Bonding
Bonding
ORTHODONTICS
Prepared by: Dr. Snehal Patel
Post graduate student part I
Guided by: Dr. Roopal Patel(Reader & P.G Guide)
Dr. Dolly Patel (Dean & H.O.D, Department
of Orthodontics and Dentofacial
Orthopaedics, AMC Dental College and Hospital)
1
Index
Introduction
History
Advantages and disadvantages
Basic steps
Adhesives and brackets
Bonding over different surfaces i.e crowns and restorations, porcelain,
amalgam, gold, composite restoratives.
Re-bonding and Recycling
Indirect Boding
Lingual Bonding
De-bonding
Bonding failure
Conclusion
References
2
Introduction
3
Griffins resilient arch Angle’s pin and tube appliance 1958
assemblage 1930
4
If you look at most surfaces
Through a microscope, you
Will find that they are not smooth
The adhesive must then harden, so that the bond stays together
5
Introduction
From the inception of fixed-appliance orthodontic
treatment, brackets traditionally have been welded
to gold or stainless steel bands.
The band encompassed the tooth circumferentially,
requiring the creation if interproximal space to
accommodate the width of the band material.
This separation process, which was accomplished
initially by placing wires and later elastomerics,
was time-consuming for the orthodontist and
uncomfortable for the patient.
•Saliva ejectors
21
Enamel conditioning
NEW CONCEPTS OF ETCHING:
Laser etching: This new concept was proposed in 1993.
-Angle by J.A.Von Fraunhofer. He showed at 3 watts for 12 sec
laser etching produced acceptable bond strength though
significantly less than conventional acid etching.
He used Nd/ YAG as laser source.
hydrokinetic laser system for acid etching & came to the same
conclusion.
But major disadvantage as reported by Fraunhofer is that high
Bond failure with self etching primer were higher than those with
conventional etching and priming.
Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 33
Sealing(SEP)
Mechanism of action:
Methacrylated phosphoric acid dissolves calcium from hydroxyapaptite.
Etching and monomer penetration to the exposed enamel rods are simultaneous,
and the depth of etch and primer penetration are identical
Halogen
• Light is generated using hot filaments(tungsten).
• It uses about 300 mW / cm 2 power.
• It has a broad wave length of 400 – 520 nm .This results in decreased intensity
of light .
• Curing time:Ortho composites 20 sec. & resin modified glass ionomers-40 sec.
Halogen light achieved highest bond strength with 40 sec curing time .
Disadvantages: power output=less than 1% of power consumption.
-limited lifetime of 100 hours.
Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 43
Adhesives
Argon laser
• Its introduced in late 1980s to increase output light energy to 800 mW / cm2
• It has narrow wave length of 480 nm which corresponds to the peak area of
absorption of camphoroquinone.
• It produces 60% conversion in 5 sec (for unfilled)-10 sec (for filled resins).
Advantages:
• Superior to conventional light cure regarding bond strength.
Disadvantages:
• Requires shielding appliance over teeth which are not bonded.
• Cost.
• Poor portability Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 44
Adhesives
Plasma arc or xenon arc lamp
• Introduced in 1990s for high intensity curing of composites.
-tungstun anode & a cathode in quarts tube filled with xenon gas.
• Light source is xenon gas that is ionized by 2 electrodes.
• The intense white light is filtered to width of 430-490 nm.
• Power density can reach more than 900 mW/cm2 which is about 5 times
more intense than halogen. It uses 1370 mw/ cm2.
IT saves chair side time
3-5 sec. for metal brackets. Bond failure rate is as low as that of halogen.
Disadvantages:
Advantages • • • •
• Has high lifetime of 10000 with little degradation.
- Requires little power to operate.
- Requires no filter to produce blue light.
- It is resistant to shock & vibration.
Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 46
Adhesives
Following results were obtained from various
studies:
light source & adhesive must be compatible.
New light sources are faster than conventional
halogens
fast halogens=brand specific;low heat;less
expensive.
plasma arc lights=shortest curing time, but
expensive and generate heat.
LEDS= small size,
Graber,cordless,quiet,minimal
Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
heat.
