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF THE OPEN ECONOMY
The Loanable Funds Market Diagram
r adjusts to balance supply
r Loanable funds and demand in the LF market.
r1
D = I + NCO
LF
ACTIVE LEARNING 1
Budget deficits and capital flows
8
ACTIVE LEARNING 1 Answers
The higher r makes U.S. bonds more attractive relative
to foreign bonds, reduces NCO.
A budget deficit reduces saving and the supply of LF,
causing r to rise.
r2 r2
r1 r1
D1 NCO1
LF NCO
9
II. The Market for Foreign-Currency Exchange
• Another identity from the preceding chapter:
Net capital
NCO = NX Net exports
outflow
14
ACTIVE LEARNING 2
The budget deficit, exchange rate, and NX
15
ACTIVE LEARNING 2
Answers Market for foreign-
currency exchange
The budget deficit
reduces NCO and the S2 = NCO2
supply of dollars. E S1 = NCO1
The real exchange
rate appreciates, E2
reducing net exports. E1
Since NX = 0 initially,
the budget deficit D = NX
causes a trade deficit
(NX < 0).
Dollars
16
The “Twin Deficits” Net exports and the budget deficit
often move in opposite directions.
5%
4% U.S. federal
3% budget deficit
Percent of GDP
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3% U.S. net exports
-4%
-5%
1995-2000
1991-95
1986-90
1981-85
1966-70
1971-75
1976-80
2001-05
1961-65
SUMMARY: The Effects of a Budget Deficit
18
Anything
Keepthat
in mind: NCO
increases
The LF marketr (not shown) NCO
determines NCO2 NCO1
will reduce NCOr.
Thissupply
value of E
and the of r S2 S1 = NCO1
then determines
dollars NCO
in the foreign
(shown in upper graph). E2
exchange market.
This value of NCO then E1
Result:
determines supply of D = NX
The real exchange
dollars in foreign exchange dollars
rate appreciates.
market (in lower graph). NCO2 NCO1
20
ACTIVE LEARNING 3
Investment incentives
21
ACTIVE LEARNING 3
Answers
Investment – and the demand for LF – increase at each
value of r.
r rises, causing NCO to fall
Loanable funds Net capital outflow
r r
S1
r2 r2
r1 r1
D2
D1 NCO
LF NCO
NCO2 NCO1 22
ACTIVE LEARNING 3
Answers
Market for foreign-
currency exchange
The fall in NCO
reduces the S2 = NCO2
supply of dollars E S1 = NCO1
in the foreign
exchange market. E2
The real exchange
E1
rate appreciates,
reducing net exports.
D = NX
Dollars
23
Budget Deficit vs. Investment Incentives
• A tax incentive for investment has similar effects as
a budget deficit:
– r rises, NCO falls
– E rises, NX falls
• But one important difference:
– Investment tax incentive increases investment, which
increases productivity growth and living standards in the
long run.
– Budget deficit reduces investment, which reduces
productivity growth and living standards.
24
Trade Policy
• Trade policy:
a govt policy that directly influences the quantity of g&s that
a country imports or exports
• Examples:
– Tariff – a tax on imports
– Import quota – a limit on the quantity of imports
– “Voluntary export restrictions” – the govt
pressures another country to restrict its exports;
essentially the same as an import quota
Trade Policy
• Common reasons for policies to restrict imports:
– Save jobs in a domestic industry that has difficulty
competing with imports
– Reduce the trade deficit
• Do such trade policies accomplish these goals?
• Let’s use our model to analyze the effects of
an import quota on cars from Japan
designed to save jobs in the U.S. auto industry.
r1 r1
D NCO
LF
A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF THE OPEN 27
NCO
ECONOMY
Analysis of a Quota on Cars from Japan
Since NCO unchanged, Market for foreign-
S curve does not shift. currency exchange
The D curve shifts: E S = NCO
At each E,
imports of cars fall, E2
so net exports rise,
D shifts to the right. E1
At E1, there is excess D2
demand in the foreign
D1
exchange market.
E rises to restore eq’m. Dollars
28
r2 r2
r1 r1
D2 NCO2
D1 NCO1
LF NCO
A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF THE OPEN 33
ECONOMY
Capital Flight from Mexico
Market for foreign-
The increase in NCO currency exchange
causes an increase in
E S1 = NCO1
the supply of pesos in
the foreign exchange S2 = NCO2
market.
The real exchange rate E1
value of the peso falls.
E2
D1
Pesos
A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF THE OPEN 34
ECONOMY
US Dollars per currency unit .
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
10/23/1994
11/12/1994
12/2/1994
12/22/1994
1/11/1995
1/31/1995
2/20/1995
3/12/1995
Examples of Capital Flight: Mexico, 1994
4/1/1995
US Dollars per currency unit.
1/1/1997 = 100
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
12/1/1996
2/24/1997
5/20/1997
8/13/1997
11/6/1997
1/30/1998
Examples of Capital Flight: S.E. Asia, 1997
4/25/1998
Thai Baht
Indonesia Rupiah
South Korea Won
7/19/1998
US Dollars per currency unit .
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
5/5/1998
6/14/1998
7/24/1998
9/2/1998
10/12/1998
11/21/1998
Examples of Capital Flight: Russia, 1998
12/31/1998
U.S. Dollars per currency unit .
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
7/1/2001
9/19/2001
12/8/2001
2/26/2002
5/17/2002
8/5/2002
10/24/2002
Examples of Capital Flight: Argentina, 2002
1/12/2003
CASE STUDY: The Falling Dollar
U.S. trade-weighted nominal exchange
90 rate index, March 1973 = 100
From 10/2005
85
to 6/2008,
the dollar
80
depreciated
17.3%
75
70
65
2005 2006 2007 2008 39
CASE STUDY: The Falling Dollar
Two likely causes:
• Subprime mortgage crisis
– Reduced confidence in U.S. mortgage-backed
securities
– Increased NCO
• U.S. interest rate cuts
– From 7/2006 to 7/2008, Federal Funds target rate
reduced from 5.25% to 2.00% to stimulate the
sluggish U.S. economy.
– Increased NCO
40
41
CONCLUSION
• Yet, we should be careful not to blame our
problems on the international economy.
– Our trade deficit is not caused by
other countries’ “unfair” trade practices,
but by our own low saving.
– Stagnant living standards are not caused by imports, but
by low productivity growth.
• When politicians and commentators
discuss international trade and finance,
the lessons of this and the preceding chapter
can help sparate myth from reality. 42
CHAPTER SUMMARY
45