Unit 4 8604-1
Unit 4 8604-1
Unit 4 8604-1
Unit 4
Experimental Research
Muhammad Usman Rafique
Subject Specialist (Education)
PhD (Education) Scholar
University of Education, Lahore
mrusman89@gmail.com
Outlines
What is experiment
Major Components of an Experiment
Variable & its examples
Types of Variables
Techniques of controlling
extraneous variables
Experimental validity
Internal validity
External validity
Experimental designs
Pre-experimental designs
True Experimental designs
Quasi Experimental Designs
An Experiment
An experiment is a procedure
carried out to support, refute, or
validate a hypothesis.
Experiments provide insight
into cause-and-effect by
demonstrating what outcome
occurs when a particular factor is
manipulated.
An experiment examines the
effects of independent
variable on a dependent
variable.
Major Components of an Experiment
The most conventional type of experiment involves
three major pairs of components:
Independent Variables
Dependent Variables
Intervening Variables
Extraneous Variables
Experimental Research
The researcher manipulates independent variables (e.g., type
of treatment, teaching method, communication strategy) and
measures dependent variables (anxiety level, English
comprehension, satisfaction) in order to establish cause-and-
effect relationships between them.
The independent variable is controlled or set by the
researcher.
The dependent variable is measured by the researcher.
An “experiment” is a prescribed set of conditions which
permit measurement of the effects of a particular Treatment.
Pretest:
The pretest is the measurement of the dependent variable
prior to the introduction of the treatment(e.g.; anxiety
Posttest:
The posttest is the measurement of the dependent variable
after treatment has been introduced into experimental
group
TECHNIQUES OF CONTROLLING
EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES
Randomization
Matching cases
Balancing cases
Analysis of co-variance
Experimental Validity
Internal Validity
Indicates whether the independent variable was the sole
cause of the change in the dependent variable Internal
invalidity asks the question, “Are the measurements I
make on my dependent (i.e., the variable I measure)
variable influenced only by the treatment, or are there
other influences which change it?”
External Validity
Indicates the extent to which the results of the
experiment are applicable to the real world
Internal validity vs. External
validity
Steps in Experimental Research
State the research problem
Determine if experimental methods apply
Specify the independent variable(s)
Specify the dependent variable(s)
State the tentative hypotheses
Determine measures to be used
Pause to consider potential success
Identify intervening (extraneous) variables
Formal statement of research hypotheses
Design the experiment
Final estimate of potential success
Conduct the study as planned
Analyze the collected data
Prepare a research report
Internal validity
History,
Maturation,
Testing,
Instrumentation,
Statistical regression,
Differential selection,
Experimental mortality,
And selection-maturation interaction.
The John Henry effect and experimental treatment
diffusion.
Threats to external validity
Population validity
Hawthrone effect
Experiment effect
Pre test sensitization
Reactive effects of testing
Treatment and Subject Interaction
Testing and Subject Interaction
Multiple Treatment Effect
True Experimental group Design
Experimental designs are considered true experiments
when they employ randomization in the selection of their
samples and control for extraneous influences of variation
on the dependent variable.
The three designs we will consider in this section are the
best choices for an experimental dissertation. These are:
the pretest-posttest control group design,
the Posttest Only Control Group design, and
the Solomon Four Group design.
Advantages of the true-experimental design include:
Greater internal validity Causal claims can be
investigated
Disadvantages: Less external validity (not like real
world conditions)
Not very practical
Quasi-experimental Design
Without proper randomization
Lack of rigorous statistical scrutiny
They lack some of the control of true experimental
designs, but are generally considered to be fine
Example: Nonequivalent group design
Some advantages of the quasi-experimental design
include: Greater external validity (more like real world
conditions) Much more feasible given time and logistical
constraints
Disadvantage: Not as many variables controlled (less
causal claims)
Pre-experimental designs
Weak experimental designs in terms of control
No random sampling
Threats to internal and external validity are significant
problems
Many definite weaknesses
Example:
One-Shot Design
One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design
Static Group Design