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 47
Generation of composites
First Generation
BUONOCORE (1956) – Demontsrated the use of a
Glycerophosphoric acid dimethacrylate – containing
resin, would bond to acid etching dentine.
BOWEN (1965), tried N – phenylglycine and glycidyl
methacrylate .
Bonding occured due to the interaction of this
bifunctional resin with the calcium ions of
hydroxyapatite.
Drawback – Poor bond strength (1 to 3 MPa ).
The first commercial system of this type – Cervident, SS
White
Premalatha Kannaiyappan, S. kishore
Kumar, W,S. Manjula. Enamel
pretreatment before bonding brackets-
A Literature Review. Biomedical &
Pharmacology Journal, Oct 2015 vol.8
(631-640)
48
Second Generation
In the late 1970’s the second generation system were
introduced.
Incorporated halophosphorous esters of unfilled
resins such as bisphenol – A glycidal methacrelate or
bis – GMA, or hydroxyethyl methacrylate, or HEMA.
Bonded to dentine through an ionic bond to calcium
by chlorophosphate groups.
Weak bond strength, but significant improvement
over first generation.
Scotch Bond (3M Dental ), Clearfil (Kuraray Co. Japan)
solution to be applied after etching. Total etching was done with 35 – 37%
phosphoric acid for 15 to 20 secs.
SELF ETCHING PRIMER was developed by Watanabe and Nakabayashi. It is
Contains both acid (Phenyl – p) and the primer ( HEMA and dimethacrylate).
Clearfil liner bond V (Kuraray)
Mega bond (Kuraray)
Prompt – L – Pop ( 3M UniteK )
First step (Reliance)
Transbond Plus ( Unitek 3m )
Ideal 1 (GAC )
One up Bond F ( Tokuyama)
Adv – The combination of etching and priming steps reduce the working time.
Single bond (3M), One step (BISCO)
66
Material Related
Adhesives:
SBS of the composite resin- phosphoric acid
adhesive system is significantly higher than glass
ionomer adhesive system.
Bonding to restorative materials:
For amalgam restoration highest SBS is achieved by
sandblasting the surface( amongst available options
like polishing, sandblasting, chemically corroding
the surface)
Feldspathic porcelian type has a higher SBS than
aluminous percelian type
Nabeel Talic, and Vimal
Nimmi Abraham, glass porcelian type.
Waleed Bakhadher, Hassan Halawany,
80
Draw bracket slot height using a black pencil,
starting from the first molar. This position depends
on the type of malocclusion and on the anatomical
shape of teeth. In open bite and hyperdivergent
faces, brackets should be placed closer to the
occlusal surface of teeth; that is, close to the red line,
thus avoiding teeth extrusion, which could
compromise treatment results. On the other hand,
in deep overbite malocclusions, when extrusion of
posterior teeth is necessary, brackets should be
placed slightly further from the red horizontal line.
81
82
6. Treatment plan should be reviewed with casts
in occlusion, and brackets previously selected
prior to drawing the guide lines on the lower
cast, so as to avoid setbacks during definitive
bonding, such as lower brackets interfering in
postbonding occlusion.
7. Apply a thin layer of separator (Cel-Lac; SS
White, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil), mixed with
water in a 1:1 ratio, over cast teeth surfaces. Brush
the material in the same direction and wait for at
least 20 minutes for it to dry completely.
83
8. Apply orthodontic light-curable adhesive to the bracket
base and position it over the cast surface. Follow the
previously established bonding guide, so that slot and
long axis of brackets lie over the drawn guide lines. Press
the bracket over the pre-established location and remove
excess adhesive . Once all brackets were placed and
positions were checked, use a light-curing unit, for
example Triad 2000 system (Dentsply, York, PA), to cure
the adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Should this type of unit be unavailable, use conventional
light-curing devices, directing the beam towards the
mesial and distal sides of each bracket, for 15 seconds each
and at 2 to 3 mm distance.
