Volumetric and Material Balance
Volumetric and Material Balance
Volumetric and Material Balance
School of Engineering
• Table 3- Gas from a well which also is producing petroleum liquid (Ahmed,
2006) 24
Schilthuis (1941)
NBoi( 1 m)
PV
1 S wc
2. Reduced Pressure
The reduced volume results from production from the reservoir
If the surface production is represented at reservoir conditions at
the lower pressure, p, then the volumes should fit into A+B+C+D
which is the total volume change of the original hydrocarbon pore
volume (HCPV)
3.
=
4. Pore volume occupied by remaining oil at p +
5. Pore volume occupied by the gas in the gas cap at p +
6. Pore volume occupied by the evolved solution gas at p +
7. Pore volume occupied by the net water influx at p +
Change in pore volume due to connate-water expansion
8. and pore volume reduction due to rock expansion +
9. Pore volume occupied by the injected gas at p +
Pore volume occupied by the injected water at p
NBoi
where
mNBoi
where
( N N p )Bo
where
mNBoi
Bg
B
gi
where
Bgi = gas formation volume factor at initial pressure pi,
bbl/scf
Bgi = gas formation volume factor at reduced pressure p,
bbl/scf
At initial conditions the reservoir oil contains dissolved gas, denoted by the
formation GOR, Rsi . The total dissolved gas is NRsi . Any produced oil
contains gas (possibly with different GOR – see Primary recovery lecture
material).
NRsi N p R p N N p Rs Bg
Term 1: Initial dissolved Term 2: Gas Term 3: Gas which Expressed at
gas at pressure pi produced remains in solution at reservoir conditions
reduced pressure, p
where,
Np = cumulative oil production, STB
Rp = net cumulative produced GOR, scf/STB
Rs = solution GOR at reduced pressure p, scf/STB
Bg = gas formation volume factor at reduced pressure p, bbl/scf
Rsi = solution GOR at initial reservoir pressure, scf/STB
We W p Bw
where
In a reservoir where there is significant free gas, this component of the MBE
can often be neglected. This is not the case in under-saturated reservoirs
where the term must be included.
V cVp
Change in volume compressibility Change in pressure
Initial volume
NBoi( 1 m)
PV
1 S wc
PV. S wc cw p
Pore volume Change in pressure
Initial water
saturation Water
compressibility
NBoi( 1 m)
S wc cw p
1 S wc
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 21 www.abdn.ac.uk
7. Change in pore volume due to connate water expansion and pore volume
reduction due to rock expansion (cont)
And the reduction in the pore volume due to the expansion of the
reservoir rock
NBoi( 1 m)
c f p
1 S wc
Formation compressibility
S wc cw c f
NBoi( 1 m) p
1 S wc
mNBoi
Bg Volume occupied by gas
cap gas
B
Initial PV occupied by oil
and free gas
gi Volume
NRsi N p R p N N p Rs Bg
occupied by
evolved solution
gas
Volume occupied by
We W p Bw natural water influx
S wc cw c f
NBoi( 1 m) p Connate water and
rock expansion
1 S wc
Ginj Bginj Winj Bwinj
Injected gas and
water
N
N p Bt ( R p Rsi )Bg (We W p Bw )
Bg S wc cw c f
( Bt Bti ) mBti
1 Bti (1 m) p
B
gi 1 S wc
for the primary depletion case, where there is no gas or water injection.
Bt Bo ( Rsi Rs )Bg
9
5.5 ×10
𝑅 𝑝= 6
=1100 𝑠𝑐 𝑓 / 𝑆 𝑇𝐵
5 ×10
Step 3. Solve for the initial oil-in-place by applying material balance equation:
N p B t (R p R si )B g (W e W p Bw )
N &
B S c cf
(B o B oi ) (R si R s ) Bg mB ti g 1 B ti (1 m ) wc w p
B
gi 1 S wc
Bt Bo ( Rsi Rs )Bg
The full form of the material balance equation can be expressed as:
Oil and gas production Net water influx Cumulative fluid injection
N
N p Bo R p Rs Bg (We W p Bw ) Ginj Bginj Winj Bwinj
Bg S wc cw c f
( Bo Boi ) ( Rsi Rs )Bg mBoi 1 Boi (1 m) p
B
gi 1 S wc
Net gas cap expansion
There are three unknowns in the MBE:
N the original oil in place, or STOIIP
m the ratio of the gas cap to original oil volume
We the cumulative water influx into the reservoir
For the primary depletion case i.e. No water or gas injection, Havlena and
Odeh (1963, 1964) wrote the MBE as:
N p [B o R p R s B g ] W p B w W e
N
Bg S wc cw c f
(B o B oi ) (R si R s )B g mB oi 1 B oi (1 m ) p
B
gi 1 S wc
F N p Bo R p Rs Bg W p Bw Eo the expansion of oil
Eo Bo Boi Rsi Rs Bg and dissolved gas
Bg Eg the expansion of
E g Boi 1
B gas cap gas
gi
S wc cw c f
E f ,w Boi 1 m p Ef,w the expansion of
1 S wc initial water and the
reduction in pore volume
F N Eo mEg E f ,w We
Remember: this equation is valid only for the natural depletion case
where there is no gas or water injection into the reservoir
We can now use this formulation of the MBE to plot variables together, in
order to give us estimates of the unknown quantities and gain insights into
the natural reservoir depletion processes.
