MEE-7-Fiscal - Monetary Policy-Final (2021) - Class
MEE-7-Fiscal - Monetary Policy-Final (2021) - Class
MEE-7-Fiscal - Monetary Policy-Final (2021) - Class
ENVIRONMENT
7. Fiscal And
Monetary Policy
The Composition of Output
and the Policy Mix
• Table summarizes the analysis of the effects of expansionary monetary and
fiscal policy on output and the interest rate (assuming not in a liquidity trap or
in the classical case).
• Monetary policy operates by stimulating interest-responsive components of AD.
• Fiscal policy operates through G and t. Impact depends upon what goods the
government buys and what taxes and transfers it changes.
– Increase in G increases C along with G; reduction in income taxes increases
C.
The Composition of Output
and the Policy Mix
• Figure shows the policy problem of
reaching full employment output,
Y*, for an economy that is initially at
[Insert Figure 11-8 here]
point E, with unemployment.
– Should a policy maker choose:
⮚ Fiscal policy expansion,
moving to point E1, with
higher income and higher
interest rates.
⮚ Monetary policy expansion,
resulting in full employment
with lower interest rates at
point E2.
⮚ A mix of fiscal expansion
and accommodating
monetary policy resulting in
an intermediate position.
The Composition of Output
and the Policy Mix
• All of the policy alternatives
increase output, but differ
significantly in their impact on [Insert Figure 11-8 here]
different sectors of the economy →
problem of political economy
• Given the decision to expand
aggregate demand, who should get
the primary benefit?
– An expansion through a decline
in interest rates and increased
investment spending?
– An expansion through a tax cut
and increased personal
consumption?
– An expansion in the form of an
increase in the size of the
government?
Indian Economy, 2013-2014
Application of IS-LM & AD
i
LM
LM’
India in 2013-14
Increase in GDP = 4.5% pa
Increase in rate of interest = from 7% to 8%
i1
Increase in price level = from 6.9% to 10.2%
i2
Money supply increase = 13% pa (tight)
Fiscal deficit = 7.5% pa (huge)
IS’
IS
Y1 Y2 Y
P
AS India in 2014 -15
P1 Increase in gdp = 6%
P2 Decrease in roi = 8% to 6%
AD2
Decrease in Inflation rate = 10% to 6%
AD1
Money supply increase = 16% (easy)
FD decreased = 4% pa
Y1 Y2 Y
POLICY MEASURES DURING PANDEMIC
•RBI undertook several liquidity enhancing measures to manage liquidity situation in the
economy. These measures, inter alia, included injection of durable liquidity of more than `2.7
lakh crore through Open Market Operation (OMO) purchases between February 6-December
4, 2020, `20,000 crore through two purchase auction OMOs in State Development Loans
(SDLs), `1 lakh crore via Targeted Long Term Repo Operations (TLTROs) of up to three years’
tenor, `1.25 lakh crore through Long Term Repo Operations (LTROs) conducted in February-
March 2020, reduction in the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) requirement of banks from 4 per cent
of net demand and time liabilities (NDTL) to 3 per cent with effect from March 28, 2020
augmenting primary liquidity in the banking system by about `1.37 lakh crore, raising banks’
limit for borrowing overnight under the Marginal Standing Facility (MSF).
•The fiscal policy response of the Government of India to the pandemic was distinct from other
countries in that the demand stimulus was introduced in a phased manner with prior focus on
measures to provide a cushion for the poor and vulnerable sections of society and to the
business sector (especially the MSMEs). This included one of the world’s largest foodgrains
distribution programme, direct cash transfers to 42 crore individuals, more than 20 crore
Women Jan Dhan accounts, cash support to building and construction workers, `30,000 crore
additional emergency working capital funding for farmers through NABARD, additional pension
payments, provision for free gas cylinders, additional allocation under MGNREGS, as well as
government guarantees for credit, postponement of financial deadlines etc.
Current Fiscal Deficit
i
LM
LM’ 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
i1
BS -3.3 -4.5 -3.8 -2.7 -2.4 -1.4 -0.3 +0.8
Y1 Y2 Y
P
Contractionary FP
AS - top income tax rate increased from 28% to 36%
P1 - top corporate tax rate increased from 34% to 36%
P2 - Clinton ended corporate subsidies.
AD2
AD1
Inflation rate averaged 2.6% during 1990s as
compared to 6% earlier.
Y1 Y2 Y
Monetarists
• In 1970s monetarists emerged under Friedman.