Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Phỏng vấn về chương trình học

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

3.

How to access “Stage 1 Standards” on the curriculum mapping portal


/ˈpɔːrtl/

What is ESL curriculum framework?


A detailed assessment and instructional plan
A “map” which shows the distributions of standards into specific teaching &
learning and assessment areas.

🡺 Insights into what students have gained and how they will be assessed at
particular points on the “map”
The agenda includes two main parts. In the first one, we will
explore some general information of the standard system in
Stage 1, starting with the strands and sub-strands. In the
second part, we will try to provide explanations of
terminologies and standards that are reportedly confusing by
teachers. There, we will clarify the terminologies, giving
examples in practice and at the same time, compare and
contrast some standards and emphasize some important
features of standards.
ESL CURRICULUM STRUCTURE
Standards
1.Strands and sub-strands
• Strand: a collection of learning objectives in
the curriculum framework that form an area
of learning.

Sub-strand: sub-sections in the curriculum
framework which divide the strands into more
specific areas for teaching and learning.
Strands and sub-strands
• Fact: A standard set is not a curriculum, but rather the DNA of the curriculum. It
indicates the knowledge and competence students are expected to demonstrate
whatever teaching methodology is applied and what teaching resources are
exploited.
• Teachers know best about what works in the classroom. That is why these
standards establish what students need to learn but do not dictate how teachers
should teach. Instead, schools and teachers will decide how best to help students
reach the standards.

Why no teaching methodology recommendations?
• Answers:
• Student-centered
• Standards demonstrate what students will be able to know and do
• Many approaches/ teaching methods can be used to achieve the same standard
• Teaching methods must be tailored to specific groups of students
Beware of standards that have multiple parts. All parts of a standard needs
to be taught across lessons.

A good understanding of standards helps teachers address the standards


well.
Discussion among peers in the teaching community at school helps create a
uniform understanding and allows for more uniform teaching outcomes.
2.Unit Outcomes & Learning
objectives
• This training video is divided into three parts. Part 1
provides a general introduction to unit outcomes and
lesson objectives, including the definitions and
elaboration of the components and features of a unit
outcome or a lesson objective.
• Part 2 is centered around unit outcomes. In this part,
sample analysis of some unit outcomes is provided,
leading to the conclusions on the requirements of unit
outcome analysis.
From the beginning of this training video, two terms “unit outcomes” and “lesson objectives” are
continuously repeated. So what do they refer to? Basically, both unit outcomes and lesson objectives
are statements of performance for students, which indicate what students should know (knowledge of
students) or should do (competence of student) and how well they should know or do something
(mastery levels). So they are similar in that sense. The difference here is unit outcomes are closely tied
to units while lesson objectives are tied to a lesson, one part of a unit.
Each unit is broken down into lessons. Therefore, remember that Lesson objectives must be more
specific than unit outcomes.
Assessments
1. Formative Assessment:
• Formative assessment is an ongoing process of evaluating and providing feedback to students
during the learning process.
• The main purpose of formative assessment is to monitor and support students' progress,
identify areas of improvement, and guide instructional decisions.
• Formative assessments are typically conducted throughout the learning period and can
include quizzes, discussions, worksheets, projects, and other activities that help students
understand their strengths and weaknesses.
2. Summative Assessment:
• Summative assessment, on the other hand, is a final evaluation of what students have
learned at the end of a course, unit, or specific period of learning.
• The primary goal of summative assessment is to measure the overall learning outcomes and
determine the level of student achievement.
• Summative assessments are typically used to assign grades or evaluate the effectiveness of
an educational program.
• In summary, formative assessments occur throughout the learning process and provide
feedback for improvement, while summative assessments take place at the end of the
learning period and evaluate the overall learning outcomes. Both types of assessments are
essential components of the educational evaluation process and play different roles in
supporting student learning and measuring progress.
3. Assessment
• Standards are statements that specify what students should know and be
able to do with respect to the curriculum.

Standards-based assessment means assessments are aligned to and
referenced against pre-defined standards.
Formative assessment’s
Formative assessment’s focus on continuous assessment and immediate action to
support teaching and learning stands in contrast to teachers’ summative
assessment, as described further below, which is aimed at evaluating student
success or mastery at the end of a learning sequence or at the end of course or
year.

You might also like