For example, in the case where there is no initial gas cap (m=0), no water
influx (We=0) and where the water and formation compressibilities can be
neglected (cw=0, cf=0) then we can write:
F NEo
So that if we plot data point of F against Eo we should see a straight line,
with a slope which is equal to the STOIIP, N
N=a/b
a
F
b
Figure 2. Plotting F vs Eo Eo
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 34 www.abdn.ac.uk
Straight Line Solutions of the MBE
F N Eo mE g E f , w We
F N Eo E f ,w
So we can write:
F N p Bo W p Bw
Eo Bo Boi
cw S w c f
E f ,w Boi p
1 S wi
The first task is to define whether the reservoir is indeed
behaving as a volumetric reservoir i.e. No additional influx
into the reservoir – all drive energy comes from the
original oil, connate water and rock expansion
Eo+Ef,w
Figure 3: Plotting F vs Eo+Ef,w
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 38 www.abdn.ac.uk
2. Volumetric Saturated Reservoir
F N E o mE g E f ,w W e
F NEo
where:
F N p Bo R p Rs Bg
Eo Bo Boi Rsi Rs Bg
N=a/b
a
F
so a plot of F against Eo should give a
b
straight line with slope N
Eo
Assumptions:
F N E o mE g E f ,w W e
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 41 www.abdn.ac.uk
3. Gas Cap Drive Reservoir
where
F N Eo mEg
Bg
E g Boi 1
B
gi
a. N unknown, m known
Eo+mEg
Figure 4. Plotting F vs Eo+mEg
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 43 www.abdn.ac.uk
3. Gas Cap Drive Reservoir
b. N known, m unknown
c. N unknown, m unknown Eg
F Eg
We can write E N mN E
o o Slope = mN
So that a plot of F/Eo against F/Eo
Eg/Eo gives a straight line with
slope mN and intercept N N-
Eg /Eo
F N Eo mEg E f ,w We
behaviour.
F -We
Eo
𝐺 =¿ ¿
Gas produced = Initial gas – Remaining gas
or
where G = gas-in-place, scf
A = area of reservoir, acres
h = average reservoir thickness, ft
= porosity
S = water saturation, and
wi
p z
2600 0.82
1000 0.88
400 0.92
Calculate cumulative gas production and recovery factor at 1,000 and 400
psi.
P.V = 43,560 Ah
P.V = 43,560 (3000) (30) (0.15) = 588.06 MMft3
p sc zT zT p z Bg, ft3/scf
Bg 0.02827 2600 0.82 0.0054
T sc p p
1000 0.88 0.0152
400 0.92 0.0397
Step 5. Calculate cumulative gas production Gp and the recovery factor RF at 1,000 and
400 psi.
• At 1,000 psi:
Gp = (87.12 − 30.95) × 109 = 56.17 MMM scf
• At 400 psi:
Gp = (87.12 − 11.95) × 109 = 75.17 MMMscf
𝑃 𝑠𝑐 𝐺𝑃 𝑃 𝑖 𝑉 𝑃 [𝑉 −(𝑊 ¿ ¿ 𝑒 −𝑊 𝑃 𝐵𝑤 )]
= − ¿
𝑅𝑇 𝑠𝑐 𝑍 𝑖 𝑅𝑇 𝑍𝑅𝑇
p scG p pi p
V V
T sc z iT zT
p p i p scT p scG p pi
p
G p V V
z z i T scV T sc z iT zT
• Intercept at G = 0 gives p /z
p i i
p scT
slope
T scV
p zT
V B g G sc i G
T sc p i
p p i p scT
𝑃 𝑃𝑖
=
𝑍 𝑍𝑖
−
(
𝑃𝑖 1
𝑍𝑖 𝐺
𝐺𝑃
)
G p
z z i T scV
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒=−
𝑃𝑖 1
𝑍𝑖 𝐺 ( )
𝑃𝑖
𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑡 :
𝑍𝑖
Log Scale
𝑃 𝑃𝑖
=
𝑍 𝑍𝑖
−
𝑃𝑖 1
𝑍𝑖 𝐺 (
𝐺𝑃 ) z p
log 1 i log G p log G
pi z
V
B gi
G 1
p zT
B g sc
T sc p where V = volume of gas originally in place, ft 3
p sc z iT V
1
T sc p i G GpBg
G
p scG p pi p B g B gi
V V
T sc z iT zT
(cw S wi c f )
G p B g W p Bw G B g B gi GB gi p W e
1 S wi
F We
G
Eg Eg
𝑊𝑒
𝐸𝑔
Figure 7. plot of F/Eg vs Gp
Defining the reservoir-driving mechanism
Roozbeh Rafati, PhD Page 60 www.abdn.ac.uk
List of References (Harvard format):
• Ahmed, T., 2009. Working guide to reservoir rock properties and
fluid flow. Gulf Professional Publishing.
• Ahmed, T., 2013. Equations of state and PVT analysis. Elsevier.
• Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M. and Whiting, R.L., 1960. Petroleum
reservoir engineering: physical properties (Vol. 1). McGraw-Hill
College.
• Ahmed, T., 2006. Reservoir engineering handbook. Gulf
Professional Publishing.
• Dake, L.P., 2001. The practice of reservoir engineering (revised
edition) (Vol. 36). Elsevier.
• Craft, B.C., 1962. Well design: drilling and production. Prentice Hall.