84
9. Manufacture the transfer tray. Using a vacuum former,
thermoform a 1-mm thick sheet of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate
(EVA-foam) (Soft; Bio-Art, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) over the
cast. After heated, once the sheet reaches 10 to 12 mm of
distortion, according to manufacturer's instructions, it is
ready to be formed. Trim excess material with scissors and
spray a thin layer of silicone over the tray to help separate
it later from the second tray, to be made with more rigid
material. Thermoform a 1.5-mm thick sheet of
Polyethylene Trephthalate Glycol (PETG-plastic) (Cristal;
Bio-Art) and trim both plates using a carborundum disk, 2
to 3 mm above the cervical margin of teeth, on both
buccal/labial and lingual/palatal surfaces.
85
10. Separate the Cristal tray from the set, trim its
labial/buccal surface up to the gingival margin of bracket
wings, eliminating retention. Use a Scotch Brite brush to
finish it and rinse with water and soap. In the meantime,
immerse the cast and the Soft tray in water for 15 minutes
to dissolve the separator. Press delicately each bracket to
dislodge it from the cast. Fit the Cristal tray over the Soft
tray and remove them from the dental cast. Clean the Soft
tray and the adhesive bases with water and soap, abrading
them gently with an interdental brush, rinse and dry them
completely with oil-free compressed air. Trim any excess
of Soft tray material with scissors, without detaching it
from the outer tray.
86
11. After stone blasting on bracket bases for 2
seconds to remove residual separator, an
opaque surface will form. It is recommended
that stone blasting be carried out using 50-µm
particle size aluminium oxide under light
pressure. Additionally, special care should be
taken not to excessively abrade the adhesive.
Clean trays with oil-free compressed air.
87
Clinical Stage II
12. Without detaching the trays, cut vertical
slits on the Soft tray, above the mesial and
distal bracket wings, using a sharp tip pair of
scissors . This procedure will facilitate tray
removal after bonding. Slits should be cut
immediately prior to the clinical stage, to avoid
undesired bracket displacement in between
procedures, since they decrease tray retention.
88
13. Perform prophylaxis using extra-fine
pumice or oil-free paste, and etch teeth areas to
be bonded with 37% phosphoric acid during 20
seconds. Wash, for additional 20 seconds, each
etched surface
89
14. Isolate area with cotton rolls and dry thoroughly.
15. The decision whether to bond the full arch at once or in
separate parts, by cutting trays into two or three segments, is
influenced by the quality of isolation achieved and ease of
insertion of the transfer tray.
16. Select and apply adhesive to tooth surface and bracket
base, following the manufacturer's instructions. Clinical
experience and in vitrostudies have demonstrated
satisfactory results when Transbond XT Primer adhesive (3M
Unitek) is used for direct orthodontic bonding. A thin layer
of material should be applied to the etched tooth surface,
followed by gentle air spray and reapplication . A single
application over bracket base should also be carried out
90
17. Carefully position the tray over teeth. Once
completely fitted, it is not recommended to
exaggerate on the pressure to stabilize it.
Visually confirm tray correct position through
the clear tray and light-cure each mesial and
distal bracket edges during 10 seconds or use
multiple tip light-curing devices for indirect
bonding.
91
18. Remove the firm Cristal tray with the aid of
a smooth tip instrument, first pressing to
dislodge it towards the occlusal edge . Use
Mathieu pliers to pull the Soft tray off the
previously slit areas above each bracket,
releasing residual retentions, then fully remove
the tray.
92
19. Remove cotton roll isolation and any excess
adhesive with proper instruments. Should
excess adhesive be noticed around brackets,
use specific low-speed burs to remove it. Floss
interproximal areas to secure they are clean.
Orthodontic wires can be inserted immediately
93
https://youtu.be/mxMhX8FGmqM
95
Lingual Bonding
This is a recently invented technique introduced for patients
particularly adults who are highly esthetic consious
-Fujita of Japan was a pioneer in lingual bonding
Advantages:
• Esthetic
• Enamel demineralization is better controlled & of less consequence
• Precise detailing of tooth position can be made without the
distractions of wires & brackets.
• Lip posture seen correctly instead of being artificially determined
in front of incisors.
Kesling’s diagnostic setup in which teeth are set in theraputic
occlusion and brackets are secured onto a full dimension lingual
archwire using HIRO system is used.
Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 96
Debonding
The aim of debonding is to remove the
attachments & all adhesive resin from the tooth
& to restore the surface as closely as possible to
its pretreatment condition without inducing
iatrogenic damage
Procedure: 1. Bracket removal 2. Removal of
residual adhesive
98
Debonding methods Advantages Disadvantages
Mechanical Low cost Risk of enamel fracture
Electrothermal 1. Reduced incidence of Potential for pulpal
bracket failure damage and mucosal
2. Short debonding time burn
Laser Experimental, but High cost of equipment
increased precision
regarding time and
amount of heat
application
Ultrasonic 1. Potentially reduced 1. Increased debonding
enamel damage time
2. Reduced likelihood 2. Extensive wear of
of bracket failure expensive ultrasonic
tip
3. Some force required
4. Soft tissue injury
potential
99
Debonding
Bracket removal- Original method was to place the tips
of a twin-beaked pliers against the mesial and distal
edges of the bonding base and cut the brackets off
between the tooth and the base. A gentler technique is
to squeeze the bracket wings mesiodistally and lift the
bracket off with a peel force
The break is likely to occur at adhesive bracket interface
leaving remnant adhesive
For ceramic brackets low speed grinding with water
cooling can be done
Thermal debonding and use of lasers have potential to
be less traumatic and
Graber,less risky
Vanarsdall: for enamel damage.
Orthodontic
current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page
579-629. 100
101
DEBONDING
Adhesive remanant index
SCORE 0- No adhesive remained on enamel
SCORE 1-Less than 50% adhesive remained on
enamel
SCORE 2-More than 50% adhesive remained
on enamel
All adhesive remained on enamel
105
Bonding Failure
BONDING TROUBLE SHOOTING TYPE III –
BOND FAILURE:
COHESIVE
CAUSES
1. Patient abuse 2. Improper light cure
106
Take Home Message
Good bond strength apparently depends on
(1)avoiding moisture contamination (2)
achieving undisturbed setting of the bonding
adhesive than on variations in the etching
procedures.
When deciding which etching and priming
system to use, each clinician must weigh bond
failure rates against the time saved in bonding
and debonding.
107
Bibilography
1. Graber, Vanarsdall: Orthodontic current principles techniques, 4th
edition,2005. St. Loius , Mosby. page 579-629.
2. Sudhir Sharma, Pradeep Tandon, Amit Nagar, Gyan P Singh1, Alka
Singh, Vinay K Chugh. A comparison of shear bond strength of
orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives
Journal of Orthodontic Science 2014;201 (3):29-33
3. Marcia Cristina Rastelli, Ulisses Coelho, Emígdio Enrique Orellana
Jimenez. Evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with
orthodontic fluoride-releasing composite resins. Dental Press J Orthod
2010 May-June;15(3):106-13
4. Daniel Stewart Bonding Orthodontic Brackets to Stainless Steel
Crowns 2009 Virginia Commonwealth University 1-27
5. Bonding manual by paul gange
6.Paul Gange: The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. AJO-DO 2015
vol 47 issue 4 page no 556-563
108
7.Waleed Bakhadher, Hassan Halawany, Nabeel Talic, Nimmi
Abraham, Vimal Jacob. FACTORS AFFECTING THE SHEAR
BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS- A REVIEW
OF IN VITRO STUDIES 2015 ACTA MEDICA;58(2):43-48
8. Geeta Verma, Mridula Trehan, Sunil Sharma, COMPARISON
OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH AND ESTIMATION OF
ADHESIVE REMNANT INDEX BETWEEN LIGHT-CURE
COMPOSITE AND DUAL CURE COMPOSITE.IJCPD 2013;
6(3):166-170
9. Premalatha Kannaiyappan, S. kishore Kumar, W,S. Manjula.
Enamel pretreatment before bonding brackets- A Literature
Review. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, Oct 2015 vol.8 (631-
640)
109
10. Robrto Justus, Tatiana Cubero, Ricardo Ondarza, Fernando
Morales. A new technique with dosium hypochlorite to increase
Bracket Shear Bond strength of fluoride releasing resin-modified
glass ionomer cements: Comparing shear bond strength of two
adhesive systems with enamel surface deproteinization before
etching, Seminar in Orthodontics, volume 16, issue 1 (66-75)
11. Alessandra Marques et al. Consequences of enamel
110